Scope Economy in Right Node Raising
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper attempts to provide an account for the Scope Economy effect in Right Node Raising (RNR) in English. In general, the pivot in RNR can take scope above both subjects in TP-coordination. However, it is not allowed when the subject in one TP-conjunct is not a scope-taking element, exhibiting the Scope Economy effect in the sense of Fox (2000). Assuming Scope Economy, I suggest that this effect can be best captured by the multidominance analysis: Being multidominated/shared between both conjuncts, QR of the pivot is permitted only if it induces a semantic effect for both conjuncts. This effect, however, constitutes a non-trivial problem for the rightward ATB movement analysis (cf. Sabbagh 2007) since being overt and unbound, the rightward movement would be blind to Scope Economy. As a consequence, RNR is taken as another context where Scope Economy can be detected, due to the fact that the pivot is shared.
Abstract
This paper attempts to provide an account for the Scope Economy effect in Right Node Raising (RNR) in English. In general, the pivot in RNR can take scope above both subjects in TP-coordination. However, it is not allowed when the subject in one TP-conjunct is not a scope-taking element, exhibiting the Scope Economy effect in the sense of Fox (2000). Assuming Scope Economy, I suggest that this effect can be best captured by the multidominance analysis: Being multidominated/shared between both conjuncts, QR of the pivot is permitted only if it induces a semantic effect for both conjuncts. This effect, however, constitutes a non-trivial problem for the rightward ATB movement analysis (cf. Sabbagh 2007) since being overt and unbound, the rightward movement would be blind to Scope Economy. As a consequence, RNR is taken as another context where Scope Economy can be detected, due to the fact that the pivot is shared.
참고문헌 (51)
- Abbott, Barbara, "Right Node Raising as a Test for Constituenthood", Linguistic Inquiry, 7, pp.639~642 (1976)[DOI]
- Abels, Klaus, "Proceedings of NELS 34", pp.45~60 (2004)
- Bachrach, Asaf, "Inter-Phases: Phase-Theoretic Investigations of Linguistic Interfaces", pp.283~316 (2009), Oxford University Press
- Barros, Mathew, "Right Node Raising Requires Both Multidominance and Ellipsis", Handout of a presentation at the Penn Linguistics Colloquium, 34 (2010)
- Blevins, James P, "Syntactic Complexity: Evidence for Discontinuity and Multidomination", PhD, pp.1990
- Bresnan, Joan W, "The Position of Certain Clause-Particles in Phrase Structure", Linguistic Inquiry, 5, pp.614~619 (1974)
- Bošović, Željko, "Two Notes on Right Node Raising", University of Connecticut Working Papers, pp.13~24 (1996)
- Bošković, Željko, "Across-the-board movement and LF", Syntax, 3(2), pp.107~128 (2000)
- Chaves, Rui P, "On the disunity of Right-Node Raising phenomena:extraposition, ellipsis, and deletion", Language, 90(4), pp.834~886 (2014)
- Cecchetto, Carlo, "Explaining the locality conditions of QR: Consequences for the theory of phases", Natural Language Semantics, 12, pp.345~397 (2004)
- Cecchetto, Carlo, "Linguistic Variation Yearbook N. 5", pp.73~103 (2005), John Benjamin, Co
- Citko, Barbara, "The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism", pp.119~142 (2011), Oxford University Press
- Citko, Barbara, "Symmetry in Syntax: Merge, Move and Labels" (2011), Cambridge University Press
- Féry, Caroline, "The Focus and Prosodic Structure of German Right Node Raising and Gapping", Linguistic Review, 22, pp.69~116 (2005)
- Fox, Danny, "Economy and Semantic Interpretation" (2000), MIT Press
- Fox, Danny, "Antecedent-contained deletion and the copy theory of movement", Linguistic Inquiry, 33, pp.63~96 (2002)
- Fox, Danny, "Cyclic Linearization of Shared Material", Paper presented at Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Typologie und Universalienforschung (ZAS) (2007)
- Goodall, Grant, "Parallel Structures in Syntax: Coordination, Causatives, and Restructuring" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Gračanin-Yuksek, Martina, "About Sharing", PhD, pp.2007
- Ha, Seungwan, "Multiple Dominance CAN’T, but Ellipsis CAN Account for Right Node Raising", Chicago Linguistic Society, 42, pp.17~31 (2006)
- Ha, Seungwan, "Ellipsis, Right Node Raising and Across the Board Constructions", PhD, pp.2008
- Hankamer, Jorge, "Constraints on Deletion in Syntax", PhD, pp.1971
- Hartmann, Katharina, "Right Node Raising and Gapping: Interface Conditions on Prosodic Deletion" (2000), John Benjamins
- Hirsch, Aron, "Proceedings of the 20th Amsterdam Colloquium", pp.187~196 (2015), ILLC
- Hornstein, Norbert, "Logical Form: From GB to Minimalism" (1995), Basil Blackwell
- Johnson, Kyle, "LCA+Alignment=RNR", Paper presented at Workshop on Coordination, Subordination and Ellipsis, University of Tübingen (2007)
- Kayne, Richard S, "The Antisymmetry of Syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- Larson, Bradley, "A Dilemma with Accounts of Right Node Raising", Linguistic Inquiry, 43, pp.143~150 (2012)
- Larson, Richard K, "Antecedent containment or vacuous movement: Reply to Baltin", Linguistic Inquiry, 21, pp.103~122 (1990)
- Lebeaux, David, "Where does the Binding Theory apply", Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, pp.63~88 (1995)
- Maling, Joan M, "On ‘Gapping and the Order of Constituents’", Linguistic Inquiry, 3, pp.101~108 (1972)
- May, Robert, "Logical Form: Its structure and derivation" (1985), MIT Press
- McCawley, James D, "Parentheticals and Discontinous Constituents", Linguistic Inquiry, 13, pp.91~106 (1982)[DOI]
- Merchant, Jason, "Topics in ellipsis", pp.132~153 (2008), Cambridge University Press
- Muadz, Husni, "Coordinate Structures: A Planar Representation", PhD, pp.1991
- Postal, Paul Martin, "On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications" (1974), MIT Press
- Postal, Paul Martin, "Three Investigations of Extraction" (1998), MIT Press
- Postal, Paul Martin, "Skeptical Linguistic Essays" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Reinhart, Tanya, "Wh-in-situ in the framework of the Minimalist Program", Natural Language Semantics, 6, pp.29~56 (1997)
- Ross, John Robert, "Constraints on Variables in Syntax" (1967), MIT
- Sabbagh, Joseph, "Ordering and Linearizing Rightward Movement", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, pp.349~401 (2007)[DOI]
- Sauerland, Uli, "Two structures for English restrictive relative clauses", Proceedings of the Nanzan GLOW, pp.351~366 (2000)
- Tiedeman, Robyne, "Minimalism and linguistic theory, Hituzi Linguistics Workshop Series 4", pp.67~103 (1995), Hituzi Syobo
- Determining the scope of English quantifiers, "VanLehn, Kurt", MIT, ~, pp.Technical report AI-TR-483 (1978)
- Vos, Mark de, "Coordination under Right Node Raising", Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp.97~104 (2005)
- Vries, Mark de, "Merge: Properties and Boundary Conditions", Linguistics in the Netherlands, 22, pp.219~230 (2005)
- Vries, Mark de, "On Multidominance and Linearization", Biolinguistics, 3, pp.344~403 (2009)[DOI]
- Vries, Mark de, "Multidominance and locality", Lingua, 134, pp.149~169 (2013)
- Wilder, Chris, "NELS 27: Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society", pp.425~439 (1997), University of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistic Student Association
- Wilder, Chris, "Proceedings on the Eighteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics", pp.586~598 (1999)
- Wilder, Chris, "Topics in Ellipsis", pp.229~258 (2008), Cambridge University Press