본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

MaxElide and Parallelism: Don't we need both?

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Fox and Lasnik (2003) propose a Parallelism condition as a licensing condition on ellipsis. The data it intends to cover, however, are also accounted for by MaxElide, which is independently proposed by Merchant (2008). Thus, one could argue that one subsumes the other (cf. Parker and Seely 2010) or attempt to unify these two constraints (cf. Takahashi and Fox 2005). However, this paper shows that these attempts are not promising, by demonstrating that the two constraints are independently operative and thus needed as licensing conditions on ellipsis. The arguments come from a certain contrast between VP-ellipsis and IP-ellipsis in various ellipsis environments. This paper also shows that to capture the whole range of relevant data, the derivation involved in Pseudogapping must be posited (cf. Lasnik 1995, Johnson 2001).

Abstract

Fox and Lasnik (2003) propose a Parallelism condition as a licensing condition on ellipsis. The data it intends to cover, however, are also accounted for by MaxElide, which is independently proposed by Merchant (2008). Thus, one could argue that one subsumes the other (cf. Parker and Seely 2010) or attempt to unify these two constraints (cf. Takahashi and Fox 2005). However, this paper shows that these attempts are not promising, by demonstrating that the two constraints are independently operative and thus needed as licensing conditions on ellipsis. The arguments come from a certain contrast between VP-ellipsis and IP-ellipsis in various ellipsis environments. This paper also shows that to capture the whole range of relevant data, the derivation involved in Pseudogapping must be posited (cf. Lasnik 1995, Johnson 2001).

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Bach, Emmon, "Anaphora and Semantic Structure", Proceedings the Chicago Linguistic Society, 16 (1980), Parasession on Anaphora
  2. Boeckx,Cedric, "Islands and chains: resumption as stranding" (2003), John Benjamins.
  3. Bošković,Željko, "A-movement and the EPP", Syntax, 5, pp.167~218 (2002)
  4. On the locality of Move and Agree: Eliminating the Activation Condition, Generalized EPP, Inverse Filter, and the Phase-Impenetrability Condition, "Bošković,Željko", In UConn Working Papers Occasional Papaers in Linguistics, ~ (2005)
  5. Chomsky,Noam, "Barriers" (1986), MIT Press
  6. Chomsky,Noam, "A minimalist program for linguistic theory" (1993), MIT Press
  7. Chomsky, Noam, "The theory of principles and parameters. In Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research", pp.506~569 (1993), Walter de Gruyter
  8. Chung, Sandra, "Sluicing and Logical Form", Natural Language Semantics, 3, pp.239~282 (1995)
  9. Lasnik,Howard, "A note on Pseudogapping", MITWPL, 27, pp.143~163 (1995)
  10. Lasnik,Howard, "When can you save a structure by destroying it?", NELS, 31 (2001), University of Massachusettes
  11. Lasnik, Howard, "Extraction out of ellipsis and locality: Evidence from pseudogapping and VP ellipsis in English", Linguistic Inquiry, XXX
  12. Fingo, Robert, "Indices and Identity" (1994), MIT Press and MITWPL
  13. Fox,Danny, "Economy and Semantic Interpretation" (2000), MIT Press
  14. Fox, Danny, "Successive cyclic movement and island repair: The difference between sluicing and VP-ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, 34, pp.143~154 (2003)
  15. Hardt,Daniel, "Re-binding and the derivation of parallelism domains", In Proceedings of BLS, 32 (2006)
  16. Heim,Irene, "Predicates or Formulas? Evidence from Ellipsis in Proceedings of SALT VII", pp.187~221 (1997), CLC Publications, Cornell University
  17. Jayaseelan,K.A, "Incomplete VP Deletion and Gapping", Linguistic Analysis, 20, pp.64~81 (1990)
  18. Johnson,Kyle, "What VP Ellipsis Can Do, and What It Can't, but Not Why, in The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory", pp.439~479 (2001), Blackwell Publishers
  19. Manzini,M.Ritta, "Locality, Minimalism, and Parasitic Gaps", Linguistic Inquiry, 25, pp.481~508 (1994)
  20. Merchant,Jason, "The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and identity in ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press
  21. Merchant, Jason, "Variable island repair under ellipsis in Topics in ellipsis", pp.132~153 (2008), Cambridge University Press
  22. Park, Bum-Sik, "Locality and Identity in Ellipsis", 박사, pp.2005
  23. 박범식, "Appositive Antecedent Contained Deletion and Parallelism", 생성문법연구, 15(2), pp.165~194 (2005), 한국생성문법학회
  24. Park, Bum-Sik, "How restrictive is Parallelism?", Dongguk University, ~
  25. 박명관, "Nonlocality and Intervening Focus in Sloppy Identity Interpretation", 생성문법연구, 20(3), pp.499~520 (2010), 한국생성문법학회
  26. Parker, Daniel, "MaxElide and it's Domain of Application", Paper presented at LAS Meeting (2010)
  27. Reinhart,Tanya, "Quantification Scope: how labor is divided between QR and choice functions", Linguistic and Philosophy, 20, pp.335~397 (1997)
  28. Rooth,Mats, "Association with Focus", 박사, pp.1985
  29. Rooth,Mats, "Theory of Focus Interpretation", Natural Language Semantics, 1, pp.75~116 (1992)
  30. Ross,John Robert, "Guess who?", In Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (1969)
  31. Sag,Ivan, "Deletion and logical form", 박사, pp.1976
  32. Williams,Edwin, "Discourse and logical form", Linguistic Inquiry, 8, pp.101~139 (1977)
  33. Takahashi,Daiko, "Minimality of movement", 박사, pp.1994
  34. Takahashi, Shoichi, "MaxElide and the re-binding problem", In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, pp.223~240 (2005), CLC Publication

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)