본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Key Factors Affecting Positional Advantage of Export Partnerships

문병준|오한모
한국마케팅과학회 (Korean Scholars of Marketing Science)|2011.12|Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science(마케팅과학연구) (全球营销科学学报)|제21권 제4호|pp. 167-181

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Positional advantageExport-ventureResource-advantage theoryExport intermediary-specific resourcesExport partnerships出口企业资源优势理论出口中间商特有资源地理优势出口合作关系
주제분류경영학

초록

Current economic trends have provided incentives for firms to explore the global competitive landscape, and export-ventures are one of the strategies for developing successful international marketing networks, especially when a firm’s resources are limited. Although research suggests that export-ventures are valuable tools for improving performance in the global marketplace, the establishment of such ventures does not automatically guarantee positive results. Export-venture long-term success depends on the development of close partnerships. Despite this importance, few studies have tried to explain export partnership success. This study represents an attempt to understand the key factors that influence export-venture success. The central thesis of this study is that both exporters and export intermediaries play important roles in developing positional advantages for export-ventures. Using resource-advantage theory of competition as an underlying framework, a model is developed that draws on the relationship marketing theory, alliance theory, and international marketing theory to explain export-venture performance. Five basic categories of resources are posited to influence export-venture positional advantage: exporter-specific resources (e.g., manufacturing capability, brand awareness), export intermediary-specific resources (e.g., export market knowledge, export market experience, relationship building capabilities), partnership-related resources (e.g., partnering experience, the number of partnership-dedicated personnel), relationship-enhancing factors (e.g., interfirm communication quality, role clarity), and relationship-destroying factors (e.g., opportunism, conflict). Finally, an export-venture’s positional advantage is posited as influencing its superior financial performance. Export-ventures, who are more effective, realize increased levels of customer satisfaction and enhanced customer loyalty. These positive outcomes enable export-ventures to charge premium prices, increase market share, and, in turn, improve their financial performances. Therefore, it is posited that: P1: Export-venture positional advantage is positively related to export-venture financial performance. Research suggests that a manufacturing capability improves a firm’s marketplace position. For example, one aspect of a manufacturing capability is efficiency, an important characteristic of marketplace position. Therefore, it is posited that: P2: Manufacturing capability is positively related to export-venture positional advantage. Brand awareness is linked to factors that enable export-ventures to reduce costs and deliver more value to consumers. The rise of global competition has only increased the importance of brand awareness. Therefore, it is posited that: P3: Brand awareness is positively related to export-venture positional advantage. By sharing export market knowledge, about customers and competitors, an intermediary provides an export firm with insights regarding value-adding activities the firm should undertake to match market conditions. Therefore, it is posited that: P4: Export market knowledge is positively related to export-venture positional advantage. Intermediaries with substantial experience in export processes can use the accumulated knowledge from past decisions, actions, and errors to inform decision-makers of opportunities and threats. For example, intermediaries’ experience in a foreign market enables an export-venture to locate foreign customers efficiently. Therefore, it is posited that: P5: Export market experience is positively related to export-venture positional advantage. An export intermediary’s relationship building capability enables the export-venture to also deliver more value. Moreover, an export intermediary’s capability of building strong supplier relationships ensures the consistent delivery of the proper level of customer service. Therefore, it is posited that: P6: Relationship building capability is positively related to export-venture positional advantage. Partnering experience can help an export firm, as well as an export intermediary, develop adequate management routines and avoid mistakes during partnership development and maintenance stages. Consequently, firms with greater partnering experience make decisions that enable their ventures to be more efficient and more effective. Therefore, it is posited that: P7: Partnering experience is positively related to export-venture positional advantage. The employees, who are responsible for interfirm relationships with export partners, are essential alliance managers. Alliance managers provide export firms with benefits, such as securing suitable intermediaries, minimizing the chance of conflict with partners, and working with intermediaries to successfully combine their complementary resources. Therefore, it is posited that: P8: Number of partnership-dedicated personnel is positively related to export venture positional advantage. Because timeliness of information exchange enables partners to quickly understand changing situations in marketplaces, higher levels of communication quality enhance market intelligence and allow export-ventures to respond more quickly to competitive threats and marketplace changes than competitors. Therefore, it is posited that: P9: Interfirm communication quality is positively related to export-venture positional advantage. Role clarity leads to higher levels of trust and commitment among partnerships and facilitates resource integration between partners. Thus, it facilitates the creation of value. Therefore it is posited that: P10: Role clarity is positively related to export-venture positional advantage Opportunism can seriously harm the long-term potential of partnerships. Research suggests that opportunism is negatively impacts export-ventures’ marketplace positions. Opportunism impedes an export-venture’s abilities to deliver additional value and raises its costs. Therefore, it is posited that: P11: Opportunism is negatively related to export-venture positional advantage. Higher levels of dysfunctional conflict retard a export-venture’s ability to deliver value. In addition, it increases costs. That is, it hinders the efficient combining of resources, which can lead to increased expenditures. Therefore, it is posited that: P12: Dysfunctional conflict is negatively related to export-venture positional advantage. This study has scholarly implications. First, based on resource-advantage theory of competition, this study theoretically integrates the resource-based theory of the firm, the competence-based theory of the firm, dynamic capabilities theory, and relationship factors theory. By incorporating these theories, this study helps fill the need for development of export marketing theory. In particular, this study supports the premise that resource-advantage theory of competition provides a solid ground for export-venture success. Second, this study supports the competence-based theory of alliance success in the context of export partnerships. That is, the study suggests that two dimensions of alliance competence (e.g., partnering experience, the number of partnership-dedicated personnel) enable firms to combine resources. Third, this study contributes to the relationship marketing literature. Specifically, the study illustrates that both relationship-enhancing and relationship-destroying factors affect export-ventures’ positional advantage. The understanding of this issue is invaluable because there has been little research that simultaneously considers the two types of interfirm relationship factors. This study also has important implications for marketing managers. First, the study points out the importance of export intermediaries’ knowledge and experience. If partners possess complementary knowledge and experience, the partnership is able to leverage performance differences, create synergies, and, thereby, gain a competitive advantage in the marketplace. Second, the study posits that relationship building capability has a positive effect on an export-venture marketplace position and that firms should identify an export intermediary as part of the firm’s relationship marketing strategy.

Abstract

Current economic trends have provided incentives for firms to explore the global competitive landscape, and export-ventures are one of the strategies for developing successful international marketing networks, especially when a firm’s resources are limited. Although research suggests that export-ventures are valuable tools for improving performance in the global marketplace, the establishment of such ventures does not automatically guarantee positive results. Export-venture long-term success depends on the development of close partnerships. Despite this importance, few studies have tried to explain export partnership success. This study represents an attempt to understand the key factors that influence export-venture success. The central thesis of this study is that both exporters and export intermediaries play important roles in developing positional advantages for export-ventures. Using resource-advantage theory of competition as an underlying framework, a model is developed that draws on the relationship marketing theory, alliance theory, and international marketing theory to explain export-venture performance. Five basic categories of resources are posited to influence export-venture positional advantage: exporter-specific resources (e.g., manufacturing capability, brand awareness), export intermediary-specific resources (e.g., export market knowledge, export market experience, relationship building capabilities), partnership-related resources (e.g., partnering experience, the number of partnership-dedicated personnel), relationship-enhancing factors (e.g., interfirm communication quality, role clarity), and relationship-destroying factors (e.g., opportunism, conflict). Finally, an export-venture’s positional advantage is posited as influencing its superior financial performance. Export-ventures, who are more effective, realize increased levels of customer satisfaction and enhanced customer loyalty. These positive outcomes enable export-ventures to charge premium prices, increase market share, and, in turn, improve their financial performances. Therefore, it is posited that: P1: Export-venture positional advantage is positively related to export-venture financial performance. Research suggests that a manufacturing capability improves a firm’s marketplace position. For example, one aspect of a manufacturing capability is efficiency, an important characteristic of marketplace position. Therefore, it is posited that: P2: Manufacturing capability is positively related to export-venture positional advantage. Brand awareness is linked to factors that enable export-ventures to reduce costs and deliver more value to consumers. The rise of global competition has only increased the importance of brand awareness. Therefore, it is posited that: P3: Brand awareness is positively related to export-venture positional advantage. By sharing export market knowledge, about customers and competitors, an intermediary provides an export firm with insights regarding value-adding activities the firm should undertake to match market conditions. Therefore, it is posited that: P4: Export market knowledge is positively related to export-venture positional advantage. Intermediaries with substantial experience in export processes can use the accumulated knowledge from past decisions, actions, and errors to inform decision-makers of opportunities and threats. For example, intermediaries’ experience in a foreign market enables an export-venture to locate foreign customers efficiently. Therefore, it is posited that: P5: Export market experience is positively related to export-venture positional advantage. An export intermediary’s relationship building capability enables the export-venture to also deliver more value. Moreover, an export intermediary’s capability of building strong supplier relationships ensures the consistent delivery of the proper level of customer service. Therefore, it is posited that: P6: Relationship building capability is positively related to export-venture positional advantage. Partnering experience can help an export firm, as well as an export intermediary, develop adequate management routines and avoid mistakes during partnership development and maintenance stages. Consequently, firms with greater partnering experience make decisions that enable their ventures to be more efficient and more effective. Therefore, it is posited that: P7: Partnering experience is positively related to export-venture positional advantage. The employees, who are responsible for interfirm relationships with export partners, are essential alliance managers. Alliance managers provide export firms with benefits, such as securing suitable intermediaries, minimizing the chance of conflict with partners, and working with intermediaries to successfully combine their complementary resources. Therefore, it is posited that: P8: Number of partnership-dedicated personnel is positively related to export venture positional advantage. Because timeliness of information exchange enables partners to quickly understand changing situations in marketplaces, higher levels of communication quality enhance market intelligence and allow export-ventures to respond more quickly to competitive threats and marketplace changes than competitors. Therefore, it is posited that: P9: Interfirm communication quality is positively related to export-venture positional advantage. Role clarity leads to higher levels of trust and commitment among partnerships and facilitates resource integration between partners. Thus, it facilitates the creation of value. Therefore it is posited that: P10: Role clarity is positively related to export-venture positional advantage Opportunism can seriously harm the long-term potential of partnerships. Research suggests that opportunism is negatively impacts export-ventures’ marketplace positions. Opportunism impedes an export-venture’s abilities to deliver additional value and raises its costs. Therefore, it is posited that: P11: Opportunism is negatively related to export-venture positional advantage. Higher levels of dysfunctional conflict retard a export-venture’s ability to deliver value. In addition, it increases costs. That is, it hinders the efficient combining of resources, which can lead to increased expenditures. Therefore, it is posited that: P12: Dysfunctional conflict is negatively related to export-venture positional advantage. This study has scholarly implications. First, based on resource-advantage theory of competition, this study theoretically integrates the resource-based theory of the firm, the competence-based theory of the firm, dynamic capabilities theory, and relationship factors theory. By incorporating these theories, this study helps fill the need for development of export marketing theory. In particular, this study supports the premise that resource-advantage theory of competition provides a solid ground for export-venture success. Second, this study supports the competence-based theory of alliance success in the context of export partnerships. That is, the study suggests that two dimensions of alliance competence (e.g., partnering experience, the number of partnership-dedicated personnel) enable firms to combine resources. Third, this study contributes to the relationship marketing literature. Specifically, the study illustrates that both relationship-enhancing and relationship-destroying factors affect export-ventures’ positional advantage. The understanding of this issue is invaluable because there has been little research that simultaneously considers the two types of interfirm relationship factors. This study also has important implications for marketing managers. First, the study points out the importance of export intermediaries’ knowledge and experience. If partners possess complementary knowledge and experience, the partnership is able to leverage performance differences, create synergies, and, thereby, gain a competitive advantage in the marketplace. Second, the study posits that relationship building capability has a positive effect on an export-venture marketplace position and that firms should identify an export intermediary as part of the firm’s relationship marketing strategy.

참고문헌 (112)

  1. Aaby, N-E., "Management influences on export performance: A review of the empirical literature 1978-88", International Marketing Review, 6(4), pp.7~26 (1989)
  2. Aaker, D. A., "Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name" (1991), Free Press
  3. Aaker, D. A., "Developing business strategies" (1992), John Wiley
  4. Agarwal, S., "Choice of foreign market entry mode: An empirical study of U.S. equipment leasing firms. Advances in International Marketing", pp.33~55 (1990), JAI Press
  5. Agarwal, S., "Choice of foreign market entry mode: Impact of ownership, location and internalization factors", Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), pp.1~27 (1992)
  6. Anand, B.N., "Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances", Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp.295~315 (2000)
  7. Anderson, E., "The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels", Journal of Marketing Research, 29, pp.18~34 (1992)
  8. Arnett, D.B., "Enhancing customer needs-driven CRM strategies: Core selling teams, knowledge management competence, and relationship marketing competence", Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 25(4), pp.329~343 (2005)
  9. Arnulf, J.K., "Trust and knowledge creation: How the dynamics of trust and absorptive capacity may affect supply chain management development projects", International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 8(3), pp.225~236 (2005)
  10. Bello, D.C., "The antecedents and performance consequences of relationalism in export distribution channels", Journal of Business Research, 56(1), pp.1~16 (2003)
  11. Bello,D.D., "Evaluating export middlemen in alternative channel structures", International Marketing Review, 8(5), pp.49~64 (1991)
  12. Bergen, M., "Agency relationships in marketing: A review of the implications and applications of agency and related theories", Journal of Marketing, 56, pp.1~24 (1992)
  13. Blomstermo, A.D., "Choice of foreign market entry mode in service firms", International Marketing Review, 23(2), pp.211~229 (2006)
  14. Bonaccorsi, A., "On the relationship between firm size and export intensity", Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4), pp.605~635 (1992)
  15. Brouthers, K.D., "Does international entry mode choice influence firm performance? international business: Adjusting to new challenges and opportunities", pp.194~204 (2002), Palgrave
  16. Burgel, O., "The international market entry choices of start-Up companies in high-technology industries", Journal of International Marketing, 8(2), pp.33~62 (2000)
  17. Business Roundtable, "Trade and american jobs: The impact of trade on U.S. and state-level employment" (2010)
  18. Cavusgil, S. T., "Selecting foreign distributors: An expert systems approach", Industrial Marketing Management, 24(4), pp.297~304 (1995)
  19. Cavusgil, S. T., "Marketing strategy-performance relationship: An investigation of the empirical link in export market venture", Journal of Marketing, 58(1), pp.1~21 (1994)
  20. Chen, I.J., "Towards a theory of supply chain management: The constructs and measurements", Journal of Operations Management, 22(2), pp.119~150 (2004)
  21. Chimhanzi, J., "Explanation from the marketing", human resources dyad for marketing strategy implementation effectiveness in service firms, 2005, pp.58(6), 787~796
  22. Czinkota, M.R., "International marketing" (2007), Cengage Learning
  23. Day, G.S., "The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations", Journal of Marketing, 58, pp.37~52 (1994)
  24. Day, G.S., "Advantageous alliances", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), pp.297~300 (1995)
  25. De Gesu, A.P., "Planning as learning", Harvard Business Review, 66(2), pp.70~74 (1988)
  26. De Luca, L.M., "Market knowledge dimensions and cross-functional collaboration: Examining the different routes to product innovation performance", Journal of Marketing, 71(1), pp.95~112 (2007)
  27. Dess, G.G., "Voluntary turnover, special capital, and organizational performance", Academy of Management Review, 26(3), pp.446~456 (2001)
  28. Dyer, J.H., "How to make strategic alliances work", Sloan Management Review, 42(4), pp.37~43 (2001)
  29. Eisenhardt, K. M., "Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms", Organization Science, 7(2), pp.136~150 (1996)
  30. Flint, D.J., "Customer value change in industrial marketing relationships: A call for new strategies and research", Industrial Marketing Management, 26, pp.163~175 (1997)
  31. Frazier, G.L., "The use of influence strategies in interfirm relationships in industrial product channels", Journal of Marketing, 55, pp.52~69 (1991)
  32. Gordon, G.L., "Brand equity in the business-to-business sector: An exploratory study", Journal of Product and Brand Management, 2(3), pp.4~16 (1993)
  33. Grant, R.M., "Contemporary strategy analysis: Concepts, techniques, applications" (1998), Blackwell Business
  34. Greenly, G.E., "Market orientation and company performance: Empirical evidence from UK companies", British Journal of Management, 6(1), pp.1~13 (1995)
  35. Greenly, G.E., "Exchange interdependence and interfirm interaction: Research in a simulated channel setting", Journal of Marketing Research, 31(4), pp.516~532 (1994)
  36. Helfat, C.E., "Know-how and asset complementary and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D", Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), pp.339~360 (1997)
  37. Hibbard, J.D., "Examining the impact of destructive acts in marketing channel relationships", Journal of Marketing Research, 38, pp.45~61 (2001)
  38. Hill, T., "Flexibility—a manufacturing conundrum", International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 11(2), pp.5~13 (1991)
  39. Hoang, H., "The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance", Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), pp.332~345 (2005)
  40. Hoyer, W.D., "Effects of brand awareness on choice for a common, repeat purchase product", Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), pp.141~148 (1990)
  41. Hunt, S.D., "A general theory of competition: Resources, competences, productivity, economic growth" (2000), Sage
  42. Hunt, S.D., "Marketing theory: Foundations, controversy, strategy, resource-advantage theory" (2010), M. E. Sharpe
  43. Hunt, S.D., "The comparative advantage theory of competition", Journal of Marketing, 59, pp.1~15 (1995)
  44. International Trade Administration, "Top U.S. trade partners" (2010)
  45. John, G., "An empirical investigation of some antecedents of opportunism in a marketing channel", Journal of Marketing Research, 21(3), pp.278~289 (1984)
  46. Johnson, J.L., "The role of relational knowledge stores in interfirm partnering", Journal of Marketing, 63(3), pp.21~36 (2004)
  47. Kale, P., "Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of alliance function", Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), pp.747~767 (2002)
  48. Katsikeas, C.S., "Import stimuli and import development", Management International Review, 38(3), pp.215~237 (1998)
  49. Katsikeas, C.S., "Firm-level export performance assessment: Review, evaluation, and development", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(4), pp.493~511 (2000)
  50. Katsikeas, C.S., "Determinants of export performance in a european context", European Journal of Marketing, 30(6), pp.6~35 (1996)
  51. Keller, K.L., "Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity", Journal of Marketing, 57, pp.1~22 (1993)
  52. Keller, K.L., "Strategic branding management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity" (2008), Prentice Hall
  53. Keller, K.L., "Brands and branding: research findings and future priorities", Marketing Science, 25(6), pp.740~759 (2006)
  54. Kogut, B., "Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology", Organizational Science, 3(3), pp.383~397 (1992)
  55. Kotabe, M., "State government promotion of manufacturing exports: A gap analysis", Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4), pp.637~658 (1992)
  56. Kotler, P., "Marketing management" (2009), Prentice Hall
  57. Koza, K.L., "Effects of relationship climate, control mechanisms, and communications on conflict resolution behavior and performance outcomes", Journal of Retailing, 83(3), pp.279~296 (2007)
  58. Krasnikov, A., "The relative impact of marketing, research-and-development, and operations capabilities on firm performance", Journal of Marketing, 72, pp.1~11 (2008)
  59. Lazer, W., "Global marketing management: At the dawn of the new millenium", Journal of International Marketing, 8(1), pp.65~77 (2000)
  60. 이형탁, "수출입 업자간의 거래 지속에 영향을 미치는 관계특성에 대한 연구", Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science(마케팅과학연구), 15(2), pp.161~182 (2005), 한국마케팅과학회
  61. 이용기, "Investigating the Effects of Relationship Quality on Organizational Commitment and Prosocial Behavior in Hotel Food & Beverage Division†", Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science(마케팅과학연구), 17(3), pp.109~132 (2007), 한국마케팅과학회
  62. Leonidou, L.C., "National export-promotion programs as drivers of organizational resources and capabilities: Effects on strategy, competitive advantage, and performance", Journal of International Marketing, 19(2), pp.1~29 (2011)
  63. Levitt, B., "Organizational learning", Annual Review of Sociology, 14, pp.319~340 (1988)
  64. Li, L., "Research note: The internet’s impact on export channel structure", Thunderbird International Business Review, 46(4), pp.443~463 (2004)
  65. Mathieu, J.E., "A review and Meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment", Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), pp.171~194 (1990)
  66. McDonald, E.K., "Brand awareness effects on consumer decision making for a common, repeat purchase product: A replication", Journal of Business Research, 48(1), pp.5~15 (2000)
  67. McNaughton, R., "The export mode decision-making process in small knowledge-intensive firms", Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 19(1), pp.12~20 (2001)
  68. Mellat-Parast, M., "Learning: The interface of quality management and strategic alliances", International Journal of Production Economics, 114(2), pp.820~829 (2008)
  69. Menon, A., "The quality and effectiveness of marketing strategy: Effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict in intraorganizational relationships", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(4), pp.299~313 (1996)
  70. Mohr, J.J., "Collaborative communication in interfirm relationships: Moderating effects of integration and control", Journal of Marketing, 60(3), pp.103~115 (1996)
  71. Morgan, N.A., "Antecedents of export venture performance: A theoretical model and empirical assessment", Journal of Marketing, 68, pp.90~108 (2004)
  72. Morgan, N.A., "Brand portfolio strategy and firm performance", Journal of Marketing, 73(1), pp.59~74 (2009)
  73. Morgan, R.M., "The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing", Journal of Marketing, 58(3), pp.20~38 (1994)
  74. Morgan, R.M., "Relationship-based competitive advantage: The role of relationship marketing in marketing strategy", Journal of Business Research, 46(3), pp.281~290 (1999)
  75. Muris, T.J., "Opportunistic behavior and the law of contracts.Minnesota Law", Minnesota Law Review, 65, pp.521~590 (1981)
  76. Nygaard, A., "Role stress and effectiveness in horizontal alliances", Journal of Marketing, 66(2), pp.61~82 (2002)
  77. Palich, L.E., "Managing in the international context: Testing cultural generality of sources of commitment to multinational enterprses", Journal of Management, 21(4), pp.671~690 (1995)
  78. Panteli, N., "Trust and conflict within virtual inter organizational alliances: A framework for facilitating knowledge sharing", Decision Support Systems, 39(4), pp.599~617 (2005)
  79. Pardo, T.A., "Building response capacity through cross-boundary information sharing: The critical role of trust. Exploiting the knowledge economy: Issues, applications, case Studies" (2006), IOS Press
  80. Paulraj, A., "Inter-organizational communication as a relational competency: antecedents and performance outcomes in collaborative buyer- seller relationships", Journal of Operational Management, 26(1), pp.45~64 (2008)
  81. Peng, M.W., "Export intermediary firms: A note on export development research", Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3), pp.609~620 (1998)
  82. Peng, M.W., "Behind intermediary performance in export trade: Transactions, agents, and resources", Journal of International Business Studies, 32(2), pp.327~346 (2001)
  83. Pfeffer, J., "Management half-truths and nonsense: How to practice evidence based management", California Management Review, 48(3), pp.77~100 (2006)
  84. Phillips, C., "The B2B internet report: Collaborative commerce" (2000), Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Equity Research
  85. Piercy, N.F., "Market-led strategic change,London" (1997), Butterworth-Heinemann
  86. Piercy, N.F., "Sources of competitive advantage in high performing exporting companies", Journal of World Business, 33(4), pp.378~393 (1998)
  87. Piercy, N.F., "Examining the role of buyer-seller relationships in export performance", Journal of World Business, 32(1), pp.73~86 (1997)
  88. Pondy, L.R., "Organizational conflict: Concepts and models", Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(2), pp.296~320 (1967)
  89. Prahalad, C. K., "The core competence of the corporation", Harvard Business Review, 68(3), pp.79~91 (1989)
  90. Quińones, M. A., "The relationship between work experience and job performance: A conceptual and meta-analytic review", Personnel Psychology, 48(4), pp.887~910 (1995)
  91. Rindfleisch, A., "Transaction cost analysis: Past, present, and future applications", Journal of Marketing, 61, pp.30~54 (1997)
  92. Roth, A.V., "Success factors in manufacturing", Business Horizons, 35(4), pp.73~81 (1992)
  93. Schoenmakers, W., "Learning in strategic technology alliances", Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 18(2), pp.245~264 (2006)
  94. Seringhaus, F. H. R., "The role of information assistance in small firms’ export involvement", International Small Business Journal, 5(2), pp.26~36 (1987)
  95. Sheth, J.N., "Supplier relationships: Emerging issues and challenges", Industrial Marketing Management, 26(2), pp.91~100 (1997)
  96. Shin, G-C., "Factors that influence the trust between franchisor and franchisees of chinese franchise system", Journal of Global Academy of Marketing Science, 18(2), pp.73~95 (2008)
  97. Slater, S.F., "Market orientation and the learning organization", Journal of Marketing, 59, pp.63~74 (1995)
  98. Souchon, A. L., "A conceptual framework of export marketing information use: Key issues and research propositions", Journal of International Marketing, 4(3), pp.49~71 (1996)
  99. Spekman, R. E., "Alliance management: A view from the past and a look the future", Journal of Management Studies, 35, pp.747~772 (1998)
  100. Spekman, R. E., "Creating strategic alliances which endure", Long Range Planning, 29(3), pp.346~357 (1996)
  101. Steenkamp, J., "How perceived brand globalness creates brand value", Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), pp.53~65 (2003)
  102. Stewart, D.B., "The effects of export stimulation: Implications for export performance", Journal of Marketing Management, 15(6), pp.505~518 (1999)
  103. Stump, R.L., "Controlling supplier opportunism in industrial relationships", Journal of Marketing Research, 33, pp.431~441 (1996)
  104. Economic report of the president, "U.S. Government Printing Office", ~ (2010)
  105. Vangen, S., "Enhancing leadership for collaborative advantage: Dilemmas of ideology and pragmatism in the activities of partnership", British Journal of Management, 14, pp.61~76 (2003)
  106. Wathne, K.H., "Opportunism in interfirm relationships: Forms, outcomes, and solutions", Journal of Marketing, 64, pp.36~51 (2000)
  107. Wittmann, C. M., "Explaining alliance success: Competences, resources, relational factors, and resource-advantage Theory", Industrial Marketing Management, 38(7), pp.743~756 (2009)
  108. Wolff, B., "Contractual problems in market relations. Principles of Justice and the European Union", pp.83~95 (1995), Jurisförlaget
  109. Wong, H.Y., "Multiple roles for branding in international marketing", International Marketing Review, 24(4), pp.384~408 (2007)
  110. World Trade Organization, "International Trade Statistics" (2010), Author
  111. Yadav, M.S., "Interactivity in the electronic marketplace: An exposition of the concept and implications for research", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(4), pp.585~603 (2005)
  112. Zollo, M., "Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities", Organization Science, 13(3), pp.339~351 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

Explaining International Expansion Through Export-Venture Market Orientation: A Perspective of Resource-Advantage Theory of Competition오한모, Da-Som Kim경영경제연구소 · 아태비즈니스연구2017 · 제8권 제1호Key Drivers of Export-Venture Competitive Advantage : An Empirical Assessment of Korean Start-Up Firms안상봉, 오한모한국창업학회 · 한국창업학회지2017 · 제12권 제3호Study on the Interaction Effects of Firm’s Capabilities and Its International Marketing Alliance’s Capability for SME’s Export Performance이병호한국중소기업학회 · 중소기업연구2008 · 제30권 제4호Examining the Influence of ‘Competitive- Location-Cooperation Advantages’ on the Export Performance of Korean Small and Medium-Sized Firms권영철한국기업경영학회 · 기업경영연구2009 · 제16권 제3호The Effects of Export Market Prioritization on Superior Financial Performance: A Focus on Propositional Development오한모경영경제연구소 · 아태비즈니스연구2019 · 제10권 제3호The effects of internal marketing capability on export marketing strategy, B2B marketing mix and export performance김경훈, 김상진, Kyong Ryul Koo한국마케팅과학회 · Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science(마케팅과학연구)2016 · 제26권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)

The Effect of the Lifestyles of Social Networking Service Users on Luxury Brand Loyalty고은주, 박진아, Hyunjeong Songpp. 182-192Advertising versus Sales Promotion: An Examination of the Japanese Food Industry, 1976-2008Changju Kim, Yingzi Xu, Kenneth F. Hydepp. 193-200Which Complementary Product Do You Like? Exploring the Effects of Complementary Products on the Patronage of Main ProductsKu Yun Chung, 박성연pp. 201-209Influences of Time Perspective on Impulsive Purchase TendencyEugene Song, 이성수pp. 210-217
원문 보기