『로미오와 줄리엣』: 메를로-퐁티의 『지각의 현상학』을 통한 다시 읽기
Reconsideration of Romeo and Juliet through Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to go away from the argument that this play is either a play of fate or a play of character. Rather I think that the elucidation of the life and death of Romeo and Juliet in this play can be more clearly explored in view of Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception, for Romeo and Juliet experience not unavoidability of fate but concrete acts of love through intersubjectivity. In view of Merleau-Ponty, Romeo’s love for Rosaline is not authentic, real acts of love but mere thoughts about love. On the contrary, Romeo’s love toward Juliet is true and real in presence of the acts of love because his body-subject is mutually intertwined with her body-subject. Merleau-Ponty contends that love is not a thing capable of possession, but it is to establish his relations with the world; it is an existential signification. While the worlds of Montague and Capulet are relatively closed worlds dominated by hatred and violence, Romeo’s and Juliet’s acts of love go toward the open world in which they transit from what they are to what they intend to be. The signification of their love and death through intersubjectivity is manifested through dialectic process in the field of phenomenology.
Abstract
This paper aims to go away from the argument that this play is either a play of fate or a play of character. Rather I think that the elucidation of the life and death of Romeo and Juliet in this play can be more clearly explored in view of Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception, for Romeo and Juliet experience not unavoidability of fate but concrete acts of love through intersubjectivity. In view of Merleau-Ponty, Romeo’s love for Rosaline is not authentic, real acts of love but mere thoughts about love. On the contrary, Romeo’s love toward Juliet is true and real in presence of the acts of love because his body-subject is mutually intertwined with her body-subject. Merleau-Ponty contends that love is not a thing capable of possession, but it is to establish his relations with the world; it is an existential signification. While the worlds of Montague and Capulet are relatively closed worlds dominated by hatred and violence, Romeo’s and Juliet’s acts of love go toward the open world in which they transit from what they are to what they intend to be. The signification of their love and death through intersubjectivity is manifested through dialectic process in the field of phenomenology.
참고문헌 (11)
- 랭어, 모니카, "지각의 현상학" (1992), 청하
- 메를로-퐁티, 모리스, "보이는 것과 보이지 않는 것" (2004), 동문선
- Bullough, Geoffrey, "Narrative and Dramatic Sources of Shakespeare: Early Comedies, Poems, Romeo and Juliet. vol. 1" (1961), Routledge and Kegan Paul
- Dollimore, Jonathan, "Political Shakespeare" (1985), Manchester UP
- Gibbons, Brian, "The Arden Shakespeare: Romeo and Juliet" (1988), Routledge
- Heidegger, Martin, "Being and Time" (1973), Blackwell
- Hillman, Richard, "Shakespearean Subversions" (1992), Routledge
- Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, "Phenomenology of Perception" (1994), Routledge
- Sartre, Jean-Paul, "Being and Nothingness" (1984), Washington Square P
- Smith, Peter J, "Social Shakespeare" (1995), Macmillan P
- Stone, Lawrence, "The Family, Sex and Marriage : In England 1500-1800" (1979), Harper Torchbooks
