On the Derivation of the Two Specs of T in Icelandic MSCs
On the Derivation of the Two Specs of T in Icelandic MSCs
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
To derive the correct word order of the double Specs of T in Icelandic MSCs, Chomsky (1995) suggested that T is strong and tolerates a single unforced violation of Procrastinate. However, under the mechanism of the Attract F theory, not only the Subj but also the Obj in MSCs can raise to the Spec of T to check off the strong features of T after stopping by the outer Spec of v. Hence, the undesirable double EPP constructions with no Exp cannot be barred under the Attract F theory. To avoid this problem, I will suggest an alternative account, based on Chomsky's (2000, 2001, 2004) suggestion that a phrase is frozen in place after its structural Case is checked and deleted under Agree between probe and goal. I will show how this suggestion makes it possible to derive the correct word order of the double Specs of T in Icelandic MSCs.
Abstract
To derive the correct word order of the double Specs of T in Icelandic MSCs, Chomsky (1995) suggested that T is strong and tolerates a single unforced violation of Procrastinate. However, under the mechanism of the Attract F theory, not only the Subj but also the Obj in MSCs can raise to the Spec of T to check off the strong features of T after stopping by the outer Spec of v. Hence, the undesirable double EPP constructions with no Exp cannot be barred under the Attract F theory. To avoid this problem, I will suggest an alternative account, based on Chomsky's (2000, 2001, 2004) suggestion that a phrase is frozen in place after its structural Case is checked and deleted under Agree between probe and goal. I will show how this suggestion makes it possible to derive the correct word order of the double Specs of T in Icelandic MSCs.
참고문헌 (13)
- "On an alleged argument for the Proper Binding Condition", 43, pp.1~16 (2001)
- "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
- "Minimalist inquiries-The framework:Step by step-Essays in minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
- "Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale:A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
- "Beyond explanatory adequacy:Structures and beyond,", Vol. 3, pp.104~131 (2004), Oxford University Press
- "On trace theory", 8, pp.35~62 (1977)
- "Specs of subjects The role of TP in Icelandic In Papers on Case and agreement I MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18 Department of Linguistics and Philosophy", pp.59~98 (1993)
- "The linguistic relevance of Tree Adjoining Grammar Department of Computer and Information Science University of Pennsylvania" (1985)
- "Existential constructions and the Proper Binding Condition", Volume II, pp.175~178 (2002), Seoul
- ":Dimensions of movement", pp.189~208 (2002), Amsterdam: John Benjamins
- "Proceedings of The 2000 International Workshop on Generative Grammar", pp.141~153 (2000)
- "In MIT working papers in linguistics 19", pp.337~399 (1993)
- "Varieties of raising and the feature-based bare phrase structure theory" (1994)