Collaborative practices in virtual group work on dynamic geometry tasks
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The goal of this study is to explore productive ways to engage students in groupwork using dynamic geometry tasks in online synchronous classroom environments. In particular, we aim to understand the social, mathematical, and technological aspects of student collaboration in virtual spaces. We analyzed how three online groups of students collaboratively worked on dynamic geometry tasks of exploring interactive kaleidoscope applets in Desmos and producing visual representations and written descriptions of geometric transformations used in the applets. The students shared their screens in Zoom as they shared their findings and discussed how to draw and write to represent the kaleidoscopes. We identified three emerging practices of the students collaboratively working on dynamic geometry tasks in online synchronous environments: (a) drawing in response, (b) co-construction, and (c) writing in real time. The emergent practices captured how students socially interacted with others, engaged in mathematical processes, and utilized technology tools. We also discuss inequity in students’ participation in collaborative practices in an online environment and possible ways to ensure equitable learning opportunities for online students.
Abstract
The goal of this study is to explore productive ways to engage students in groupwork using dynamic geometry tasks in online synchronous classroom environments. In particular, we aim to understand the social, mathematical, and technological aspects of student collaboration in virtual spaces. We analyzed how three online groups of students collaboratively worked on dynamic geometry tasks of exploring interactive kaleidoscope applets in Desmos and producing visual representations and written descriptions of geometric transformations used in the applets. The students shared their screens in Zoom as they shared their findings and discussed how to draw and write to represent the kaleidoscopes. We identified three emerging practices of the students collaboratively working on dynamic geometry tasks in online synchronous environments: (a) drawing in response, (b) co-construction, and (c) writing in real time. The emergent practices captured how students socially interacted with others, engaged in mathematical processes, and utilized technology tools. We also discuss inequity in students’ participation in collaborative practices in an online environment and possible ways to ensure equitable learning opportunities for online students.
참고문헌 (50)
- Alqahtani, M. M., "Instrumental appropriation of a collaborative, dynamic-geometry environment and geometrical understanding", International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(2), pp.72~ (2016)
- Alqahtani, M. M., "Mediational activities in a dynamic geometry environment and teachers’ specialized content knowledge", Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, pp.77~94 (2017)[DOI]
- Alqahtani, M. M., "Teachers’ instrumentation of a collaborative dynamic geometry environment", Horizontes, 36(1), pp.171~182 (2018)[DOI]
- Akyol, Z., "The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course : Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence", Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3), pp.3~22 (2008)
- Arbaugh, J. B., "Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses", International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2), pp.1~21 (2008)[DOI]
- Ball, D. L., "Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide?", American Educator, 29(1), pp.14~17 (2005)
- Ball, D. L., "Content knowledge for teaching : What makes it special", Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), pp.389~407 (2008)[DOI]
- Barcelos, G. T., "Mediation in the construction of mathematical knowledge : A case study using dynamic geometry", Creative Education, 2(3), pp.252~263 (2011)[DOI]
- Barron, B., "Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups", Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), pp.403~436 (2000)[DOI]
- Bartolini Bussi, M. G., "Handbook of international research in mathematics education", pp.746~783 (2008), Routledge
- Bieda, K. N., "Entailments of productive disciplinary engagement in technology-enhanced mathematics classrooms", The 2020 American Education Research Association Annual Meeting (2020)
- Blatchford, P., "Toward a social pedagogy of classroom groupwork", International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1–2), pp.153~172 (2003)[DOI]
- Brufee, K. A., "Sharing our toys : Cooperative learning versus collaborative learning", Change : The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(1), pp.12~18 (1995)[DOI]
- Cohen, E. G., "Continuing to cooperate : Prerequisites for persistence", The Phi Delta Kappan, 72(2), pp.134~138 (1990)
- Cohen, E. G., "Producing equal status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom", American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), pp.99~120 (1995)[DOI]
- "Standards for mathematical practice" (2018)[URL]
- Edson, A. J., "Promoting collaboration and mathematical engagement in a digital learning environment", Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, pp.1243~1246 (2018), University of South Carolina & Clemson University
- Edson, A. J., "Connecting a teacher dashboard to a student digital collaborative environment : supporting teacher enactment of problem-based mathematics curriculum", ZDM Mathematics Education, 53, pp.1285~1298 (2021)[DOI]
- Furman, M., "Voice in an urban science video project", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), pp.667~695 (2006)
- Hegedus, S. J., "Accommodating the instrumental genesis framework within dynamic technological environments", For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(1), pp.26~31 (2010)
- Hill, H. C., "Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge : Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific of students", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), pp.372~400 (2008)
- Hill, H. C., "Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement", American Education Research Journal, 42(2), pp.371~406 (2005)[DOI]
- Hoyles, C., "The technological mediation of mathematics and its learning", Human Development, 52(2), pp.129~147 (2009)[DOI]
- Johnson, D. W., "Making cooperative learning work", Theory into Practice, 38(2), pp.67~73 (1999)[DOI]
- Koehler, M. J., "Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators", pp.2~29 (2008), The AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology
- Koschmann, T., "CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm", pp.1~23 (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Laborde, C., "The role and uses of technologies in mathematics classrooms: Between challenge and modus Vivendi", Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 7(1), pp.68~92 (2007)[DOI]
- Lappan, G., "Connected Mathematics 3" (2014), Pearson
- Levin, M., "Conceptualizing STEM majors’ developing agency and autonomy in undergraduate mathematics", The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020, 2, pp.887~888 (2020), International Society of the Learning Sciences
- Lonchamp, J., "An instrumental perspective on CSCL systems", International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(2), pp.211~237 (2012)[DOI]
- Mariotti, M. A., "Introduction to proof : The mediation of a dynamic environment", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1–2), pp.25~53 (2000)[DOI]
- Medina, R., "International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning", pp.199~218 (2021), Springer
- Miles, M. B., "Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook" (2014), SAGE Publication
- Mishra, P., "Technological pedagogical content knowledge : A framework for teacher knowledge", Teachers College Record, 108(6), pp.1017~1054 (2006)
- Hegedus, S. J., "Intersecting representation and communication infrastructures", ZDM, 41, pp.399~412 (2009)
- Patterson, A. D., "Equity in groupwork : The social process of creating justice in a science classroom", Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14, pp.361~381 (2019)[DOI]
- Rabardel, P., "Instrument mediated activity : From subject development to anthropocentric design", Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6(5), pp.429~461 (2005)[DOI]
- Richardson, J. C., "The next generation of distance education", pp.97~125 (2012), Springer
- Ruthven, K., "The didactical tetrahedron as a heuristic for analysing the incorporation of digital technologies into classroom practice in support of investigative approaches to teaching mathematics", ZDM Mathematics Education, 44, pp.627~640 (2012)[DOI]
- Sampson, V., "The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation", Science Education, 93(3), pp.448~484 (2009)[DOI]
- Sandoval, W. A., "Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students’ scientific explanations", Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), pp.5~51 (2003)[DOI]
- Simon, S., "Learning to teach argumentation : Research and development in the science classroom", International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), pp.235~260 (2006)[DOI]
- Sinclair, N., "To be or to become : How dynamic geometry changes discourse", Research in Mathematics Education, 10(2), pp.135~150 (2008)[DOI]
- Stahl, G., "Collaborative information environments to support knowledge construction by communities", AI & Society, 14, pp.71~97 (2000)[DOI]
- Stahl, G., "Integrating synchronous and asynchronous support for group cognition in online collaborative learning", the proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2008), pp.351~358 (2008), International Society of the Learning Sciences
- Stahl, G., "Constructing dynamic triangles together: The development of mathematical group cognition" (2016), Cambridge University Press
- Stein, M. K., "Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason : An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project", Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(1), pp.50~80 (1996)[DOI]
- Stephens, G. E., "Facilitating collaboration in online groups", Journal of Educators Online, 14(1), pp.1~16 (2017)
- Tomaszewski, S., "Modifying the didactical tetrahedron to describe aspects of mathematical digital collaborative learning", Thirteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME13) (2023), Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics; Eötvös Loránd University of Budapest
- Webb, N., "The international handbook of collaborative learning", pp.19~40 (2013), Routledge
