본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

“Nature’s Piece ’gainst Fancy”: Simulation, Performance, and Gender in Antony and Cleopatra

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Cleopatra’s versatility has provoked much anxiety and fascination in history. Many have shown strong disapproval of her use of histrionics by associating it with the trope of feminine duplicity. Against this series of disapproval, feminist scholars such as Hélène Cixous sought to find in her a way to counter the phallocentric fantasy of self-presence. This essay examines the political potential of Cleopatra’s histrionic versatility, drawing on Luce Irigaray’s and Judith Butler’s theories of performativity and subversive mimesis. Cleopatra’s histrionic improvisation simultaneously provokes and unsettles the traditional fear of feminine duplicity. By reconfiguring reality and selfhood in terms of theatrical construction, she deconstructs the dualism between presence and representation, between reality and hyperreality, and thus foregrounds the structural problem of phallocentrism that seeks to bind identity to the realm of substance and truth. Through a close examination of the politics of performance in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra, this essay examines how Shakespeare’s Cleopatra anticipates and continues to inform feminist attempts to defy phallocentric identitarian categories and furthermore to challenge the cultural logic of phallocentrism.

Abstract

Cleopatra’s versatility has provoked much anxiety and fascination in history. Many have shown strong disapproval of her use of histrionics by associating it with the trope of feminine duplicity. Against this series of disapproval, feminist scholars such as Hélène Cixous sought to find in her a way to counter the phallocentric fantasy of self-presence. This essay examines the political potential of Cleopatra’s histrionic versatility, drawing on Luce Irigaray’s and Judith Butler’s theories of performativity and subversive mimesis. Cleopatra’s histrionic improvisation simultaneously provokes and unsettles the traditional fear of feminine duplicity. By reconfiguring reality and selfhood in terms of theatrical construction, she deconstructs the dualism between presence and representation, between reality and hyperreality, and thus foregrounds the structural problem of phallocentrism that seeks to bind identity to the realm of substance and truth. Through a close examination of the politics of performance in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra, this essay examines how Shakespeare’s Cleopatra anticipates and continues to inform feminist attempts to defy phallocentric identitarian categories and furthermore to challenge the cultural logic of phallocentrism.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Adelman, Janet, "The Common Liar: An Essay on Antony and Cleopatra" (1973), Yale UP
  2. Agnew, Jean-Christophe, "Worlds Apart: The Market and the Theater in Anglo-American Thought 1550-1750", Cambridge UP
  3. Barish, Jonas, "The Antitheatrical Prejudice" (1981), U of California P
  4. Baudrillard, Jean, "Simulacra and Simulation. Trans. Sheila Faria Glaser" (1994), U of Michigan P
  5. Belsey, Catherine, "Cleopatra’s Seduction. in Alternative Shakespeares. Vol. 2", pp.38~62 (1996), Routledge
  6. Bevington, David, "Introduction. Antony and Cleopatra. By William Shakespeare", pp.1~70 (1990), Cambridge UP
  7. Butler, Judith, "Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory. in Performing Feminisms: Feminist Critical Theory and Theatre", pp.270~82 (1990), Johns Hopkins UP
  8. Butler, Judith, "Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex" (1993), Routledge
  9. Charnes, Linda, "Notorious Identity: Materializing the Subject in Shakespeare" (1993), Harvard UP
  10. Attacks, "Sorties: Ways Out", pp.U of Minnesota P, Forays. Hélène Cixous and Catherine Clément. The Newly Born Woman
  11. Derrida, Jacques, "Dissemination. Trans. Barbara Johnson" (1981), U of Chicago P
  12. Drakakis, John, "Introduction. in Antony and Cleopatra: New Casebooks", pp.1~32 (1994), Macmillan
  13. Drakakis, John, "Antony and Cleopatra: New Casebooks" (1994), Macmillan
  14. Garber, Marjorie, "Vested Interests: Cross-Dressing and Cultural Anxiety" (1992), Routledge
  15. Gosson, Stephen, "The School of Abuse. London, 1579. Shakespeare’s Theater: A Sourcebook", pp.19~33 (2004), Blackwell
  16. Gosson, Stephen, "Plays Confuted in Five Actions. London, 1582. Shakespeare’s Theater: A Sourcebook", 84~114
  17. Greenblatt, Stephen, "Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare" (1980), U of Chicago P
  18. Harris, Jonathan Gil, "Untimely Matter in the Time of Shakespeare" (2009), U of Pennsylvania P
  19. Hilliard, Stephen S, "Stephen Gosson and the Elizabethan Distrust of the Effects of Drama", ELR, 9, pp.225~39 (1979)
  20. Howard, Jean E, "The Stage and Social Struggle in Early Modern England" (1994), Routledge
  21. Irigaray, Luce, "This Sex Which Is Not One. Trans. Catherine Porter and Carolyn Burke" (1985), Cornell UP
  22. Irigaray, Luce, "Speculum of the Other Woman" (1985), Cornell UP
  23. James, Heather, "The Politics of Display and the Anamorphic Subjects of Antony and Cleopatra. in Shakespeare’s Later Tragedies: A Collection of Critical Essays", pp.208~34 (1996), Prentice Hall
  24. Koselleck, Reinhart, "Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time" (2004), Columbia UP
  25. Lacan, Jacques, "The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XI: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller" (1981), Norton
  26. Levine, Laura, "Men in Women’s Clothing: Anti-theatricality and Effeminization 1579-1642" (1994), Cambridge UP
  27. Little, Arthur L, "Shakespeare Jungle Fever: National-Imperial Re-Visions of Race, Rape, and Sacrifice" (2000), Stanford UP
  28. Milward, Peter, "Shakespeare’s Religious Background" (1973), Indiana UP
  29. Montrose, Louis, "The Purpose of Playing: Shakespeare and the Cultural Politics of the Elizabethan Theatre" (1996), U of Chicago P
  30. Norris, Christopher, "Post-structuralist Shakespeare: Text and Ideology. in Alternative Shakespeares", pp.47~66 (1985), Methuen
  31. Plato, "The Collected Dialogues" (1961), Princeton UP
  32. Plato, "The Republic" (1987), Penguin
  33. Rackin, Phyllis, "Shakespeare’s Boy Cleopatra, the Decorum of Nature and the Golden World of Poetry", pp.78~100, New Casebooks
  34. Sedinger, Tracey, "‘If Sight and Shape Be True’: The Epistemology of Crossdressing on the London Stage", Shakespeare Quarterly, 48, pp.63~79 (1997)
  35. Shakespeare, William, "Antony and Cleopatra. Ed. David Bevington" (1990), Cambridge UP
  36. Sidney, Sir Philip, "The Defence of Poesy. in Sidney’s ‘The Defence of Poesy’ and Selected Renaissance Literary Criticism", pp.1~54 (2004), Penguin
  37. Singh, Jyotsna, "Renaissance Anti-theatricality, Anti-feminism, and Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra", pp.308~29, New Casebooks
  38. Stubbes, Philip, "The Anatomy of Abuses", London, ~
  39. Weber, Samuel, "Theatricality as Medium" (2004), Fordham UP
  40. Weed, Elizabeth, "The Question of Style.in Engaging with Irigaray: Feminist Philosophy and Modern European Thought", pp.79~109 (1994), Columbia UP
  41. Whigham, Frank, "Ambition and Privilege: The Social Tropes of Elizabethan Courtesy Theory" (1984), U of California P
  42. Worthen, W. B, "The Weight of Antony: Staging ‘Character’ in Antony and Cleopatra", SEL, 26, pp.295~307 (1986)
  43. Žižek, Slavoj, "The Sublime Object of Ideology" (1989), Verso

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)