본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Releasing the death-grip of null hypothesis statistical testing ( p < .05): Applying complexity theory and somewhat precise outcome testing (SPOT)

1

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

Even though several scholars describe the telling weaknesses in such procedures, the dominating logic in research in the management subdisciplines continues to rely on symmetric modeling using continuous variables and null hypothesis statistical testing (NHST). Though the term of reference is new, somewhat precise outcome testing (SPOT) procedures are available now and, along with asymmetric modeling, enable researchers to better match data analytics with their theories than the current pervasive theory–analysis mismatch. The majority (70%+) of articles in the leading journals of general management, marketing, fi nance, and the additional management sub-disciplines are examples of the mismatch. The mismatch may be a principal cause for the scant impact of the majority of articles. Asymmetric modeling and SPOT rests on the principal tenets of complexity theory rather than overly shallow and simplistic symmetric modeling and reporting of NHST fi ndings. Though relatively rare, examples of asymmetric modeling and SPOT are available now in the management literature. The current lack of instructor knowledge and student training in MBA and PhD programs of asymmetric modeling and SPOT are the likely principal reasons for this scarcity.

Abstract

Even though several scholars describe the telling weaknesses in such procedures, the dominating logic in research in the management subdisciplines continues to rely on symmetric modeling using continuous variables and null hypothesis statistical testing (NHST). Though the term of reference is new, somewhat precise outcome testing (SPOT) procedures are available now and, along with asymmetric modeling, enable researchers to better match data analytics with their theories than the current pervasive theory–analysis mismatch. The majority (70%+) of articles in the leading journals of general management, marketing, fi nance, and the additional management sub-disciplines are examples of the mismatch. The mismatch may be a principal cause for the scant impact of the majority of articles. Asymmetric modeling and SPOT rests on the principal tenets of complexity theory rather than overly shallow and simplistic symmetric modeling and reporting of NHST fi ndings. Though relatively rare, examples of asymmetric modeling and SPOT are available now in the management literature. The current lack of instructor knowledge and student training in MBA and PhD programs of asymmetric modeling and SPOT are the likely principal reasons for this scarcity.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. "2013 Survey of Consumer Finances" (2016)[URL]
  2. Armstrong, J. S., "How to avoid exploratory research", Journal of Advertising Research, 10, pp.27~30 (1970)
  3. Armstrong, J. S., "Illusions in regression analysis", International Journal of Forecasting, 28, pp.689~694 (2012)
  4. Bass, F. M., "Market segmentation : Group versus individual behavior", Journal of Marketing Research, 5, pp.264~270 (1968)
  5. Chang, C. -W., "Configural algorithms of patient satisfaction, participation in diagnostics, and treatment decisions’ influences on hospital loyalty", Journal of Services Marketing, 27, pp.91~103 (2013)
  6. Cheng, C. -F., "Confi gural paths to successful product innovation", Journal of Business Research, 66, pp.2561~2573 (2013)
  7. Cohen, J., "The earth is round (p <.05)", American Psychologist, 49, pp.997~1003 (1994)
  8. Feurer, S., "Applying confi gurational theory to build a typology of ethnocentric consumers", International Marketing Review, 33, pp.351~375 (2016)
  9. Fiss, P. C., "A set-theoretic approach to organizational confi gurations", Academy of Management Review, 32, pp.1180~1198 (2007)
  10. Fiss, P. C., "Building better casual theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organizational research", A cademy of Management Journal, 54, pp.393~420 (2011)
  11. Fitzsimons, G. J., "Editorial : Death to dichotomizing", Journal of Consumer Research, 35, pp.5~8 (2008)
  12. Frösén, J., "What counts versus what can be counted : The complex interplay of market orientation and marketing performance measurement", Journal of Marketing, 80, pp.60~78 (2016)
  13. Gigerenzer, G., "From tools to theories : A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology", Psychological Review, 98, pp.254~267 (1991)
  14. Gigerenzer, G., "Mindless statistics", Journal of socio-economics, 33, pp.587~606 (2004)
  15. Gigerenzer, G., "R atinality for mortals" (2008), Oxford University Press
  16. Gigerenzer, G., "Homo heuristics: Why biased minds make better inferences", Topics in Cognitive. Science, 1, pp.107~143 (2009)
  17. Gigerenzer, G., "Simple heuristics that make us smart" (1999), Oxford University Press
  18. Gladwell, M., "Th e tipping point", New Yorker, 72, pp.32~39 (1996)
  19. Hsu, S. Y., "Critical tests of multiple theories of culture’s consequences: Comparing the usefulness of models by Hofstede, Inglehart, and Baker, Schwartz, Steenkamp, as well as GDP and distance for explaining overseas tourism behavior", Journal of Travel Research, 52, pp.679~704 (2013)
  20. Hubbard, R., "Corrupt research: The case for reconceptualizing empirical management and social science" (2016), Sage
  21. Iacobucci, D., "Toward a more nuanced understanding of the statistical properties of a median split", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25, pp.652~665 (2015)
  22. Iacobucci, D., "The median split : Robust, refined, and revived", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25, pp.690~704 (2015)
  23. Kerlinger, F. N., "Multiple regression in behavioral research" (1973), Holt, Rinehart, & Winston
  24. Luce, R. D., "The tools-to-theory hypothesis. Review of G. Gigerenzer and D. J. Murray, cognition as intuitive statistics", Contemporary Psychology, 33, pp.582~583 (1988)
  25. McClelland, D. C., "Identifying competencies with behavioral-event interviews", Psychological Science, 9, pp.331~339 (1998)
  26. Meehl, P. E., "Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks : Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology", Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, pp.806~834 (1978)
  27. Ordanini, A., "When the recipe is more important than the ingredients : A qualitative comparative analysis(QCA)of service innovation confi gurations", Journal of Service Research, 17, pp.134~149 (2014)
  28. Pham, M. T., "The seven sins of consumer psychology", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23, pp.411~423 (2013)
  29. Ragin, C. C., "Turning the tables: How case-oriented methods challenge variable oriented methods?", Comparative Social Research, 16, pp.27~42 (1997)
  30. Ragin, C. C., "Redesigning social inquire: Fuzzy sets and beyond" (2008), The University of Chicago Press
  31. Rucker, D. D., "A researcher’s guide to regression, discretization, and median splits of continuous variables", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25, pp.666~678 (2015)
  32. "Scholastic Aptitude Test" (2016)[URL]
  33. Skinner, B. F., "Cumulative record" (1972), Appleton-Century-Crofts
  34. Simon, H. A., "What is an “explanation” of behavior?", Psychological Science, 3, pp.150~161 (1992)
  35. Stevens, S. S., "The predicament in design and signifi cance", Contemporary Psychology, 9, pp.273~276 (1960)
  36. Trafimow, D., "Editorial", Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36, pp.1~2 (2014)
  37. Trafimow, D., "Editorial", Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37, pp.1~2 (2015)
  38. Woodside, A. G., "Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms : Calling for a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and craft ing theory", Journal of Business Research, 66, pp.463~472 (2013)
  39. Arch G. Woodside, "Proposing A New Dominant Logic For Data Analysis In Research In Marketing And Consumer Research: Case Study Research Of Large-N Survey Data For Estimating Algorithms That Accurately Profile X (Extremely High-Use) Consumers", Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science(마케팅과학연구), 22(4), pp.277~289 (2012), 한국마케팅과학회
  40. Woodside, A. G., "Bad to good : Achieving high quality and impact in your research" (2016), Emerald
  41. Woodside, A. G., "The complexity turn: Cultural, management, and marketing applications" (2017), Springer
  42. Woodside, A. G., "Achieving accuracy, generalization-to-contexts, and complexity in theories of business-to-business processes", Industrial Marketing Management, 42, pp.382~393 (2013)
  43. Woodside, A. G., "Triple sense-making of fi ndings from marketing experiments using the dominant variable based-logic, Case-Based Logic, and Isomorphic Modeling", International Journal of Business and Economics, 12, pp.131~153 (2013)
  44. Woodside, A. G., "Incompetency and competency training" (1916), Springer
  45. Wu, P. -L., "Applying complexity theory to deepen service dominant logic : Confi gural analysis of customer experience-and-outcome assessments of professional services for personal transformations", Journal of Business Research, 67, pp.1647~1670 (2014)
  46. Zadeh, L., "Fuzzy sets", I nformation and Control, 8, pp.338~353 (1965)
  47. Zadeh, L., "Fuzzy logic : Computing with words", I EEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 4, pp.103~111 (1996)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)