Control Shift, the Minimal Distance Principle, and the Binarity Principle
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The movement theory of control (MTC) predicts that the closest argument is the controller: that is, the MTC cannot be maintained unless the Minimal Distance Principle (MDP) is correct. Accordingly, one of the most important issues in control is whether the MDP is empirically supported. Control shift is a well-known phenomenon that appears to run counter to the MDP. This paper provides supporting evidence in favor of the MDP, showing that control shift follows from the independently motivated principles--the Binarity Principle and the Principle of Co-arguments.
Abstract
The movement theory of control (MTC) predicts that the closest argument is the controller: that is, the MTC cannot be maintained unless the Minimal Distance Principle (MDP) is correct. Accordingly, one of the most important issues in control is whether the MDP is empirically supported. Control shift is a well-known phenomenon that appears to run counter to the MDP. This paper provides supporting evidence in favor of the MDP, showing that control shift follows from the independently motivated principles--the Binarity Principle and the Principle of Co-arguments.
참고문헌 (15)
- Boeckx, C. N. Hornstein, "Control as movement" (2010), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Boeckx, C., "Reply to Control is not Movement", Linguistic Inquiry, 34, pp.269~280 (2003)
- Chomsky, N., "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Minimalist inquiries: the Framework. Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Culicover, P., "The semantic basis of Control in English", Language, 79, pp.517~556 (2003)
- Culicover, P., "Control is not movement", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.493~512 (2001)
- Hornstein, N., "Movement and control", Linguistic Inquiry, 5, pp.481~506 (1999)
- Hornstein, N., "Move! A Minimalist theory of construal" (2001), Blackwell
- Kayne, R. S., "Connectedness and binary branching" (1984), Foris
- 김광섭, "On the Differences between the Double Object Construction and the Dative Construction", 언어연구, 28(3), pp.421~447 (2012), 한국현대언어학회
- Landau, I., "Movement out of control", Linguistic Inquiry, 34, pp.471~498 (2003)
- Landau, I., "The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control", Natural language and linguistic theory, 22, pp.811~877 (2004)
- Larson, R. K., "On the double object construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(3), pp.339~391 (1988)
- Pesetsky, D., "Zero syntax: experiencers and cascase" (1995), MIT Press
- Rosenbaum, P., "The grammar of English predicate complement constructions" (1967), MIT Press