본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

셰익스피어의 『리어왕』(King Lear)에 나타난 남성적 여성들

Shakespeare’s masculine female figures in King Lear

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The present paper aims at studying the gender and role reversal patterns of women from the Shakespeare’s plays feminist and liberal humanist perspectives. This study assumes feminism as an offshoot of the liberal humanism, which posits a subject desiring to be autonomous, to be not only just free, but also to be the origin and guarantee of its own identity, the source of its own being, meaning and agency. One might say that liberals are in general committed to an ontology of the individual- a metaphysical conception of the individual as an irreducible entity endowed with an existence that can be taken to transcend the limitations of any particular culture or society. King Lear is very much a political play, concerned with power and government in the royal family. In the patriarchal society which defines power and politics as “masculine” privileges, Goneril and Regan strive to hold regal power committing “masculine” crimes. In the process they strengthen and maintain the patriarchal systems of men. These threatening women are characterized as monsters and devils by their contemporary misogynist discourses, and subsequently they are outcast. However, in the process of their destruction, they put into question the validity and legitimacy of the patriarchal system. Shakespeare dramatizes complex women as individuals of love, sexual desire, political ambition, and life-care. Goneril, Regan, try their best to achieve self-fulfillment and their agency as human beings in spite of the limits of their patriarchal system. They deny their socially and culturally given roles of docile lover, dependant daughter, and servile wife. They show the developing processes of their true self-fashioning even though they are contained in the patriarchal system in fine.

Abstract

The present paper aims at studying the gender and role reversal patterns of women from the Shakespeare’s plays feminist and liberal humanist perspectives. This study assumes feminism as an offshoot of the liberal humanism, which posits a subject desiring to be autonomous, to be not only just free, but also to be the origin and guarantee of its own identity, the source of its own being, meaning and agency. One might say that liberals are in general committed to an ontology of the individual- a metaphysical conception of the individual as an irreducible entity endowed with an existence that can be taken to transcend the limitations of any particular culture or society. King Lear is very much a political play, concerned with power and government in the royal family. In the patriarchal society which defines power and politics as “masculine” privileges, Goneril and Regan strive to hold regal power committing “masculine” crimes. In the process they strengthen and maintain the patriarchal systems of men. These threatening women are characterized as monsters and devils by their contemporary misogynist discourses, and subsequently they are outcast. However, in the process of their destruction, they put into question the validity and legitimacy of the patriarchal system. Shakespeare dramatizes complex women as individuals of love, sexual desire, political ambition, and life-care. Goneril, Regan, try their best to achieve self-fulfillment and their agency as human beings in spite of the limits of their patriarchal system. They deny their socially and culturally given roles of docile lover, dependant daughter, and servile wife. They show the developing processes of their true self-fashioning even though they are contained in the patriarchal system in fine.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Adelman. Janet, "Suffocation Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays: Hamlet to The Tempest" (1992), Routledge
  2. Blaha, Susan S, "“You Should Be Women”, Constructions of Female Sexuality in Shakespeare’s Tragedies", pp.1995
  3. Brown, Elizabeth Gilliam, "Origins of the Puritan Concept of Despair", pp.2010
  4. Booth, Stephen, "Shakespeare’s Sonnets" (1977), Yale UP
  5. Cavell, Stanley, "Disowning Knowledge in Six Plays of Shakespeare" (1987), Cambridge UP
  6. Cohen, Derek, "Shakespeare’s Culture of Violence" (1993), Macmillan
  7. Eagleton, Terry, "William Shakespeare" (1986), Blackwell
  8. Fergusson, Margaret, "Rewriting the Renaissance: The Discourses of Sexual Difference in Early Modern Europe" (1986), U of Chicago
  9. Fernie, Ewan, "Shame in Shakespeare" (2002), Routledge
  10. French, Marilyn, "Shakespeare’s Division of Experience" (1975), Abacus
  11. Frye, Northrop, "Northrop Frye on Shakespeare" (1986), Yale UP
  12. Gates, Daniel, "‘The Body of This Death’: Despair and Kingship in the English Renaissance", pp.2003
  13. Heinemann, Margot, "Demystifying the Mystery of State: King Lear and the World Upside Down", Shakespeare Survey, 44, pp.14~75 (1992)
  14. Kahn, Coppelia, "Excavationg“Those Dim Minoan Region”: Maternal Subtext in Patriarchal Literature", Diacritics, 12(Summer), pp.32~41 (1982)
  15. Levin, Richard, "Feminist Thematics and Shakespearean Tragedy", PMLA, 103, pp.125~138 (1988)
  16. McFarland, Thomas, "On King Lear" (1981), Princeton UP
  17. McKewin, Carole, "Shakespeare Liberata: Shakespeare, the Nature of Women, and the New Feminist Criticism", Mosaic, 10, pp.157~164 (1977)
  18. McLuskie, Kathleen, "Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Culture Materialism", pp.88~108 (1985), Manchester UP
  19. Muir, Kenneth, "King Lear" (1975), Routledge
  20. Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory, "Sexual", pp.1985, Moi, Toril
  21. Neely, Carol Thomas, "Construction the Subject: Feminist Practice and the New Renaissance Discourse", ELR, 18, pp.5~18 (1981)
  22. Rubin, Gayle, "Toward an Anthropology of Women" (1975), Monthly Review P
  23. Shakespeare, William, "The Riverside Shakespeare" (1974), Houghton Mifflin
  24. Tennenhouse, Leonard, "Power on Display: The Politics of Shakespeare’s Genres" (1986), Methuen
  25. Woodbridge, Linda, "Women and the English Renaissance: Literature and the Nature of Womankind, 1540-1620" (1984), U. of Illinois P
  26. Tong, Rosenmaire, "Feminist Thought : A Comprehensive Introduction" (1989), Westview
  27. Zak, Gur, "Petrarch’s Humanism and Care of the Self" (2010), Cambridge. UP
  28. 박우수, "셰익스피어와 바다" (2016), Huebooks : 한국외국어대학교 지식출판원

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)