김정일의 북한 문화예술의 지도 원리와 양상 고찰

Abstract

Official government culture and pursue of artistic aesthetic sense are totally different concepts because artistic imagination has a base on denial and deviation of official government culture. The art is in the system but dream the outside of system. However, the dream at this moment means a mirror to reflect oppression and deviation of society not apart from the society. The art shows which is the shortage and oppressive factors of the society through display negative things. So we know oppression and negative things in normal life which we can not aware of them through appreciation of artistic works. Namely the art comes into bud in the injustice toward official government system. But Jungil Kim made a contradictory concept of official leadership order and artistic self regulation as one thing. The art as a propaganda agitation business, '"Youngdo art' is the one. He utilized factors of esthetic sympathy through experimental homogeneity of art works as the methodology of propaganda agitation to make Ilsung Kim as a hero and to last self-reliance era. Jungil Kim made a base to go forward in the competition with his uncle Youngju Kim where Ilsung Kim decided who to trust. Of course the cultural art he pursues links with power conflict to be appointed as a successor and focuses on functional aspect of leader shape, ruling policy of the party and propaganda cultural business of ideology. Therefore, cultural art in North Korea became diagramming of dogmatism, conventionality, rigidity expeditiously. Also, the series about cultural art in 1990s was written with the purpose of internal integrity required in the situation of political systemic crisis after Eastern community countries including Soviet Union collapsed. So the art can not get out of closed ruling ideology diagramming. After mid 1990, 'A March of hardship'(1994) and 'Good King'(1995) based on revolutionary military spirit shows literature in North Korean does not have a room to have a esthetic sense. The influence of Jungil Kim will continue to detailed factors of overall creation of cultural art. Therefore, Dance art theory, Music art theory, Art theory, Self literature theory as well as Movie art theory by Jungil Kim will exist as the theory of cultural art as long as his ruling continues based on self reliance ideology. However, we can think imaginative future. Cultural art of Jungil Kim so far proceed in the position of leader of communism revolution and construction of North Korea, but I think artistic side existing inside would be shown to the front in the future. We should think this deeply with political situation in Korean peninsula and changing situation of society system in North Korea. Their writing is the details of agent literature theory based on agent ideology of North Korea and is helpful to understand leadership principle and propensity of North Korean cultural and art of Jungil Kim in the concrete. The research especially examines the possibility to overcome diagram and stereotype as government discussion of North Korean cultural art in mind. Jungil Kim's literature insight is continually linked with government intention and on the other hand, that is to search possibility to show his liberal and artistic inclination. Second, when the cultural art of North Korea gets out of standardized stereotype as government discussion, its artistic achievement and value as unification literature could have value as asset. In the future literature as official system discussion stereotyped in North Korea will be evaporated easily supposing reunification based on a sole official system with the Ilsung Kim and Jungil Kim on the top would not be happened. Therefore the understanding of North Korean cultural art should be paid attention and evaluated on its possibility of change as well as truth confirmation.