본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Instructional Alignment Observation Protoc ol (IAOP) for Implementing the CCSSM Focus on the Practice Standard, “Model with Mathematics”

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study aimed to establish an observation protocol for mathematical modeling as an alternative way to examine instructional alignment to the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. The ins tructional alignment observation protocol (IAOP) for mathematical modeling was established through careful review s on the fidelity of implementation (FOI) framework and prior studies on mathematical modeling. I shared the initial version of the IAOP inclu ding 15 items across the structural and instructional critical components as the FOI framework suggested. Thus, the IAOP covers what teachers should do and know for practices of mathematical modeling in classrooms and what teachers and students are expect ed to do. Based on the findings in this study, validity and reliability of the IAOP should be evaluated in follow up studies.

Abstract

This study aimed to establish an observation protocol for mathematical modeling as an alternative way to examine instructional alignment to the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. The ins tructional alignment observation protocol (IAOP) for mathematical modeling was established through careful review s on the fidelity of implementation (FOI) framework and prior studies on mathematical modeling. I shared the initial version of the IAOP inclu ding 15 items across the structural and instructional critical components as the FOI framework suggested. Thus, the IAOP covers what teachers should do and know for practices of mathematical modeling in classrooms and what teachers and students are expect ed to do. Based on the findings in this study, validity and reliability of the IAOP should be evaluated in follow up studies.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Ball, D. L., "Content knowledge for teaching : What makes it special", Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), pp.389~407 (2008)[DOI]
  2. Barab, S. A., "Theoretical foundations of learning environments", pp.25~56 (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  3. Beach, R. W., "Issues in analyzing alignment of Langague Arts Common Core Standards with state standards", Educational Researcher, 40(4), pp.179~182 (2011)[DOI]
  4. New tools for analyzing teaching, curriculum and standards in mathematics & science. (National Science Foundation REC98-03080), "Blank, R. K.", Council of Chief State School Officers, ~ (2001)
  5. "Common core state standards implementation survey" (2015)[URL]
  6. Century, J., "A framework for measuring fidelity of implementation : A foundation for shared language and accumulation of knowledge", American Journal of Evaluation, 31(2), pp.199~218 (2010)
  7. Cobb, P., "Assessing the quality of the common core state standards for mathematics", Educational Researcher, 40(4), pp.183~185 (2011)[DOI]
  8. Cobb, P., "journey in mathematics education research: Insights from the work of Paul Cobb", pp.117~163 (2011), Srpinger
  9. "Standards in your state" (2015)[URL]
  10. Doerr, H. M., "A modeling perspective on students' mathematical reasoning about data", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), pp.110~136 (2003)[DOI]
  11. English, L. D., "Mathematical modeling in the primary school : Children's construction of a consumer guide", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, pp.303~323 (2006)[DOI]
  12. Hestenes, D., "Modeling students' mathematical modeling competencies", pp.13~41 (2010), Springer
  13. Jacobs, J. K., "Does eighth-grade mathematics teaching in the United States align with the NCTM standards? Results from the TIMSS 1995 and 1999 Video Studies", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(1), pp.5~32 (2006)
  14. Kanes, C., "The PISA mathematics regime : knowledge structures and practice of the self", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87, pp.145~165 (2014)[DOI]
  15. Lesh, R., "Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies: ICTMA 13", pp.5~10 (2013), Springer
  16. Martone, A., "Evaluating alignment between curriculum, assessment, and instruction", Review of Educational Research, 79(4), pp.1332~1361 (2009)[DOI]
  17. NCTM, ".", 2000
  18. "Common core state standards for mathematics" (2010)[URL]
  19. Polikoff, M. S., "Teacher education, experience, and the practice of aligned instruction", Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), pp.212~225 (2013)[DOI]
  20. Morgan S. Polikoff, "How Well Aligned Are Textbooks to the Common Core Standards in Mathematics?", American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), pp.1185~1211 (2015), American Educational Research Association (AERA)[DOI]
  21. Morgan S. Polikoff, "Instructional Alignment as a Measure of Teaching Quality", Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), pp.399~416 (2014), American Educational Research Association (AERA)[DOI]
  22. Porter, A. C., "Assessing the common core standards : Opportunities for improving measures of instruction", Educational Researcher, 40(4), pp.186~188 (2011)[DOI]
  23. Porter, A. C., "Common core standards : The new U. S. intended curriculum", Educational Researcher, 40(3), pp.103~116 (2011)[DOI]
  24. Roach, A. T., "Evaluating the alignment among curriculum, instruction, and assessment : Implications and applications for research and practice", Psychology in the Schools, 45(2), pp.158~176 (2008)[DOI]
  25. Ross, J. A., "A survey measuring elementary teachers' implementation of standards-based mathematics teaching", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(4), pp.344~363 (2003)
  26. Saunders, A. F., "Solving the common core equation : Teaching mathematics CCSS to students with moderate and severe disabilities", Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(3), pp.24~33 (2013)
  27. Sawada, D., "Measuring reform practices in science and mathematics classrooms : The reformed teaching observation protocol", School Science and Mathematics, 102(6), pp.245~253 (2002)
  28. Schmidt, W. H., "Curricular coherence and the common core state standards for mathematics", Educational Researcher, 41(8), pp.294~308 (2012)[DOI]
  29. Schoenfeld, A. H., "A US perspective on the implementation of inquiry-based learning in mathematics", ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, pp.901~909 (2013)[DOI]
  30. Simon, M. A., "Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), pp.114~145 (1995)
  31. Speiser, B., "Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies: ICTMA 13", pp.167~172 (2013), Springer
  32. Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education, "Webb, N. L", Council of Chief State School Officers, ~, pp.Research Monograph No. 6 (1997)
  33. White, D. Y., "Promoting productive mathematical classroom discourse with diverse students", Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, pp.37~53 (2003)[DOI]
  34. Zawojewski, J., "students’ mathematical modeling competencies: ICTMA 13", pp.237~244 (2013), Springer

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (2건)