본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Short and sweet: How product quality uncertainty, review length and richness shape review helpfulness

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

Because online reviews facilitate consumers’ purchase decisions, prior research investigates factors impacting review helpfulness. By integrating Kuhlthau’s information search process model and the heuristicsystematic model, we propose that a situational factor – product quality uncertainty – shapes consumers’ information search processes and suggests which reviews are most helpful. The literature suggests that review length and information richness positively impact review helpfulness. However, their joint effect conditional on product quality uncertainty is unknown. An experiment reveals that consumers are motivated to process individual reviews only when uncertainty is high (i.e. when consumers disagree on product quality). Analysis of over 37,000 online reviews indicates that, under high uncertainty, short reviews with rich information are most helpful. Consistent with the experiment results, neither factor drives helpfulness when uncertainty is low (i.e. when previous consumers exhibit a consensus on product quality).We present managerial implications for stimulating “short and sweet” reviews to increase review helpfulness.

Abstract

Because online reviews facilitate consumers’ purchase decisions, prior research investigates factors impacting review helpfulness. By integrating Kuhlthau’s information search process model and the heuristicsystematic model, we propose that a situational factor – product quality uncertainty – shapes consumers’ information search processes and suggests which reviews are most helpful. The literature suggests that review length and information richness positively impact review helpfulness. However, their joint effect conditional on product quality uncertainty is unknown. An experiment reveals that consumers are motivated to process individual reviews only when uncertainty is high (i.e. when consumers disagree on product quality). Analysis of over 37,000 online reviews indicates that, under high uncertainty, short reviews with rich information are most helpful. Consistent with the experiment results, neither factor drives helpfulness when uncertainty is low (i.e. when previous consumers exhibit a consensus on product quality).We present managerial implications for stimulating “short and sweet” reviews to increase review helpfulness.

참고문헌 (52)

  1. Ahmad, S. N., "How do expressed emotions affect the helpfulness of a product review? Evidence from reviews using latent semantic analysis", International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 20(1), pp.76~111 (2015)[DOI]
  2. Akbarabadi, M., "Predicting the helpfulness of online customer reviews : The role of title features", International Journal of Market Research, 62(3), pp.272~287 (2020)[DOI]
  3. Argo, J. J., "The sound of brands", Journal of Marketing, 74(4), pp.97~109 (2010)[DOI]
  4. Atkin, C., "New models for mass communication research", pp.205~242 (1973), Sage
  5. Avery, R. J., "Determinants and search for nondurable goods : An empirical assessment of the economics of information theory", The Journal of Consumer Affair, 30(2), pp.390~420 (1996)[DOI]
  6. Babić Rosario, A., "The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales : A meta-analytic review of the platform, product, and metric factors", Journal of Marketing Research, 53(3), pp.297~318 (2016)[DOI]
  7. Case, D. O., "Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior" (2016), Emerald Group Publishing Limited
  8. Chen, S., "Dual-process theories in social psychology", pp.73~96 (1999), The Guilford Press
  9. Chen, Z., "Temporal contiguity and negativity bias in the impact of online word of mouth", Journal of Marketing Research, 50(4), pp.463~476 (2013)[DOI]
  10. Chevalier, J. A., "The effect of word of mouth on sales : Online book reviews", Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), pp.345~354 (2006)[DOI]
  11. Deveaud, R., "Accurate and effective latent concept modeling for ad hoc information retrieval", Document numérique, 17(1), pp.61~84 (2014)[DOI]
  12. Eagly, A., "The Psychology of attitude" (1993), Harcourt, Brace, & Janovich
  13. Fang, B., "Analysis of the perceived value of online tourism reviews : Influence of readability and reviewer characteristics", Tourism Management, 52, pp.498~506 (2016)[DOI]
  14. Fischer, M., "How important are brands? A cross-category, cross-country study", Journal of Marketing Research, 47(5), pp.823~839 (2010)[DOI]
  15. Fisher, M., "Seeing stars : How the binary bias distorts the interpretation of customer ratings", Journal of Consumer Research, 45(3), pp.471~489 (2018)[DOI]
  16. Fresneda, J. E., "A semantic measure of online review helpfulness and the importance of message entropy", Decision Support Systems, 125, pp.113~117 (2019)[DOI]
  17. Goh, K. Y., "Social media brand community and consumer behavior : Quantifying the relative impact of user-and marketer-generated content", Information Systems Research, 24(1), pp.88~107 (2013)[DOI]
  18. Hayes, A. F., "Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis" (2018), The Guilford Press
  19. Hayes, A. F., "Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable", British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), pp.451~470 (2014)[DOI]
  20. Hong, H., "Understanding the determinants of online review helpfulness : A meta-analytic investigation", Decision Support Systems, 102, pp.1~11 (2017)[DOI]
  21. Hu, N., "Ratings lead you to the product, reviews help you clinch it? The mediating role of online review sentiments on product sales", Decision Support Systems, 57, pp.42~53 (2014)[DOI]
  22. Humphreys, A., "Automated text analysis for consumer research", Journal of Consumer Research, 44(6), pp.1274~1306 (2017)[DOI]
  23. Jia, H., "Does the length of a review matter in perceived helpfulness? The moderating role of product experience", Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 16(2), pp.221~236 (2022)[DOI]
  24. Kang, Y., "Longer is better? A case study of product review helpfulness prediction", Americas Conference of Information System 2016 Proceedings, 1 (2016)
  25. Khare, A., "The assimilative and contrastive effects of word-of-mouth volume : An experimental examination of online consumer ratings", Journal of Retailing, 87(1), pp.111~126 (2011)[DOI]
  26. Köcher, S., "The mode heuristic in service consumers’ interpretations of online rating distributions", Journal of Service Research, 24(4), pp.582~600 (2021)[DOI]
  27. Kuhlthau, C. C., "The role of experience in the information search process of an early career information worker : Perceptions of uncertainty, complexity, construction, and sources", Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(5), pp.399~412 (1999)[DOI]
  28. Lafreniere, K. C., "The power of profanity : The meaning and impact of swear words in word of mouth", Journal of Marketing Research, 59(5), pp.908~925 (2022)[DOI]
  29. Lee, S., "The determinates of helpfulness of online reviews", Behaviour & Information Technology, 35(10), pp.853~863 (2016)[DOI]
  30. Liu, Y., "Online review helpfulness : The moderating effects of review comprehensiveness", International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(2), pp.534~556 (2021)[DOI]
  31. Ludwig, S., "More than words : The influence of affective content and linguistic style matches in online consumer reviews on conversion rates", Journal of Marketing, 77(1), pp.87~103 (2013)[DOI]
  32. Lutz, B., "Are longer reviews always more helpful? Disentangling the interplay between review length and line of argumentation", Journal of Business Research, 144, pp.888~901 (2022)[DOI]
  33. Lu, L., "Is your restaurant worth the risk? A motivated perspective on reviews’ rating distribution and volume", Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 44(8), pp.1291~1317 (2020)[DOI]
  34. Montaguti, E., "Content that engages your customers : The role of brand congruity and promotions in social media", Journal of Interactive Marketing, 58(1), pp.16~33 (2023)[DOI]
  35. Mudambi, S. M., "What makes a helpful review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon com", MIS Quarterly, 34(1), pp.185~200 (2010)[DOI]
  36. Roy, G., "Role of electronic word-of-mouth content and valence in influencing online purchase behavior", Journal of Marketing Communications, 25(6), pp.661~684 (2019)[DOI]
  37. Schoenmueller, V., "The polarity of online reviews : Prevalence, drivers and implications", Journal of Marketing Research, 57(5), pp.853~877 (2020)[DOI]
  38. Shannon, C. E., "A mathematical theory of communication", The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), pp.379~423 (1948)[DOI]
  39. Siering, M., "Explaining and predicting online review helpfulness : The role of content and reviewer-related signals", Decision Support System, 108, pp.1~12 (2018)[DOI]
  40. Singh, J. P., "Predicting the ‘helpfulness’ of online consumer reviews", Journal of Business Research, 70, pp.346~355 (2017)[DOI]
  41. "Sources of information about products in the U.S" (2023)[URL]
  42. Sun, M., "How does the variance of product ratings matter", Management Science, 58(4), pp.696~707 (2012)[DOI]
  43. Wang, Y., "Want some help? How online reviews influence consumer decision making", Doctor, pp.2019
  44. Wang, Y., "Revisiting online reviews: Signals of latent reviewer traits mediate the review length-helpfulness relationship", Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, pp.1~16 (2023)[DOI]
  45. Willemsen, L. M., "‘Highly recommended!’The content characteristics and review usefulness of online consumer reviews", Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(1), pp.29~38 (2011)[DOI]
  46. Wooldridge, J. M., "Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data" (2010), MIT Press
  47. Wu, P. F., "In search of negativity bias : An empirical study of perceived helpfulness of online consumer reviews", Psychology & Marketing, 30(11), pp.971~984 (2013)[DOI]
  48. Wu, Y., "The impact of user review volume on consumers’ willingness-to-pay : A consumer uncertainty perspective", Journal of Interactive Marketing, 33, pp.43~56 (2016)[DOI]
  49. Yang, Z. J., "Information sufficiency and attribution of responsibility : Predicting support for climate change policy and pro-environmental behavior", Journal of Risk Research, 18(6), pp.727~746 (2015)[DOI]
  50. Yoon, S. -J., "Social-cultural-psychological perspectives on future word-of-mouth research", Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 28(2), pp.166~174 (2018)[DOI]
  51. Zhang, J. Q., "When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews", Journal of Business Research, 63(12), pp.1336~1341 (2010)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)