‘말할 수 없는 것들’의 부정성 —수전 글래스펄의『하찮은 것들』
Negativity, or the Justice for the Unsayable: Susan Glaspell’s Trifles
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A staple of feminist literary anthologies which was instrumental in reevaluating the writer Susan Glaspell, Trifles(1916) has received numerous comments from feminist scholars so far. Most of them tend to concentrate on the themes of female solidarity and justice challenging the androcentric system of law and order. Lacking in the plethora of thematic approaches to the play’s feminist subject, however, are formal analyses considering the way in which the play’s generic form assists in communicating such thematic concerns of feminism. An alternative to the typical scenario at the courtroom whose mistreatment of women must have loomed large to the young Glaspell as she revisited the old trial of a midwestern murderess which she had covered as a journalist for a local newspaper in Iowa, Trifles serves as a corrective to the courtroom dynamics offering a ‘dramatic justice’ as opposed to a strictly legal procedure. What this article discovers at the heart of this dramatic justice is the celebration of the unsayable, or what Wolfgang Iser termed negativity, of women’s experience which has no room for reflection in the legal discourse at the courtroom tyrannized by the sayable and the evident. Examining how the dramatic form of Trifles gives a voice to the unsayable of woman’s experience, which can not be properly represented at the courtroom governed by the straightforward and definitive male rhetoric, the article argues that the play is a better form than its fictional adaptation “A Jury of Her Peers”(1917) in that it syntactically suppresses the monopolizing operation of the verbal by giving precedence to the scenic and non-verbal which is constituted of setting, props, gesture and eye contacts. As a theoretical frame of reference with which to examine the modes of the unsayable in the play the article brings the concept of ‘negativity,’ defined by Iser as textual effects or modes of the unspeakable and unsaid, into the discussion of the taciturnity of the absent heroine and the non-verbal representation of drama.
Abstract
A staple of feminist literary anthologies which was instrumental in reevaluating the writer Susan Glaspell, Trifles(1916) has received numerous comments from feminist scholars so far. Most of them tend to concentrate on the themes of female solidarity and justice challenging the androcentric system of law and order. Lacking in the plethora of thematic approaches to the play’s feminist subject, however, are formal analyses considering the way in which the play’s generic form assists in communicating such thematic concerns of feminism. An alternative to the typical scenario at the courtroom whose mistreatment of women must have loomed large to the young Glaspell as she revisited the old trial of a midwestern murderess which she had covered as a journalist for a local newspaper in Iowa, Trifles serves as a corrective to the courtroom dynamics offering a ‘dramatic justice’ as opposed to a strictly legal procedure. What this article discovers at the heart of this dramatic justice is the celebration of the unsayable, or what Wolfgang Iser termed negativity, of women’s experience which has no room for reflection in the legal discourse at the courtroom tyrannized by the sayable and the evident. Examining how the dramatic form of Trifles gives a voice to the unsayable of woman’s experience, which can not be properly represented at the courtroom governed by the straightforward and definitive male rhetoric, the article argues that the play is a better form than its fictional adaptation “A Jury of Her Peers”(1917) in that it syntactically suppresses the monopolizing operation of the verbal by giving precedence to the scenic and non-verbal which is constituted of setting, props, gesture and eye contacts. As a theoretical frame of reference with which to examine the modes of the unsayable in the play the article brings the concept of ‘negativity,’ defined by Iser as textual effects or modes of the unspeakable and unsaid, into the discussion of the taciturnity of the absent heroine and the non-verbal representation of drama.
참고문헌 (29)
- Alkalay-Gut, Karen, "‘A Jury of Her Peers’: The Importance of Trifles", Studies in Short Fiction, 21(1), pp.1~9 (1984)
- Beckett, Samuel, "Not I. Samuel Beckett: The Complete Dramatic Works", pp.373~383 (1986), Faber
- Ben-Zvi, Linda, "Susan Glaspell: Essays on Her Theater and Fiction" (1995), U of Michigan P
- Ben-Zvi, Linda, "‘Murder She Wrote’: The Genesis of Susan Glaspell’s Trifles", pp.19~48, Ben-Zvi
- Bigsby, C. W. E., "Plays by Susan Glaspell" (1987), Cambridge UP
- Bigsby, C. W. E., "Introduction", pp.1~31, Bigsby
- Budick, Sanford, "Tradition in the Space of Negativity", pp.297~322, Budick and Iser
- Budick, Sanford, "Languages of the Unsayable: The Play of Negativity in Literature and Literary Theory" (1989), Columbia UP
- Budick, Sanford, "Introduction", pp.xi~xxi, Budick and Iser
- Cixous, Hélène, "The Feminist Reader: Essays in Gender and the Politics of Literary Criticism", pp.101~116 (1989), Macmillan
- Culler, Jonathan, "Apostrophe in: The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction", pp.135~154 (1981), Routledge & Kegan Paul
- Dymkowski, Christine, "On the Edge: The Plays of Susan Glaspell", Modern Drama, 31, pp.91~105 (1988)
- Fetterley, Judith, "Reading about Reading: ‘A Jury of Her Peers,’ ‘The Murders in the Rue Morgue,’ and ‘The Yellow Paper.’ in: Gender and Reading: Essays on Readers, Text and Contexts", pp.147~164 (1986), The Johns Hopkins UP
- Gainor, J. Ellen, "Susan Glaspell in Context: American Theater, Culture, and Politics 1915-48" (2001), U of Michigan P
- Glaspell, Susan, "The Road to the Temple" (1927), Stokes
- Glaspell, Susan, "Trifles", pp.35~45, Bigsby
- Glaspell, Susan, "A Jury of Her Peers in: Lifted Masks and Other Works", pp.279~306 (1993), U of Michigan P
- Hedges, Elaine, "Small Things Reconsidered: ‘A Jury of Her Peers", pp.49~69, Ben-Zvi
- Hinz-Bode, Christina, "Susan Glaspell and the Anxiety of Expression: Language and Isolation in the Plays" (2006), McFarland
- Ibsen, Henrik, "A Doll House. Four Major Plays: Volume I", pp.41~114 (1992), Signet
- Iser, Wolfgang, "The Play of the Text", pp.325~339, Budick and Iser
- Johnson, Barbara, "Apostrophe, Animation, and Abortion in: A World of Difference", pp.184~199 (1987), The Johns Hopkins UP
- Kolodny, Annette, "A Map for Rereading: Gender and the Interpretation of Literary Texts in: The New Feminist Criticism: Essays on Women, Literature & Theory", pp.46~62 (1985), Pantheon
- Melançon, Joseph, "Theater as Semiotic Practice", Modern Drama, 25(1), pp.17~24 (1982)
- Mustazza, Leonard, "Generic Translation and Thematic Shift in Susan Glaspell’s ‘Trifles’ and ‘A Jury of Her Peers.’", Studies in Short Fiction, 26(4), pp.489~96 (1989)
- Noe, Marcia, "Reconfiguring the Subject", Recuperating Realism: Susan Glaspell’s Unseen Women, 1995, pp.4(2), 36~54
- Radner, Joan N., "The Feminist Voice: Strategies of Coding in Folklore and Literature", Journal of American Folklore, 100, pp.412~425 (1987)
- Smith, Beverly A., "Women’s Work—Trifles?: The Skill and Insights of Playwright Susan Glaspell", International Journal of Women’s Studies, 5, pp.172~184 (1982)
- Stein, Karen, "The Women’s World of Glaspell’s Trifles in: Women in American Theatre", pp.253~256 (1981), Crown