한·미·일의 코로나19 초기 재난대응 전략 비교 고찰
A Comparative Study of the Initial Disaster Response Strategy for the COVID-19: In the Case of Korea, USA, and Japan
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
(Purpose) The purpose of this study is to propose a risk management strategy that can build an initial disaster response system focused on effectively predicting and responding to future risks. (Design/methodology/approach) This study conducted an in-depth comparative analysis of the initial disaster response systems of USA, Japan and Korea in terms of national strategy, governance, and decision-making system. To examine the national strategy, governance, and decision-making system of each country, this study focused on analyzing the government reports and newspaper articles dealing with each country’s policy responses to Covid-19. (Findings) In Korea, the inter-organizational, inter-governmental, and inter-sectoral collaboration in terms of governance was achieved in the early stage of COVID-19 response. In the Japanese governance, although many private expert groups existed, the government failed to translated their advice into actual policies in tackling COVID-19. The US government failed to respond effectively to COVID-19 because of the President’s political calculations, although it had a robust disaster response system and good collaborative governance. All of the three countries tried to mitigate the rapid spread of COVID-19 by monitoring its signs and controlling various risk factors. However, because there was little information on the socio-economic effects of COVID-19, the government of each country simply provided a huge amount of relief aid, which created massive financial burden on each country. (Research implications or Originality) This study conducted a comparative analysis of the initial policy responses to COVID-19 in Korea, USA, and Japan. From this comparative analysis, this study drew several implications for how the national management strategy in Korea should be formulated and implemented to effectively forecast and respond to newly emerging risks. First, the Korean government tried to improve the legal system, response organization, and decision-making system in order to promote ‘prevention and preparation’-oriented risk management system. Second, to actively implement risk assessment, which includes both risk detection and evaluation, and build a government organization that is responsible for risk assessment; Third, to launch a reorganization focused on integrating different risk management systems to promote collaborative efforts to mitigate the ripple effects of disasters; Fourth, to strengthen the expert groups’ competencies to support decision-making in the disaster response stage.
Abstract
(Purpose) The purpose of this study is to propose a risk management strategy that can build an initial disaster response system focused on effectively predicting and responding to future risks. (Design/methodology/approach) This study conducted an in-depth comparative analysis of the initial disaster response systems of USA, Japan and Korea in terms of national strategy, governance, and decision-making system. To examine the national strategy, governance, and decision-making system of each country, this study focused on analyzing the government reports and newspaper articles dealing with each country’s policy responses to Covid-19. (Findings) In Korea, the inter-organizational, inter-governmental, and inter-sectoral collaboration in terms of governance was achieved in the early stage of COVID-19 response. In the Japanese governance, although many private expert groups existed, the government failed to translated their advice into actual policies in tackling COVID-19. The US government failed to respond effectively to COVID-19 because of the President’s political calculations, although it had a robust disaster response system and good collaborative governance. All of the three countries tried to mitigate the rapid spread of COVID-19 by monitoring its signs and controlling various risk factors. However, because there was little information on the socio-economic effects of COVID-19, the government of each country simply provided a huge amount of relief aid, which created massive financial burden on each country. (Research implications or Originality) This study conducted a comparative analysis of the initial policy responses to COVID-19 in Korea, USA, and Japan. From this comparative analysis, this study drew several implications for how the national management strategy in Korea should be formulated and implemented to effectively forecast and respond to newly emerging risks. First, the Korean government tried to improve the legal system, response organization, and decision-making system in order to promote ‘prevention and preparation’-oriented risk management system. Second, to actively implement risk assessment, which includes both risk detection and evaluation, and build a government organization that is responsible for risk assessment; Third, to launch a reorganization focused on integrating different risk management systems to promote collaborative efforts to mitigate the ripple effects of disasters; Fourth, to strengthen the expert groups’ competencies to support decision-making in the disaster response stage.
참고문헌 (78)
- Current Status and Future Tasks of COVID-19 Response System, "Bae, Jae Hyun", National Assembly Research Service, ~ (2020)
- Limitations and Improvement of the National Disaster Response Command System, "Bae, Jae Hyun", National Assembly Research Service, ~ (2019)
- Castellano, G., "Governing Ignorance: Emerging Catastrophic Risks–Indstry Responses and Policy Frictions", The Geneva Papers, 35, pp.391~415 (2010)
- Addressing emerging infectious disease threats: a prevention strategy for the United States, "CDC", CDC, ~ (1994)
- Crisis Management Response and Future Prospects to the COVID-19 Crisis in Japan, "Choi, Eun Mi", The Asan Institute for Policy Studies, ~, pp.The Asan Institute for Policy Studies Issue Brief, 2020-13 (2020)
- Choi, H., "Public Health Emergency and Crisis Management: Case Study of SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak", International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), pp.3390~ (2020)[DOI]
- CHS, "Global Health Security Index" (2019), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School
- A Study on the Pan-Governmental Crisis Management System, "Chung, Ji Bum", Korea Institute of Public Administration, ~ (2012)
- Committee of experts on countermeasures against COVID-19, "Analysis and recommendation of COVID-19 countermeasures", ~ (2020)
- Committee of experts on countermeasures against COVID-19, "Analysis and recommendation of COVID-19 countermeasures", ~ (2020)
- COVID-19 Countermeasures Headquarters, "Emergency Response Measures for COVID-19", ~ (2020)
- COVID-19 Countermeasures Headquarters, "Emergency Response Measures for COVID-19", ~ (2020)
- COVID-19 Countermeasures Headquarters, "Emergency Response Measures for COVID-19", ~ (2020)
- COVID-19 Countermeasures Headquarters, "Emergency Response Measures for COVID-19", ~ (2020)
- ENISA, "Emerging and Future Risks Framework: Introductory Manual", European Network and Information Security Agency, ~ (2010)
- GAO, "COVID-19: Critical Vaccine Distribution, Supply Chain, Program Integrity, and Other Challenges Require Focused Federal Attention", Government Accountability Office, ~ (2021)
- GOS, "Reducing Risks of Future Disasters: Priorities for Decision Makers", Government Office for Science, ~ (2012)
- Hur, J., "Crisis Learning and Flattening the Curve: South Korea’s Rapid and Massive Diagnosis of the COVID-19 Infection", American Review of Public Administration, 50(6-7), pp.606~613 (2020)[DOI]
- Hur, Joon Young, "Exploring Possible Catastrophic Disaster Scenarios and Building Korean Disaster Response Systems" (2012), Korea Institute of Public Administration
- IRGC, "IRGC Guidelines for Emerging Risk Governance", IRGC, ~ (2015)
- International Case Study for Future Crisis Management and Implications, "KIHASA", Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, ~ (2014)
- Development of Foresight Method for Future DisasterThrough the Analysis of Complex Foresight Methodology, "Kim Dae Gon", National Disaster Management Research Institute, ~ (2013)
- Pattern analysis on unstructured disaster-related big data, "Kim, Do Woo", National Disaster Management Research Institute, ~ (2017)
- Development of horizon scanning technology for weak signal of future emerging disaster based on big data, "Kim, Do Woo", National Disaster Management Research Institute, ~ (2018)
- Development of weak signal scanning technology for future emerging disaster using machine learning technique(Ⅰ), "Kim, Do Woo", National Disaster Management Research Institute, ~ (2019)
- Short-term forecast, "long-term foresight methodologies for future disasters", Kim, Do Woo, 2016
- Kim, Jun Heon, "Key Contents and Implications of the CARES Act in Response to the COVID-19 Crisis in the United States", Foreign Legistlation : Trends and Analysis, 41, pp.1~7 (2020)
- 김성조, "일본의 코로나19 대응과 그 평가 : 보건의료 분야의 협력적 거버넌스를 중심으로", 일본연구논총, (52), pp.5~33 (2020), 현대일본학회
- A Study on the Payment of Emergency Disaster Support Fund, "Kim, Sung Joo", Ministry of the Interior and Safety, ~ (2020)
- 김태훈, "대형복합재난의 효율적 관리를 위한 제도개선방안 연구", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 19(5), pp.176~183 (2018), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- Development of algorithms and technologies for improving disaster safety information exploration and expanding search area, "Ko, Min Soo", National Disaster Management Research Institute, ~ (2018)
- "Korea Policy Briefing" (2020)[URL]
- Lederberg, J., "Emerging Infections:Microbial Threats to Health in the United States" (1992), National Academies Press
- Trend of Domestic and International Preparedness and Response of Infectious Diseases, "Lee, Daeun", Korea Health Industry Development Institute, ~ (2017)
- Locklear, K., "An Integrated Framework for Managing Extreme Events", ERM Symposium (2011)
- Lyu, Hyeon Suk, "Perception of risks surrounding future risks and communication to the public: Focusing on COVID-19 cases", Future Horizon, 2(45), pp.28~35 (2020)
- Report of future disaster analysis, "MPSS", Ministry of Public Safety and Security, ~ (2017)
- COVID-19: How We are Handling the Outbreak, "NARS", National Assembly Research Service, ~ (2020)
- NAS, "A Research Strategy for Environmental, Health, and Safety Aspects of Engineered Nano-material" (2012), National Academies Press
- OECD, "Future Global Shocks: Improving Risk Governance" (2011), OECD Publishing
- "Press Release of CDC" (2020)[URL]
- 서경화, "감염병 발생시 우리나라의 위기관리체계에 관한 고찰", 국가정책연구, 29(4), pp.219~242 (2015), 국가정책연구소[DOI]
- 서용석, "재난 예방 분야의 안전서비스 동향분석을 통한 재난 안전기술 발전 방안", 한국방재학회논문집, 19(6), pp.171~179 (2019), 한국방재학회[DOI]
- Construction of Fundamental Technologyfor Disaster Risk Assessment and Prediction(Ⅲ): Natural Disaster Risk Assessment, "Sim, Ou Bae", National Disaster Management Research Institute, ~ (2016)
- 송창영, "국내 대형복합재난의 재난대응체계 개선방향", 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집, 21(3), pp.45~53 (2017), 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회
- Sung, Chang Hoon, "COVID-19-related mask supply and demand instability and government response", KIET Monthly Industrial Economics, 1, pp.78~81 (2020)
- Tak, Sang Woo, "A Review of the US Public Health Emergency Preparedness in the context of COVID-19", Global Social Security Review, 13, pp.5~20 (2020)[DOI]
- UN-ECE, "Risk Management in Regulatory Frameworks: Towards a Better Management of Risks" (2012), United Nations Economic Commission for Europe
- World Risk Report 2020, "WEF", WEF, ~ (2020)