본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Utilizing Teacher Noticing within a Representation of an Elementary Engineering Lesson to Support Responsive Teaching in the Classroom

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Teacher noticing has been termed consequential to teaching because what you see and do not see impacts decisions made within the classroom. Further, how a teacher r esponds to student thinking depends on what a teacher sees in student thinking. Within this study we sought to understand what teachers noticed within an engineering lesson and the decisions made as a result of that noticing. Findings indicate that student teachers and cooperating teachers drew on their pedagogical knowledge for decisions, rather than taking up the integrated content of student thinking and understanding. These findings serve as a guide for the experiences needed to engage in the complex wo rk of teaching or, more specifically, implementing engineering into instruction through a responsive teaching frame.

Abstract

Teacher noticing has been termed consequential to teaching because what you see and do not see impacts decisions made within the classroom. Further, how a teacher r esponds to student thinking depends on what a teacher sees in student thinking. Within this study we sought to understand what teachers noticed within an engineering lesson and the decisions made as a result of that noticing. Findings indicate that student teachers and cooperating teachers drew on their pedagogical knowledge for decisions, rather than taking up the integrated content of student thinking and understanding. These findings serve as a guide for the experiences needed to engage in the complex wo rk of teaching or, more specifically, implementing engineering into instruction through a responsive teaching frame.

참고문헌 (56)

  1. Amador, J. M., "Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks", pp.161~181 (2017), Springer
  2. Amador, J. M., "Prospective teachers’ noticing and mathematical decisions to respond : Using technology to approximate practice", International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(1), pp.3~22 (2021)
  3. Auerbach, A. J., "Teacher knowledge for active-learning instruction: Expert–novice comparison reveals differences", CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(1), pp.ar12~ (2018)
  4. Ball, D. L., "Building a common core for learning to teach : And connecting professional learning to practice", American Educator, 35(2), pp.17~21 (2011)
  5. Ball, D. L., "Handbook of research on teaching, 4", pp.433~456 (2001), Macmillan
  6. Barnhart, T., "Studying teacher noticing : Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers’ ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking", Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, pp.83~93 (2015)
  7. Banilower, E. R., "Report of the 2012 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education" (2013), Horizon Research
  8. Benedict-Chambers, A., "Using tools to promote novice teacher noticing of science teaching practices in post-rehearsal discussions", Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, pp.28~44 (2016)
  9. Berliner, D. C., "Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students", pp.141~186 (1994), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  10. Berliner, D. C., "Learning about and learning from expert teachers", International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), pp.463~482 (2001)
  11. Brophy, S., "Advancing engineering education in P‐12 classrooms", Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), pp.369~387 (2008)
  12. Capobianco, B. M., "STEM teachers’ planned and enacted attempts at implementing engineering design‐ based instruction", School Science and Mathematics, 114(6), pp.258~270 (2014)
  13. Carpenter, T. P., "Cognitively guided instruction : A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction", The Elementary School Journal, 97(1), pp.3~20 (1996)
  14. Chase, C. C., "Learning to notice science concepts in engineering activities and transfer situations", Science Education, 103(2), pp.440~471 (2019)
  15. Colestock, A. A., "Responsive teaching in science and mathematics", pp.144~162 (2016), Routledge
  16. Crotty, E. A., "Approaches to integrating engineering in STEM units and student achievement gains", Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research(J-PEER), 7(2), pp.1~14 (2017)
  17. Custer, R. L., "Professional development for teachers of engineering : Research and related activities", The Bridge, 39(3), pp.18~24 (2009)
  18. Dalvi, T., "Using student video cases to assess pre-service elementary teachers’ engineering teaching responsiveness", Research in Science Education, 47(5), pp.1101~1125 (2017)
  19. Daugherty, J. L., "Secondary level engineering professional development : Content, pedagogy, and challenges", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(1), pp.51~64 (2012)
  20. Desimone, L. M., "Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development : Toward better conceptualizations and measures", Educational Researcher, 38(3), pp.181~199 (2009)
  21. Diefes-Dux, H. A., "Engineering in precollege settings:Synthesizing research, policy, and practices", pp.233~257 (2014), Purdue University Press
  22. Dreher, A., "Teachers’ professional knowledge and noticing : The case of multiple representations in the mathematics classroom", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(1), pp.89~114 (2015)
  23. Erickson, F., "Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes", pp.47~64 (2011), Routledge
  24. Estapa, A. T., "Preservice teachers’ articulated noticing through pedagogies of practice", Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 21(4), pp.387~415 (2018)
  25. Estapa, A., "Video as a professional development tool to support novice teachers as they learn to teach English language learners", The New Educator, 12(1), pp.85~104 (2016)
  26. Estapa, A., "Supporting integrated STEM in the elementary classroom : A professional development approach centered on an engineering design challenge", International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), pp.1~16 (2017)
  27. Garet, M. S., "What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers", American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), pp.915~945 (2001)
  28. Guskey, T. R., "What works in professional development?", Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), pp.495~500 (2009)
  29. Guzey, S. S., "A high-quality professional development for teachers of grades 3–6 for implementing engineering into classrooms", School Science and Mathematics, 114(3), pp.139~149 (2014)
  30. Hammer, D., "Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom", Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 6(1), pp.51~72 (2012)
  31. Johnson, A. W., "Examining Experienced Teachers’ Noticing of and Responses to Students’ Engineering", Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research(J-PEER), 7(1), pp.25~35 (2017)
  32. Katehi, L., "National academy of engineering and national research council report: Engineering in K-12 education" (2009), National Academies.
  33. Kellman, P. J., "Psychology of learning and motivation Vol. 58", pp.117~165 (2013), Academic Press
  34. Lesseig, K., "Developing an interview module to support secondary pst’s noticing of student thinking", Mathematics Teacher Educator, 5(1), pp.29~46 (2016)
  35. Levin, D. M., "Novice teachers’ attention to student thinking", Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), pp.142~154 (2009)
  36. Luna, M. J., "Teachers’ noticing of students’ thinking in science through classroom artifacts: In what ways are science and engineering practices evident?", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(2), pp.148~172 (2018)
  37. McCormick, M., "Student videos as a tool for elementary teacher development in teaching engineering: What do teachers notice?", Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (2014)
  38. Miles, M. B., "Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook" (2014), Sage
  39. Moore, T. J., "A framework for quality K-12 engineering education : Research and development", Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research(J-PEER), 4(1), pp.1~13 (2014)
  40. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, "Principles and standards for school mathematics" (2000), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
  41. NGSS Lead States, "Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states" (2013), National Academies Press
  42. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, "Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics" (2001), National Academy Press
  43. National Research Council, "Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects" (2009), National Academies Press
  44. National Research Council, "A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas" (2012), National Academies Press
  45. Radloff, J., "Investigating changes in preservice teachers’ conceptions of STEM education following video analysis and reflection", School Science and Mathematics, 117(3-4), pp.158~167 (2017)
  46. Roberston, "Responsive teaching in science and mathematics", pp.1~35 (2016), Routledge
  47. Russ, R. S., "Inferring teacher epistemological framing from local patterns in teacher noticing", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), pp.284~314 (2013)
  48. Stockero, S. L., "Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks", pp.467~480 (2017), Springer
  49. Sun, J., "An exploratory study of the influence that analyzing teaching has on preservice teachers’ classroom practice", Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), pp.201~214 (2015)
  50. Tank, K. M., "Analysis of elements that support implementation of high‐ quality engineering design within the elementary classroom", School Science and Mathematics, 120(7), pp.379~390 (2020)
  51. van Es, E. A., "Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’eyes", pp.164~181 (2011), Routledge
  52. van Es, E. A., "Mathematics teachers’"learning to notice"in the context of a video club", Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), pp.244~276 (2008)
  53. Vattam, S. S., "On foundations of technological support for addressing challenges facing design-based science learning", Pragmatics & Cognition, 16(2), pp.406~437 (2008)
  54. Watkins, J., "Data‐based conjectures for supporting responsive teaching in engineering design with elementary teachers", Science Education, 102(3), pp.548~570 (2018)
  55. Wendell, K. B., "Noticing, assessing, and responding to students’ engineering: Exploring a responsive teaching approach to engineering design", Proceedings of the 123rd American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, pp.26~29 (2016)
  56. Windschitl, M., "Ambitious pedagogy by novice teachers:Who benefits from tool-supported collaborative inquiry into practice and why?", Teachers College Record, 113(7), pp.1311~1360 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)