A Comparative Study on the Differences of Patent Protection Systems between China and the United States in International Trade: Focusing on China TOLLEA as an Example of the Collective Attack and Oppression of US Companies
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Based on the results of the ‘337 investigation of unfair acts’ conducted by the United States International Trade Commission (ITC), China was categorized as the highest percentage in Asia. Through this investigation, Chinese companies that entered the United States suffered significant losses due to the unfair sales suspension and high cost of investigation’s evidence. For example, Chinese TOLLEA company suffered serious damage from the 337 investigation despite filing a patent application in the United States. Even though the disputes also arise in China, additional damage was caused by the lack of legal remedies in China. Through these circumstances, we found that Chinese companies were not protected by patents both local and international. Using the fourth revision of China’s upcoming Intellectual Property Law (related to the upcoming patent law) this paper aim to recommend the preparation of local and international legal support protection for China in abroad especially in the United States. To make an accurate patent decision on domestic patent protection, the government must amend the laws supporting the role of administrative agents, encourage the experts and giving fair judgments to reduce unreasonable situations that might occur due to inadequate systems.
Abstract
Based on the results of the ‘337 investigation of unfair acts’ conducted by the United States International Trade Commission (ITC), China was categorized as the highest percentage in Asia. Through this investigation, Chinese companies that entered the United States suffered significant losses due to the unfair sales suspension and high cost of investigation’s evidence. For example, Chinese TOLLEA company suffered serious damage from the 337 investigation despite filing a patent application in the United States. Even though the disputes also arise in China, additional damage was caused by the lack of legal remedies in China. Through these circumstances, we found that Chinese companies were not protected by patents both local and international. Using the fourth revision of China’s upcoming Intellectual Property Law (related to the upcoming patent law) this paper aim to recommend the preparation of local and international legal support protection for China in abroad especially in the United States. To make an accurate patent decision on domestic patent protection, the government must amend the laws supporting the role of administrative agents, encourage the experts and giving fair judgments to reduce unreasonable situations that might occur due to inadequate systems.
참고문헌 (25)
- Bruno G Simes, "What’s the deference? why the federal circuit’s treatment of itc section 337cases raises agency-specific precedent concerns", The Kansas Journal of Law＆ Public Policy (2013)
- Chang, Yan, "An Analysis of the Perfection of the Intellectual Property Protection System in China’s Foreign Trade - Based on “Section 337” in Sino-US Intellectual Property Trade Disputes", Journal of Qiqihar University (2010)
- Deng, Jianzhi, "Provisions of TRIPS Agreement on Administrative Protection of IPRs as Well as the Implications", IPR (2003)
- Dong, Tao, "Research on the loopholes of patent protection network and the means to remedy them", Modern Law (2016)
- Fan, Wei, "The Issue of “Going Global” Enterprises Protecting Their Rights Overseas — Anin-depth Investigation of Zhejiang TOLLEA Group’s Intellectual Property Rights Protection Abroad", Zhejiang Economy (2011)
- Jack Q Lever, "Unfair methods of competition in import trade: actions before the international trade commission", The Business Lawyer (1986)
- Ji Yu, "On China’s Administrative Handling Mechanism for Patent Infringement Disputes as Well as Its Improvement", IPR (2011)
- Liu, Yinliang, "On the Drawbacks of Administrative Handling of Patent Infringement Disputes: Historical Choice and Re-choice", IPR (2016)
- Marisa A Pagnattaro, "The long arm of section337:international trade law as a global business remedy", American Business Law Journal (2015)
- Mou, Yan, "An Empirical Study on US Section 337 Investigations Strategies – from the Case of Chinese Export Enterprises", pp.2007
- Japan’s Strategy to Deal with “Section 337 Investigations” as Well as Its Enlightenment, "Peng, Hongbin", Beijing Institute of Technology, ~ (2013)
- U.S. International Protection of IPR Rights and Sino-US 337 Disputes, "Tang, Xiaoyun", World Economic Research, ~ (2006)
- Tang, Jianjie, "Legal Issues Faced by Chinese Enterprises in 337 Investigation – A Case Study of SI Group v. Sino Legend Chemical", Master, pp.2018
- Wu, Chenxiao, "Institutional Differences of Patent Rights Protection in Sino-US Trade: A Case-based Comparative Study", China Soft Science (2017)
- Shao, Xing, "When Legitimate Rights Protection Becomes a Capital Competition - Starting from TOLLEA Confronting with Litigation Encirclement and Suppression", The Merchandise and Quality (2012)
- Zhang, Ping, "Game of Industrial Interests - US Section 337 Investigations" (2010), Law Press
- Zhang, Jun, "The First Case of China’s Intellectual Property Rights Overseas Rights Safeguarding Victory by “Playing Both Ends against the Middle” - A Record of Zhejiang TOLLEA Group’s Overseas Rights Safeguarding Road", China Business Update (2011)
- Zhong, Shan, "Rules on U.S. Section 337 Investigations, Practices and Cases" (2012), Intellectual Property Publishing House
- "bjgy.chinacourt.gov.cn"[URL]
- "Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China"[URL]
- "NationalFireProtectionAssociation"[URL]
- "Patent Reexamination Board of SIPO"[URL]
- "Enforcement Measures for Patent Administrative Law"[URL]
- "Explanation of the Second Amendment to the Patent Law"[URL]
- "Enterprise Profile"[URL]