범주화의 고전이론과 원형이론 비교연구
Comparative Study of Classical Theory and Prototype Theory of the Categorization
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims at comparative study of classical theory and prototype theory of the categorization. The claim of cognitive linguists, which many concepts simply do not have defining features, originates from difference of the point of view of defining features. Defining features of the categorization not maximum features, that all members of category include, but minimum features, that can satisfy all members of category. And difference of clearness and unclearness of category boundaries comes from difference of the point of view of category division. Clearness of category boundaries comes from the principle of contradiction and the principle of excluded middle and this is the basic logics of category division. But unclearness of category boundaries comes from unusual phenomenons of actual reality. And difference of identity and gradability of value of category members is difference of the point of view to category domain. For example, although the category CHAIR has actual and various chairs in reality, but we recognize them as a one ‘chair’ and same value. But mambers of ‘furniture’, for example, chair, sofa, telephone etc, can be divided as goodness-of-examples or badness-of-examples of the category FURNITURE. If we do not recognize identity of value of category members, we claim, that categorization is impossible. And Prototype theory, that has been proposed as an alternative to classical view, was discarded by E. Rosch. This showed that the prototype theory is hard to admit as incorrect theory for categorization. So, classical Theory and Prototype Theory are not mutually exclusive, but complementary theories. we suggest that it is necessary to recognize and accept the classical theory and the prototype theory for categorization
Abstract
This study aims at comparative study of classical theory and prototype theory of the categorization. The claim of cognitive linguists, which many concepts simply do not have defining features, originates from difference of the point of view of defining features. Defining features of the categorization not maximum features, that all members of category include, but minimum features, that can satisfy all members of category. And difference of clearness and unclearness of category boundaries comes from difference of the point of view of category division. Clearness of category boundaries comes from the principle of contradiction and the principle of excluded middle and this is the basic logics of category division. But unclearness of category boundaries comes from unusual phenomenons of actual reality. And difference of identity and gradability of value of category members is difference of the point of view to category domain. For example, although the category CHAIR has actual and various chairs in reality, but we recognize them as a one ‘chair’ and same value. But mambers of ‘furniture’, for example, chair, sofa, telephone etc, can be divided as goodness-of-examples or badness-of-examples of the category FURNITURE. If we do not recognize identity of value of category members, we claim, that categorization is impossible. And Prototype theory, that has been proposed as an alternative to classical view, was discarded by E. Rosch. This showed that the prototype theory is hard to admit as incorrect theory for categorization. So, classical Theory and Prototype Theory are not mutually exclusive, but complementary theories. we suggest that it is necessary to recognize and accept the classical theory and the prototype theory for categorization
참고문헌 (27)
- 권영수, "프로토타입 의미론의 보편성", 독일어문학, 10(3), pp.351~370 (2002), 한국독일어문학회
- 김진우, "인지언어학의 이해" (1999), 한국문화사
- 문미선, "범주화의 원형모형과 응용가능성", 독일어문학, 12(1), pp.261~282 (2004), 한국독일어문학회
- 이기동, "낱말의 의미와 범주화", 동방학지, pp.289~332 (1986)
- 이용권, "러시아어 단어 기호의 명명과정 연구", 슬라브어 연구, 13, pp.33~48 (2008), 한국슬라브어학회
- 임지룡, "원형이론과 의미의 범주화", 국어학, 23, pp.41~68 (1993)
- Aitchison,J, "Words in the Mind. An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon 2nd Edition" (1994), BLACKWELL
- Evans, V, "인지언어학 기초" (2008), 한국문화사
- Lakoff, G, "Woman, Fire, and dangerous things" (1987), University of Chicago Press
- Laurence, S, "Concepts and cognitive science.’ In Concepts: Core Readings" (1999), MIT Press
- Lyons, J, "Introduction to theoretical Linguistics" (1968), Cambridge University Press
- Rosch, E, "Principles of Categorization in Cognition and categorization", pp.189~206 (1999), MIT Press
- Rosch,E, "Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), pp.192~233 (1975)
- Rosch, E, "Basic objects in natural categories", Cognitive psychology, 8, pp.382~439 (1976)
- Rosch, E, "Family Resemblances: Studies in the internal Structure of Categories", Cognitive psychology, 7, pp.573~605 (1975)
- Smith, E, "Categories and Concepts" (1981), Harvard University Press
- Taylor, J.R, "Linguistic Categorization" (2007), University Press
- Ungeger, F, "인지언어학 개론" (1998), 태학사
- Wittgenstein, L, "Philosophical Investigation, Sections 66 In Concepts: Core Readings", pp.171~174 (2000), The MIT Press
- Кубрякова, Е.С, "Начальные этапы становления когнитивизма: Лингвистика - Психология - конгитивная наука", Вопросы Языкознания, 4, pp.34~47 (1994)
- Кубрякова, Е.С, "Семантика в когнитивной лингвистике (О концепте контейнера и формах его объективации в языке)", Известия АН Серия Литературы и Языка, 5(6), pp.3~12 (1999)
- Кубрякова, Е.С, "Когнитивная лингвистика и проблемы композиционной семантики в сфере словообразования", Известия АН Серия Литературы и Языка, 61(1), pp.13~24 (2002)
- Кубрякова, Е.С, "Об установках когнитивной науки и актуальных проблемах когнитивной лингвистики", Известия АН Серия Литературы и Языка, 63(3), pp.3~12 (2004)
- Кубрякова, Е.С, "Образы мира в сознании человека и словообразовательные категории как их составляющие", Известия АН Серия Литературы и Языка, 65(2), pp.3~13 (2006)
- Рахилина, Е.В, "Когнитивная семантика: историяю персоналии. идеи. результаты. в кн.: Семиотика и информатика, Сборник научных статей", Выпуск, 36, pp.274~323 (1989), Языки русской культуры
- Рахилина, Е.В, "О тенденциях в развитии когнитивной семантики", Известия АН Серия литературы и языка, 59(3), pp.3~15 (2000)