Do-Support and Verb Raising in Emphatic Sentences
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Chomsky (1957) proposes the do-support rule to rescue the stranded affix, which is not attached to its adjacent verb. Do-support takes place in different constructions, whenever the affix is stranded. However, there are some cases where do-support takes place even with the affix being adjacent to the verb. With an [+emphatic] feature, T does not behave like a normal T and affix hopping is blocked even though it is adjacent to the verb; instead, do-support takes place. On the other hand, auxiliary verbs are typically raised to T, but main verbs are not. However, there are also cases where verb movement does not take place. When auxiliary verbs are stressed for emphasis or at the end of a sentence, they are not raised. Instead of V-to-T movement, affix hopping also occurs with the case of auxiliary verbs, as in the case of main verbs. I suggest that the stress factor affects do-support, verb movement and affix hopping.
Abstract
Chomsky (1957) proposes the do-support rule to rescue the stranded affix, which is not attached to its adjacent verb. Do-support takes place in different constructions, whenever the affix is stranded. However, there are some cases where do-support takes place even with the affix being adjacent to the verb. With an [+emphatic] feature, T does not behave like a normal T and affix hopping is blocked even though it is adjacent to the verb; instead, do-support takes place. On the other hand, auxiliary verbs are typically raised to T, but main verbs are not. However, there are also cases where verb movement does not take place. When auxiliary verbs are stressed for emphasis or at the end of a sentence, they are not raised. Instead of V-to-T movement, affix hopping also occurs with the case of auxiliary verbs, as in the case of main verbs. I suggest that the stress factor affects do-support, verb movement and affix hopping.
참고문헌 (35)
- Akmajian, A, "Coreferentiality and Stress", Linguistic Inquiry, 1, pp.124~156 (1970)
- Algeo, J, "The Origins and Development of the English Language (5th edition)" (2005), Thomson Wadsworth
- Baker,C.L, "Stress Level and Auxiliary Behavior in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 2, pp.167~181 (1971)
- Baker,C.L, "Auxiliary-Adverb Word Order", Linguistic Inquiry, 12, pp.309~315 (1981)
- Baker,C.L, "The Syntax of English Not: The Limits of Core Grammar", Linguistic Inquiry, 22, pp.387~429 (1991)
- Beukema, F, "A Government-Binding Perspective on the Imperative in English", Journal of. Linguistics, 25, pp.417~436 (1989)
- Biber, D, "Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written Englis" (1999), Longman
- Bolinger,D, "Meaning and Form" (1977), Longman
- Carnie,A, "Syntax: A Generative Introduction" (2007), Blackwell Publishing
- Celce-Murcia, M, "The Grammar Book" (1999), Heinle and Heinle
- Chomsky,N, "Syntactic Structures" (1957), Mouton Publishers
- Chomsky,N, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Davies,Eirlys, "The English Imperative" (1986), Croom Helm
- Halle, M, "Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection, in The View from Building 20" (1993), MIT Press
- Han Chung-hye, "The Rise of Do-support in English Implications for Clause Structure", Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, 30, pp.311~325 (2000)
- Han,Chung-hye, "The Evolution of Do-support in English Imperatives. in Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms" (2001), Warner
- Hὂfler,Stefan, "The Origins of Old English Morphology", Universitἂt Zὕrich, ~ (2002)
- Kelly, Gerald, "How to Teach Pronunciation" (2000), Longman
- Kim,Young-Sun, "English Auxiliary be and Be in Ellipsis, in Ellipsis in Minimalism", ~ (2005)
- 김영선, "Deletion as Cliticization and Stress in English VP-Ellipsis Construction", 생성문법연구, 16(3), pp.535~553 (2006), 한국생성문법학회
- King,H.V, "On Blocking the Rules for Contraction in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 1, pp.134~136 (1970)
- Kreidler, Charles, "Describing Spoken English" (1997), Routledge
- Lakoff.G, "Global Rules", Language, 46, pp.627~639 (1970)
- Lasnik,Howard, "Restricting the Theory of Transformations. in Explanation in Linguistics", Longman, 152~173 (1981)
- Lasnik,Howard, "Verbal Morphology: Syntactic Structures Meets the Minimalist Program, in Minimalist Analysis" (1999), Blackwell
- Lasnik,Howard, "Syntactic Structures Revisited: Contemporary Lectures on Classic Transformational Theory" (2000), MIT Press
- Lightfoot, David, "Minimizing Government: Deletion as Cliticization", Georgetown University, ~ (2004)
- Pollock,Jean-Yves, "Verb Movement, Universal Grammar and the Structure of IP", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.365~424 (1989)
- Potsdam,Eric, "Phrase Structure of the English Imperative", in Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Midamerica, pp.143~154 (1995), Indiana University
- Potsdam,Eric, "Analysing Word Order in the English Imperative,inImperative Clauses in Generative Grammar,ed.by Wim van der Wurff,Amsterdam:John Benjamins 251-272", pp.251~272 (2007), John Benjamins
- Quirk, R, "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
- Radford,Andrew, "Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Ross,J.R, "Auxiliaries as Main Verbs, in Studies in Philosophical Linguistics" (1969), Great Expectations Press
- Swan,Michael, "Practical English Usage", Oxford, ~ (1996)
- Wells,J.C, "English Intonation", Cambridge, ~ (2006)