『교태부리는 여자』와 『샬롯 템플』에 나타나는 여성 유대의 이론과 실제
Theory and Practice of Female Bonding in The Coquette and Charlotte Temple
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
This paper examines the way in which the discourse on female bonding and sisterhood constitutes a crux in understanding Foster's The Coquette and Rowson's Charlotte Temple, both of which apparently take the form of seduction novels. The Republican ideology defined women's sphere as belonging to the home, consequently confining women only to the domestic realm. Accordingly, as women shared domesticity and maternity within the family, the discourse of female bonding prevailed as a subculture of women's life. In theory, given their authority over the domestic realm, women could wield great power in the home, and female bonding could constitute a subversive possibility for feminist consciousness among women. In practice, however, the Republican ideology and the idea of female bonding did not allow any real agency of female power. This contradiction between theory and practice is well demonstrated in The Coquette and Charlotte Temple.In The Coquette, the heroine's female friends fail to prevent Eliza's fall into seduction. They supervise Eliza's behavior, but to no avail. In Charlotte Temple, the only possible friend for the heroine also fails to help her in her most serious plight. The failure of the idea of female bonding seems to reinforce the didactic educative function of these seduction novels. However, the idea of female bonding and sisterhood embedded in these novels poses an alternative to male-oriented dominant discourse, emphasizing the need for an acute awareness of the limitations imposed on women by the dominant gender ideology of post-Revolutionary America. In Charlotte Temple, the incessant intervention of the maternal narrator who urges the supposedly female readers to sympathize with Charlotte's tragic story points out the need for a more subversive kind of female bonding.
참고문헌 (20)
- "States of Sympathy:Seduction and Democracy in the American Novel" (1997), Columbia UP
- "Narrative Intrusion in Charlotte Temple: A Closet Feminist's Strategy in an American Novel", 23(1), pp.26~32 (2000)
- "The Seduction Novel of the Early Nation: A Call for Socio Political Reform" (1999), Michigan State UP
- "A Better Husband-Single Women in America The Generations of 1780-1840" (1984)
- ".The Bonds of Womanhood:Woman's Sphere in New England 1780-1835" (1977), Yale UP
- "Charlotte Temple and the End of Epistolarity", pp.225~41 (1991)
- "The Coquette The Power of Sympathy and The Coquette", pp.105~242 (1996), Penguin
- ""Hanna Webster Foster's The Coquette: Critiquing Franklin's America" Redefining the Political Novel: American Women Writers, 1797-1901.", pp.1~22 (1995), U of Tennessee P
- "The Voice of the Preceptress: Female Education in and as the Seduction Novel", 37(1), pp.59~68 (2004)
- Kerber,Linda K, ".Women of the Republic:Intellect and Ideology in Revolutionary America" (1980), U of North Carolina P
- ""The Republican Wife:Virtue and Seduction in the Early Republic", 44, pp.689~721 (1987)
- ""Wise and Foolish Virgins:‘Usable Fiction' and the Early American Conduct Tradition", 25, pp.139~67 (1990)
- ""Sisterhood in a Separate Sphere:Female Friendship in Hannah Webster Foster's The Coquette and The Boarding School", 27, pp.185~203 (1992)
- "Charlotte Temple and Lucy Temple" (1991), Penguin
- "What's Wrong with Charlotte Temple", 60, pp.99~118 (2003)
- ""Toward a Republican Synthesis:The Emergence of an Understanding Republicanism in American Historiography", 29, pp.49~80 (1972)
- "The Female World of Love and Ritual Relations Between Women in Nineteenth-Century America A Heritage of Her Own Toward a New Social History of American Women", pp.311~42 (1979)
- "The Plight of Feeling:Sympathy and Dissent in the Early American Novel" (1997), U of Chicago P
- "I can step out of myself a little Feminine Virtue and Female Friendship in Hannah Foster's The Coquette Parallels and Intersections in Literature and Life", pp.97~111 (1993)
- "The Creation of the American Republic U of North Carolina P", pp.1776~1787 (1969)
