담화분석을 통한 컴퓨터 기반 말하기 수행평가의 타당성 조사
The Investigation of Validation of Computer Based Oral Test Using Discourse Analysis
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigated the validation of the computer based oral test using discourse analysis. 48 Korean university students participated in the study took a face-to-face interview and a computer-based oral test. Their performances were video- and computer-recorded and transcribed for analysis. The performances were scored and their discourse was analyzed in terms of discourse factors including errors of lexis and syntax, communication strategies, and discourse markers. The findings were as follows: First, the performances in a computer-based oral test had strong connection with those in a face-to-face interview. Secondly, students’ errors of lexis and syntax, communication strategies, and discourse markers in a computer-based oral test correlated with those in the other test except the morphological error. Thirdly, differences were found between the discourse factors not only in two-way tasks but also in one-way tasks of the two tests. Lastly, weak relationship between scores and discourse factors was shown in one-way tasks of the computer-based oral test
Abstract
This study investigated the validation of the computer based oral test using discourse analysis. 48 Korean university students participated in the study took a face-to-face interview and a computer-based oral test. Their performances were video- and computer-recorded and transcribed for analysis. The performances were scored and their discourse was analyzed in terms of discourse factors including errors of lexis and syntax, communication strategies, and discourse markers. The findings were as follows: First, the performances in a computer-based oral test had strong connection with those in a face-to-face interview. Secondly, students’ errors of lexis and syntax, communication strategies, and discourse markers in a computer-based oral test correlated with those in the other test except the morphological error. Thirdly, differences were found between the discourse factors not only in two-way tasks but also in one-way tasks of the two tests. Lastly, weak relationship between scores and discourse factors was shown in one-way tasks of the computer-based oral test
참고문헌 (26)
- 신동일, "한국의 영어평가학: 말하기시험편 2" (2006), 한국문화사
- 주미진, "영어 말하기 평가의 채점자 신뢰성과 편향성 조사: 구술 인터뷰, 컴퓨터 구술시험, 버슨트의 비교를 통하여", 영어교육, 69(2), pp.247~270 (2014), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
- 주미진, "컴퓨터 매개 영어 말하기 시험이 수험자 발화에 미치는 영향 조사: 정확성, 유창성, 복잡성을 중심으로", 영어학, 11(3), pp.677~699 (2011), 한국영어학회[DOI]
- 최연희, "담화분석과 영어교육", Studies in English Education, 3(1), pp.523~543 (1998), 글로벌영어교육학회
- Allwright, D., "The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistic 3", pp.969~973 (1994), Oxford University Press
- Brown, A., "Test Development Process: Test-takers’ reactions to a Tape-mediated Test of Proficiency in Spoken Japanese", Language Testing, 10, pp.277~303 (1993)
- Brown, G., "Discourse Analysis" (1983), Cambridge University Press
- Celce-Murcia, M., "Discourse Analysis and Grammar Instruction", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 11, pp.135~151 (1991)
- Clark, J. L. D., "Validation of a Tape-mediated ACTFL", ILR Scale-based Test of Chinese Speaking Proficiency, 1988, pp.5, 187~198
- Connor, U., "Discourse Analysis and Writing", Reading Instruction, 1991, pp.11, 164~180
- Dingmin, W., "Teaching Reading Comprehension on a Discourse Level: Discourse Framework and its Applications", Guidelines, 14(2), pp.36~42 (1992)
- Douglas, D., "Quantity and Quality in Speaking Test Performance", Language Testing, 11, pp.125~144 (1994)
- Foster, P., "The Influence of Planning and Task-type on Second Language Performance", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, pp.299~323 (1996)
- 주미진, "The attitudes of students’ and teachers’ toward a Computerized Oral Test (COT) and a Face-To-Face Interview (FTFI) in a Korean u", 언어과학, 14(2), pp.171~193 (2007), 한국언어과학회
- Kenyon, D. M., "Comparing Examinee Attitudes toward Computer-assisted and Other Oral Proficiency Assessments", Language Learning and Technology, 5, pp.60~83 (2001)
- Lazaraton, A., "Studies in Language Testing 14: A Qualitative Approach to the Validation of Oral Language Tests" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- McCarthy, M., "Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers" (1991), Cambridge University Press
- McHoul, A., "The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 3", pp.940~949 (1994), Oxford University Press
- O'Loughlin, K., "Studies in Language Testing 13: The Equivalence of Direct and Semi-direct Speaking Tests" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Riggenbach, H., "Discourse Analysis and Spoken Language Instruction", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 11, pp.152~163 (1990)
- Schiffrin, D., "Approaches to Discourse" (1994), Basil Blackwell
- Schwartz. J., "Discourse Analysis in Second Language Research", pp.138~153 (1980), Newbury House
- Shohamy, E., "The Validity of Direct versus Semi Direct Oral Tests", Language Testing, 7, pp.99~123 (1994)
- Tannen, D., "Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse" (1989), Cambridge University Press
- Van Lier, L., "Reeling, Writhing, Drawling, Stretching, and Fainting in Coils: Oral Proficiency Interviews as Conversation", TESOL Quarterly, 23, pp.489~508 (1989)
- Young, R., "Conversational Styles in Language Proficiency Interviews", Language Learning, 45, pp.3~42 (1995)