본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

온라인 의류 쇼핑 사이트의 제품 사이즈 정보 실태 분석 - 여성용 테일러드 재킷을 중심으로 -

The Sizing Communications in Online Apparel Retail Websites - Focusing on Ready-to-Wear Women’s Tailored Jacket -

0

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류생활과학

초록

This study investigates the apparel sizing communication presented in online retail websites focusing on women’s ready-to-wear tailored jackets and to analyze the meaning of these information as the actual product size guide factor. A total of 34 retail websites were selected based on the highest growth fashion companies list and the best fashion brands list. We collected size information in two types: size specifications including sizing code, body measurements, garment measurements, and size references including customized size guide tools, size information in customer reviews, model size information, and others. Most websites prefer to present garment measurements rather than body measurements that are recommended notations under Korean standards and related regulations. In addition, there was the absence of consistency in presenting measurements list and terms that can confuse consumers in size communication. This study found that the stature measurement was a key factor in size reference despite that it did not represent a proper garment size. The obsolete Korean numbering sizing code such as ‘55 and ‘66 was still used in many ways such as idiomatic expressions for body shape. It also implied that we can take advantage of the old sizing code for accessible size information. The finding of this study gives an in-depth diagnosis of current online sizing information problems and suggests useful basic data for developing online apparel size standards and marketing strategies.

Abstract

This study investigates the apparel sizing communication presented in online retail websites focusing on women’s ready-to-wear tailored jackets and to analyze the meaning of these information as the actual product size guide factor. A total of 34 retail websites were selected based on the highest growth fashion companies list and the best fashion brands list. We collected size information in two types: size specifications including sizing code, body measurements, garment measurements, and size references including customized size guide tools, size information in customer reviews, model size information, and others. Most websites prefer to present garment measurements rather than body measurements that are recommended notations under Korean standards and related regulations. In addition, there was the absence of consistency in presenting measurements list and terms that can confuse consumers in size communication. This study found that the stature measurement was a key factor in size reference despite that it did not represent a proper garment size. The obsolete Korean numbering sizing code such as ‘55 and ‘66 was still used in many ways such as idiomatic expressions for body shape. It also implied that we can take advantage of the old sizing code for accessible size information. The finding of this study gives an in-depth diagnosis of current online sizing information problems and suggests useful basic data for developing online apparel size standards and marketing strategies.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. (2020). Article 2 Paragraph 2, , 2020
  2. . Article 3 Paragraph 4,
  3. "Retailers grapples with $100bn returns problem" (2019)[URL]
  4. "Purchasing trends and best brand in the first half of 2019" (2019)[URL]
  5. Chun, J. S., "A study on consumer's preference for size labeling system of womens's ready-to-wear garments", Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 15(1), pp.105~117 (1996)
  6. "F&F, SI, LF, FILA, Handsume and Cowell fashion lead sustainable growth" (2020)[URL]
  7. Faust, M. E., "A proposal for a new size label to assist consumers in finding well-fitting women’s clothing, especially pants : An analysis of size USA female data and women’s ready-to-wear pants for North American companies", Textile Research Journal, 79(16), pp.1446~1458 (2009)[DOI]
  8. Guan, C., "Apparel recommendation system evolution : an empirical review", International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 28(6), pp.854~879 (2016)[DOI]
  9. 홍희숙, "인터넷 쇼핑 시 중요하게 고려하는 의류상품 구매후기 정보에 관한 탐색적 연구", 한국의류학회지, 35(7), pp.761~774 (2011), 한국의류학회
  10. Hong, J. M., "A study on the realities of the sizing systems of women’s garments", Journal of Korean Traditional Costume, 3(1), pp.135~146 (2000)
  11. 현은경, "남녀 중고등학생 교복 착용 실태에 관한 연구", 한국의류학회지, 32(8), pp.1190~1201 (2008), 한국의류학회
  12. Jang, E., "Components of apparel retailing web sites", Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management : An International Journal, 8(4), pp.375~388 (2004)[DOI]
  13. 김지은, "빅데이터와 인공지능을 중심으로 한 패션산업의 동향", 한국의류학회지, 42(1), pp.148~158 (2018), 한국의류학회
  14. "55, S, 90... Inconsistent apparel sizes make consumers frustrated" (2018)[URL]
  15. 김건아, "인터넷쇼핑몰의 상품정보제공 문제점 분석", 한국디자인포럼, (38), pp.387~397 (2013), 한국디자인트렌드학회[DOI]
  16. "Online fashion market growth and new competitors" (2017)[URL]
  17. Kim, H., "The relationship of body-related self-discrepancy to body dissatisfaction, apparel involvement, concerns with fit and size of garments, and purchase intentions in online apparel shopping", Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 28(4), pp.239~254 (2010)[DOI]
  18. 김지수, "패션 온라인 쇼핑몰에 따른 반품이유와 반품물류서비스 만족도", 감성과학, 23(1), pp.3~16 (2020), 한국감성과학회[DOI]
  19. "‘If you know, it's a chubby body’.. Secret of ‘44 size’" (2013)[URL]
  20. 구희경, "여성복의 구매빈도에 의한 선호도 및 치수 시스템 인지도에 관한 분석", 한국의상디자인학회지, 13(1), pp.125~134 (2011), 한국의상디자인학회
  21. (2020)[URL]
  22. "Fashion is also entering ‘untact business’! Achieved 100 million won in sales for 4 days on Naver’s Bangusuk Fashion Show" (2020)[URL]
  23. Korean Standards Association, "KS K 0051: 2019-Sizing systems for female adult’s garments", Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, ~ (2019)
  24. 이정임, "18~59세 여성의 키에 따른 기성복 선호스타일과 착용적합성에 관한 연구", 한국의류산업학회지, 14(5), pp.821~833 (2012), 한국의류산업학회
  25. 이수진, "인터넷 쇼핑몰의 구매후기 특성이 판매촉진 추구혜택과 구매만족도, 재구매의도 및 구전의도에 미치는 영향", 한국의류산업학회지, 16(1), pp.79~90 (2014), 한국의류산업학회
  26. Ministry of Trade¸ Industry and Energy, "Standardization of Clothing Sizing", Ministry of Trade¸ Industry and Energy, ~ (2004)
  27. 나윤규, "확장된 기술수용모형(ETAM)을 이용한 인터넷 쇼핑몰 패션상품 구매행동 연구 - 지각된 가치와 위험 및 신뢰의 영향을 중심으로", 인터넷전자상거래연구, 10(3), pp.27~49 (2010), 한국인터넷전자상거래학회
  28. [URL]
  29. [URL]
  30. [URL]
  31. "Fashion industry fosters dedicates digital marketing organization" (2020)[URL]
  32. "Size does matter" (2020)[URL]
  33. Rosa, J. A., "Keeping the body in mind : The influence of body esteem and body boundary aberration on consumer beliefs and purchase intentions", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(1), pp.79~91 (2006)[DOI]
  34. "Utilization of big data in fashion company, it is essential, not optional!" (2020)[URL]
  35. Shin, E., "Are negative and positive reviews regarding apparel fit influential?", Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal (2020)[DOI]
  36. "Online shopping trends in May 2020" (2020)[URL]
  37. "Keith Jacket Virtusize" (2020)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)