본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

친환경 아웃도어 웨어 제품 구매의도 결정요인 : 가치-신념-규범 이론을 중심으로

Determinants of Eco-friendly Outdoor Wear Products Purchase Intention : Exploring Value-Belief-Norm Theory

정혜정|오경화|김영화
한국의류산업학회 (The Society of Fashion and Textile Industry)|2015.12|한국의류산업학회지 (The Korean Fashion and Textile Research Journal)|제17권 제6호|pp. 965-977

0

조회

0

다운로드

20

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

구매의도개인적 가치personal valuepurchase intention친환경 아웃도어 웨어환경친화적 신념환경친화적 규범가치-신념-규범 이론eco-friendly outdoor wearpro-environmental beliefpro-environmental normvalue-belief-norm theory
주제분류생활과학

초록

This study aims to investigate determinants that included personal values, pro-environmental beliefs, and proenvironmental norms for enhancing consumers' purchase intention of eco-friendly outdoor wear exploring Stern(2000)’s the value-belief-norm theory. A survey was conducted with females and males between the ages of 20 and 60 who have experienced buying outdoor wear products. A total of 300 responses were analyzed by descriptive analysis, factor analysis, a reliability test, an independent samples t-test, and regression analysis. The results of this study were as follows: 1) The results of exploratory factor analysis and reliability test on the personal value clearly showed factorial structures including the social power, ecologic value, openness, equality, and altruistic value. 2) There are significant differences in personal value sub-dimensions, pro-environmental beliefs, pro-environmental norm, and purchase intention of eco-friendly outdoor wear products according to respondents' gender and age. 3) Personal values, but not social power, affect pro-environmental beliefs; in turn, pro-environmental beliefs affect pro-environmental norms, which then affects purchase intentions of eco-friendly outdoor wear. The findings support the conclusion that there is significant causality among personal value such as ecologic, openness, equality, and altruistic, pro-environmental belief, and pro-environmental norm. This study suggests pragmatic implications to understand outdoor wear consumers' socio-psychological and demographic factors and to augment purchase intentions of eco-friendly outdoor wear products.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate determinants that included personal values, pro-environmental beliefs, and proenvironmental norms for enhancing consumers' purchase intention of eco-friendly outdoor wear exploring Stern(2000)’s the value-belief-norm theory. A survey was conducted with females and males between the ages of 20 and 60 who have experienced buying outdoor wear products. A total of 300 responses were analyzed by descriptive analysis, factor analysis, a reliability test, an independent samples t-test, and regression analysis. The results of this study were as follows: 1) The results of exploratory factor analysis and reliability test on the personal value clearly showed factorial structures including the social power, ecologic value, openness, equality, and altruistic value. 2) There are significant differences in personal value sub-dimensions, pro-environmental beliefs, pro-environmental norm, and purchase intention of eco-friendly outdoor wear products according to respondents' gender and age. 3) Personal values, but not social power, affect pro-environmental beliefs; in turn, pro-environmental beliefs affect pro-environmental norms, which then affects purchase intentions of eco-friendly outdoor wear. The findings support the conclusion that there is significant causality among personal value such as ecologic, openness, equality, and altruistic, pro-environmental belief, and pro-environmental norm. This study suggests pragmatic implications to understand outdoor wear consumers' socio-psychological and demographic factors and to augment purchase intentions of eco-friendly outdoor wear products.

참고문헌 (52)

  1. "What's the environment for outdoor market? Money Today News" (2015)[URL]
  2. Ajzen, I., "Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour" (1980), Prentice-Hall
  3. Lynne Andersson, "Enacting Ecological Sustainability in the MNC: A Test of an Adapted Value-Belief-Norm Framework", Journal of Business Ethics, 59(3), pp.295~305 (2005), Springer Nature[DOI]
  4. Reuben M. Baron, "The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), pp.1173~1182 (1986), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  5. Bennett, W., "Values preferences by gender for nontraditional college students between 1992 and 1982", Counseling and Values, 41(3), pp.246~252 (1997)[DOI]
  6. 차가영, "윤리소비의식이 재활용 의류제품 구매태도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 복식, 64(5), pp.125~140 (2014), 한국복식학회[DOI]
  7. T. Dietz, "Social Structural and Social Psychological Bases of Environmental Concern", Environment and Behavior, 30(4), pp.450~471 (1998), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  8. Riley E. Dunlap, "The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: From Marginality to Worldwide Use", The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(1), pp.3~18 (2008), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  9. Dunlap, R. E., "The new environmental paradigm: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results", Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), pp.10~19 (1978)
  10. A. Ebreo, "Reducing Solid Waste: Linking Recycling to Environmentally Responsible Consumerism", Environment and Behavior, 31(1), pp.107~135 (1999), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  11. Jamie Gaskill-Fox, "CSR reporting on apparel companies’ websites: framing good deeds and clarifying missteps", Fashion and Textiles, 1(1), pp.1~22 (2014), Springer Nature[DOI]
  12. B. Gatersleben, "Measurement and Determinants of Environmentally Significant Consumer Behavior", Environment and Behavior, 34(3), pp.335~362 (2002), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  13. G. A. Guagnano, "Influences on Attitude-Behavior Relationships: A Natural Experiment with Curbside Recycling", Environment and Behavior, 27(5), pp.699~718 (1995), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  14. Guber, D. L., "The grassroots of a green revolution: Polling America on the environment" (2003), MIT Press
  15. Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis with readings" (1998), Prentice Hall
  16. J.R.E. Harger, "Definition of indicators for environmentally sustainable development", Chemosphere, 33(9), pp.1749~1775 (1996), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  17. Jang, Y. S., "study on development of fashion products design made of environment-friendly fabric materials", doctor, pp.2011
  18. Johan Jansson, "Exploring consumer adoption of a high involvement eco-innovation using value-belief-norm theory", Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10(1), pp.51~60 (2011), Wiley-Blackwell[DOI]
  19. 김하빈, "소셜커머스 상황에서 타인의 존재가 구매의도에 미치는 영향- 사회적 실재감과 경쟁심의 매개 효과를 중심으로 -", 소비자학연구, 25(5), pp.167~188 (2014), 한국소비자학회
  20. H.-S. Kim, "Environmental Concern and Apparel Consumption", Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 16(3), pp.126~133 (1998), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  21. HaeJung Kim, "Shifting paradigms for fashion: from total to global to smart consumer experience", Fashion and Textiles, 1(1), pp.1~16 (2014), Springer Nature[DOI]
  22. 김지은, "중국 수출용 아웃도어 웨어 개발을 위한 중국 소비자의 한류에 대한 태도 및 착용실태조사 - 중국인 관광객을 대상으로 -", 한국의류산업학회지, 16(4), pp.614~624 (2014), 한국의류산업학회
  23. Kim, J. Y., "A study on communication effect of sports marketing", master, pp.1998
  24. 3 code of reading wellbeing fever, "Kim, S. I.", LG week economic, 19~24 (2004)
  25. Kim, S. O., "Impact of environmental value, belief, and personal norm on pro-environmental behavior using VBN theory", master, pp.2012
  26. Kim, S. Y., "Analysis on the perceived purchase behavior environmentally friendly clothing", master, pp.2009
  27. Jeffrey K. Lazo, "Expert and Layperson Perceptions of Ecosystem Risk", Risk Analysis, 20(2), pp.179~194 (2000), Wiley-Blackwell[DOI]
  28. "Grow by self, outdoor - Become Korea fashion, 10 year 10% increase. Apparel News" (2013)[URL]
  29. Lee, H. R., "A study on market segmentation by benefits sought by consumers of outdoor items", master, pp.2011
  30. "7 of 10 of consumers, want ecofriendly material of outdoor clothing. Outdoor News Sympatex Korea" (2014)[URL]
  31. Stacy Hyun-Nam Lee, "Impacts of sustainable value and business stewardship on lifestyle practices in clothing consumption", Fashion and Textiles, 2(1), pp.1~18 (2015), Springer Nature[DOI]
  32. Mun, Y. J., "The Influence of sports outdoor wear's brand personality on brand identification, switching barrier, immersion, and customer behavior", doctor, pp.2015
  33. Mustapha Harzallah Ibtissem, "Application of Value Beliefs Norms Theory to the Energy Conservation Behaviour", Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(2), pp.1~11 (2010), Canadian Center of Science and Education[DOI]
  34. A. M. Nordlund, "Value Structures behind Proenvironmental Behavior", Environment and Behavior, 34(6), pp.740~756 (2002), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  35. 백경자, "아웃도어 웨어 기능성 요구에 따른 스마트 아웃도어 재킷 설계시안", 한국의류산업학회지, 16(3), pp.446~455 (2014), 한국의류산업학회
  36. "Rapid growth of outdoor economy, let up. Chosun Magazine" (2015)[URL]
  37. Sang Ho Park, "Poly (ethylene terephthalate) recycling for high value added textiles", Fashion and Textiles, 1(1), pp.1~17 (2014), Springer Nature[DOI]
  38. Kristopher J. Preacher, "SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models", Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), pp.717~731 (2004), Springer Nature[DOI]
  39. Schwartz, S. H., "Normative influences on altruism1", Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, pp.221~279 (1977)[DOI]
  40. Schwartz, S. H., "Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?", Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), pp.19~45 (1994)
  41. Michael W. Slimak, "Personal Values, Beliefs, and Ecological Risk Perception", Risk Analysis, 26(6), pp.1689~1705 (2006), Wiley-Blackwell[DOI]
  42. Sobel, M. E., "Sociological methodology 1982", pp.290~312 (1982), Jossey-Bass
  43. Linda Steg, "Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory", Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), pp.415~425 (2005), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  44. Linda Steg, "Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda", Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), pp.309~317 (2009), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  45. Stern, P. C., "Towards a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour", Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), pp.407~424 (2000)
  46. Stern, P. C., "The value basis of environmental concern", Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), pp.65~84 (1994)
  47. Stern, P. C., "A valuebelief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism", Human Ecology Review, 6(2), pp.81~97 (1999)
  48. CARMEN TANNER, "CONSTRAINTS ON ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOUR", Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(2), pp.145~157 (1999), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  49. Carmen Tanner, "Promoting sustainable consumption: Determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers", Psychology & Marketing, 20(10), pp.883~902 (2003), Wiley-Blackwell[DOI]
  50. John Thøgersen, "Spillover processes in the development of a sustainable consumption pattern", Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(1), pp.53~81 (1999), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  51. 양재장, "친환경 제품 구매자의 환경 가치, 신념 그리고 개인적 규범이 친환경 행동에 미치는 영향: VBN 이론을 중심으로", 환경정책, 21(3), pp.53~80 (2013), 한국환경정책학회[DOI]
  52. "Now essential of eco-friendly for fashion brand. FashionN" (2015)[URL]

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)

백제 사비시대 사찰의 사리장엄구를 활용한 패션문화상품 디자인 개발전희관, 김혜경pp. 871-880실버세대의 운동유형에 따른 액티브 티셔츠 디자인 제안김영순, 구영석pp. 881-894An Analysis of the Strengths and Weaknesses of Seoul Fashion Week with a Focus on Organisational Issues김혜은pp. 895-906ICT 발전과 패션산업에서의 고객 참여- 비즈니스 모델의 가치 공동창출을 활용한 사례 분석 -김윤정, 이유리, 나종연pp. 907-918의류제품 특성에 따른 멀티채널 선택행동 분석 - 한국과 미국 소비자를 중심으로 -김지연pp. 919-931
원문 보기