국어 유동 수-분류사(floating numeral classifier)의 실험언어학적 증거: ERP 기반 연구
A unified standing approach to floating numeral classifiers in Korean: ERP based experimental evidence
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper investigates the sentence processing of 'floating' numeralclassifiers (FNCs) in Korean by using the event-related potentials (ERP)paradigm. In particular, we examine the following three questions. First,is there a difference between Case-marked and Case-less forms of FNCs?Second, is there a contrast between subject-related and object-relatedFNCs? Third, is there a distinction between Case-marked andfocus-particle-marked FNCs? We found from the ERP experiment that,first, subject-related Case-less forms of FNCs elicit N400 followed byP600 in comparison to the corresponding Case-marked ones, butobject-related ones didn't. Second, subject-related FNCs are greater inamplitude than object-related ones. Third, subject-relatedfocus-particle-marked FNCs also elicit N400 followed by P600 incomparison to the corresponding Case-marked ones, but object-relatedones didn't. We take all the three results to renderneuroelectrophysiological evidence that our mind detects subject-objectasymmetry in the case of processing subject-related focus-particle-markedFNCs as well as subject-related Case-less ones. Based on the results fromthe ERP study, allowing subject scrambling we suggest a unified'stranding' approach to 'floating' numeral classifiers in Korean.
Abstract
This paper investigates the sentence processing of 'floating' numeralclassifiers (FNCs) in Korean by using the event-related potentials (ERP)paradigm. In particular, we examine the following three questions. First,is there a difference between Case-marked and Case-less forms of FNCs?Second, is there a contrast between subject-related and object-relatedFNCs? Third, is there a distinction between Case-marked andfocus-particle-marked FNCs? We found from the ERP experiment that,first, subject-related Case-less forms of FNCs elicit N400 followed byP600 in comparison to the corresponding Case-marked ones, butobject-related ones didn't. Second, subject-related FNCs are greater inamplitude than object-related ones. Third, subject-relatedfocus-particle-marked FNCs also elicit N400 followed by P600 incomparison to the corresponding Case-marked ones, but object-relatedones didn't. We take all the three results to renderneuroelectrophysiological evidence that our mind detects subject-objectasymmetry in the case of processing subject-related focus-particle-markedFNCs as well as subject-related Case-less ones. Based on the results fromthe ERP study, allowing subject scrambling we suggest a unified'stranding' approach to 'floating' numeral classifiers in Korean.
참고문헌 (27)
- Ahn, Sung-Ho, "Korean quantification and Universal Grammar", 박사, pp.1990
- Bobaljik, Jonathan David, "Morphosyntax: The syntax of verbal inflection", 박사, pp.1995
- Bobaljik, Jonathan David, "The Second GLOT International State-of-the-Article Book: The Latest in Linguistics", pp.107~148 (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
- Bošković, Željko, "Be careful where you float your quantifiers", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22(4), pp.681~742 (2004)
- Burkhardt, Petra, "The syntax-discourse interface: Representing and interpreting dependency" (2005), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Dimitrova, Diana., "Neural correlates of prosody and information structure", 박사, pp.2012
- Fukushima, Kazuhiko, "Phrase structure grammar, Montague semantics and floating quantifiers in Japanese", Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, pp.581~628 (1991)
- Greenhouse, Samuel W, "On methods in the analysis of profile data", Psychometrika, 24, pp.95~112 (1959)
- Hagoort, Peter, "The syntactic positive shift(SPS)as an ERP measure of syntactic processing", Language Cognitive Processes, 8, pp.439~483 (1993)
- Kaan, Edith, "The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty", Language Cognitive Processes, 15, pp.159~201 (2000)
- Kang, Beom-Mo, "Categories and meanings of Korean floating quantifiers –with some references to Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 11, pp.375~398 (2002)
- Kayne, Richard, "French syntax: The transformational cycle" (1975), MIT Press
- Kim, Jong-Bok, "Floated numeral classifiers in Korean: A non-derivational, functional account", Lingua, 133, pp.189~212 (2013)
- Kim, Jong-Bok, "Processing Korean numeral classifier constructions in a typed feature structure grammar", 석사, pp.2006
- Ko, Heejeong, "Syntactic edges and linearization", 박사, pp.2005
- Ko, Heejeong, "Asymmetries in scrambling and cyclic linearization", Linguistic Inquiry, 38, pp.49~83 (2007)
- Korean Linguistics 19, "Japanese", pp.2011, Ko, Heejeong
- 안희돈, "On the Nature of Zero Realization of Arguments: A Reply to Lee (2011)", 언어연구, 29(1), pp.1~20 (2012), 언어정보연구소
- Krifka, Manfred, "Focus and presupposition in dynamic interpretation", Journal of Semantics, 10, pp.269~300 (1993)
- Kuroda, Shige-Yuki, "What can Japanese say about Government and Binding?", Proceedings of WCCFL, 2, pp.153~164 (1983), Stanford Linguistics Association, Stanford University
- Kutas, Marta, "Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity", Science, 207, pp.203~205 (1980)
- Miyagawa, Shigeru, "Locality in syntax and floating numeral quantifiers", Linguistic Inquiry, 38, pp.645~670 (2007)
- Rooth, Mats, "A theory of focus interpretation", Natural Language Semantics, 1, pp.75~116 (1992)
- Saito, Mamoru, "Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications", 박사, pp.1985
- Sohn, Keun-Won, "Negative polarity items, scope, and economy", 박사, pp.1995
- Sportiche, Dominique, "A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.425~449 (1988)
- van Berkum, Jos J. A., "Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400", Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, pp.657~671 (1999)