Die Gegenwart des Opfers Jesu Christi im Ritus des Herrenmahles
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The text explains the latest status of research by means of the example of a new ecumenical document, which takes up the still open questions concerning the problem of the eucharistic sacrifice. The document chooses new methods including even more intensely than hitherto exegetic results of the history of tradition (Traditionsgeschichte) and the reflection on the history of the problem. The Church receives the eucharist as a gift from the Lord. St. Paul wrote: "I have received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said: This is my body, which is for you. Do this in remembrance(anamnesis) of me. In the same way also the cup, after supper, saying. This cup is the new covenent in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me."(Ⅰ). So it is possible to win an authentic biblical outline of the concept of sacrifice. Thus the eucharist continues these meals of Jesus during his earthly life and after his resurrection, always as a sign of the Kingdom. Christians see the eucharist prefigured in the Passover memorial of Israel's deliverance from the land of bondage and in the meal of the Covenant on Mount Sinai(Ex.24). It is the new paschal meal of the Church, the meal of the New Covenant(Ⅱ). On this basis a common interpretation of the very difficult concept of "sacrifice of the church" is obtained for the first time. It is in the light of the significance of the eucharist as intercession that referances to the eucharist in Catholic theology as "propitiatory sacrific" may be understood. The understandingis that there is only expiation, that of the unique sacrifice of the cross, made actual in the eucharist and presented befor the Father in the intercession of Christ and of the Church for all humanity. In the light of the biblical conception of memorial, all churches might want to review the old controversies about "sacrifice and deepen their understanding of the reason why other traditions than their own have either used or rejected this term(Ⅲ). The text belonging to the bilateral colloquy between Lutherans and Roman Catholics does not pretend to be formally a full consensus, but it is "a common statement, which permits an agreement on this difficult subject"(Ⅳ).
Abstract
The text explains the latest status of research by means of the example of a new ecumenical document, which takes up the still open questions concerning the problem of the eucharistic sacrifice. The document chooses new methods including even more intensely than hitherto exegetic results of the history of tradition (Traditionsgeschichte) and the reflection on the history of the problem. The Church receives the eucharist as a gift from the Lord. St. Paul wrote: "I have received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said: This is my body, which is for you. Do this in remembrance(anamnesis) of me. In the same way also the cup, after supper, saying. This cup is the new covenent in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me."(Ⅰ). So it is possible to win an authentic biblical outline of the concept of sacrifice. Thus the eucharist continues these meals of Jesus during his earthly life and after his resurrection, always as a sign of the Kingdom. Christians see the eucharist prefigured in the Passover memorial of Israel's deliverance from the land of bondage and in the meal of the Covenant on Mount Sinai(Ex.24). It is the new paschal meal of the Church, the meal of the New Covenant(Ⅱ). On this basis a common interpretation of the very difficult concept of "sacrifice of the church" is obtained for the first time. It is in the light of the significance of the eucharist as intercession that referances to the eucharist in Catholic theology as "propitiatory sacrific" may be understood. The understandingis that there is only expiation, that of the unique sacrifice of the cross, made actual in the eucharist and presented befor the Father in the intercession of Christ and of the Church for all humanity. In the light of the biblical conception of memorial, all churches might want to review the old controversies about "sacrifice and deepen their understanding of the reason why other traditions than their own have either used or rejected this term(Ⅲ). The text belonging to the bilateral colloquy between Lutherans and Roman Catholics does not pretend to be formally a full consensus, but it is "a common statement, which permits an agreement on this difficult subject"(Ⅳ).
참고문헌 (23)
- 최종호, "에큐메니컬 교회를 위한 모색과 전망", 신학과 실천, (30), pp.507~529 (2012), 한국실천신학회
- Deissler, A, "Das Opfer Jesu Christi und seine Gegenwart in der Kirche: Klärungen zum Opfercharakter des Herrenmahles. Dialog der Kirchen Bd. 3", pp.1983, Verlag Herder Freiburg im Breisgau
- Grane, L., "Die Confessio Augustana. Uni-Taschenbücher 1400" (1986), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
- Hahn, F, "Die Zusammenstellung der exegetischen Ergebnisse bei G. Friedrich. Die Verkündigung des Todes Jesu im Neuen Testament. BThS Bd.6(Biblisch-Theologische Studien)" (1982), Neukirchener
- Hermission, H. J., "Sprache und Ritus im altisraelitischen Kult. Zur "Spiritualisierung" der Kultbegriffe im Alten Testament. WMANT. Bd.19(Wissenschaftliche Monographien zum Alten und Neuen Testament)" (1965), Neukirchener
- Hoffmann, F, "Die Confessio Augustana im ökmenischen Gespräch" (1980), Evangelischer Verlagsanstalt
- 허도화, "공동 예배의 영성 - 한국교회의 변화를 위한 영성 목회 패러다임 -", 신학과 실천, 30(30), pp.31~65 (2012), 한국실천신학회
- 전창희, "제2차 바티칸 공의회 이후 연합감리교회 예배의 변화 - ‘성찬 감사 기도’를 중심으로 -", 신학과 실천, (27), pp.55~84 (2011), 한국실천신학회
- Johann-Adam-Möhler-Institut, "Die Sakramentalität der Kirche in der ökumenischen Diskussion. Konfessionskundliche Schriften Nr. 15" (1983), Verlag Bonifatius
- E. Lohse, "Kleines Handbuch für evangelisch-katholische Begegnungen" (1983), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
- Klinzing, G., "Die Umdeutung des Kultus in der Qumrangemeinde und im Neuen Testament. SUNT. Bd.7(Studien zur Umwelt des Neuen Testament)" (1971), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
- Konfessionskundliches Institut, "Kommentar zu den Limna-Erklärungen über Taufe, Eucharistie und Amt" (1983), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
- Lehmann, K, "Das Opfer Jesu Christi und seine Gegenwart in der Kirche: Klärungen zum Opfercharakter des Herrenmahles. Dialog der Kirchen Bd. 3", pp.1983, Verlag Herder Freiburg im Breisgau
- Lehmann, K., "Das Herrenmahl" (1982), Verlag Bonifatiu s-Druckerei GmbH
- Lehmann, K., "Er wurde für uns gekreuzigt Eine Skizze zur Neubesinnung in der Soteriologie", ThQ(Theologische Quartalschrift), 162, pp.298~317 (1982)
- 문병하, "고린도전서 8-11장에 나타난 주의 만찬에 관한 연구", 신학과 실천, (26), pp.35~58 (2011), 한국실천신학회
- Rendtorff, R, "Studien zur Geschichte des Opfers im Alten Israel" (1967), Neukirchener Verlag
- Schlink, E, "Struktur und Rangordnung der dogamtischen Aussagen über das Herrenmahl, In Das Opfer Jesu Christi und seine Gegenwart in der Kirche: Klärungen zum Opfercharakter des Herrenmahles. Dialog der Kirchen Bd. 3" (1983), Verlag Herder
- Voigt, G, "Lima und das reformatorische Proprium" (1984), Lutherisches Verlagshaus GmbH
- Voss, G, "Wachsende Übereinstimmung in Taufe, Eucharistie und Amt. Hilfen zur Beschäftigung mit den Lima-Erkärungen" (1984), Kyrios-Verlag GmbH Meitingen und Paderborn: Verlag Bonifatius -Druckerei
- Wenz, G, "Die Lehre vom Opfer Christi im Herrenmahl als Problem ökumenischer Theologie Kerygma und Dogma", Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 28, pp.7~41 (1982)
- 위형윤, "리마문서에서 교회일치의 성례성에 관한 연구", 신학과 실천, (19), pp.39~67 (2009), 한국실천신학회
- 위형윤, "Die Sakramentenlehre der Confessio Augustana", 신학과 실천, (25), pp.5~41 (2010), 한국실천신학회