On the Long-distance Scrambling/Phonological Suppression of Adjuncts in Korean
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines the syntactic aspects of adjuncts in Korean, particularly when they undergo long-distance scrambling or phonological suppression. It is noted that, unlike argument elements, though apparently distantly scrambled, they cannot be reconstructed into downward embedded clauses. It is also noted that not all adjuncts but non-nominal manner or reason adverbials are disallowed from being phonologically suppressed in the structural environments where arguments in general are allowed to be phonologically null. However, the otherwise illegal reconstruction or recovery of distantly-displaced or phonologically silent adjuncts is made successful as part of the corresponding process for argumental elements that they adjoin to. In essence, we attribute the argument vs. adjunct distinction to the labeling processing that arguments and adjuncts enter into in different ways.
Abstract
This paper examines the syntactic aspects of adjuncts in Korean, particularly when they undergo long-distance scrambling or phonological suppression. It is noted that, unlike argument elements, though apparently distantly scrambled, they cannot be reconstructed into downward embedded clauses. It is also noted that not all adjuncts but non-nominal manner or reason adverbials are disallowed from being phonologically suppressed in the structural environments where arguments in general are allowed to be phonologically null. However, the otherwise illegal reconstruction or recovery of distantly-displaced or phonologically silent adjuncts is made successful as part of the corresponding process for argumental elements that they adjoin to. In essence, we attribute the argument vs. adjunct distinction to the labeling processing that arguments and adjuncts enter into in different ways.
참고문헌 (27)
- Abney, Steven, "The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect", Doctor, pp.1987
- Aoun, Joseph, "Generalized binding" (1986), Foris
- Bošković, Željko, "Be careful where you float your quantifiers", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22, pp.681~742 (2004)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Barriers" (1986), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Foundational issues in linguistic theory", pp.133~166 (2008), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Problems of projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
- Chametzky, Robert A., "A theory of phrase markers and the extended base" (1996), State University of New York Press
- Chametzky, Robert A, "Phrase structure: From GB to Minimalism" (2000), Blackwell
- Cinque, Guglielmo, "Types of A’-dependencies" (1990), MIT Press
- Corver, Norbert, "The syntax of left branch extractions", Doctor, pp.1990
- Cresti, Diana, "Extraction and reconstruction", Natural Language Semantics, 3, pp.79~122 (1995)
- Epstein, Samueld, "Ways of Structure Building" (2012), Cambridge University Press
- Frampton, John, "Review of Relativized Minimality", The Linguistic Review, 8, pp.1~46 (1991)
- Hornstein, Norbert, "Adjunction, labeling, and bare phrase structure", Biolinguistics, 2, pp.57~86 (2008)
- Hornstein, Nobert, "A theory of syntax; Minimal operations and Universal Grammar" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- Huang, C. T. James, "Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar", Doctor, pp.1982
- Kuroda, S. -Y, "Whether we agree or not: A comparative syntax of English and Japanese", Linguisticae Investigationes, 12, pp.1~47 (1988)
- May, Robert, "Logical Form: Its structure and derivation" (1985), MIT
- McCloskey, James, "Adjunction, selection, and embedded verb second" (1992), Linguistics Research Center
- Murasugi, Keiko, "Quasi-adjuncts as sentential arguments", Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics, 5, pp.251~264 (1992), California State University
- Oseki, Yohei, "Eliminating pair-merge", Proceedings of WCCFL, 32 (2014)
- Park, Myung-Kwan, "A morpho-syntactic study of Korean verbal inflection.", Ph.D, pp.1994
- Rizzi, Luigi, "Relativized minimality" (1990), MIT Press
- Rullmann, Hotze, "Scope ambiguities in How many-questions", Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts, ~ (1993)
- Saito, Mamoru, "Case for labeling: Labeling in languages without phi-feature agreement", The Linguistic Review, 33, pp.129~175 (2016)
- Szabolcsi, Anna, "Semantic properties of composed functions and the distribution of wh-phrases", Proceedings of the Seventh Amsterdam Colloquium, pp.529~555 (1990), Institute for Language, Logic and Information
- Szabolcsi, Anna, "Weak islands and an algebraic semantics of scope taking", Natural Language Semantics, 1, pp.235~284 (1993)