정의와 자비의 문제: 『자에는 자로』
Justice and Mercy in Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure deals with a problem presented by the strict enforcement of law and justice. There are confrontations between justice and mercy, and the letter of the law and its spirit in the play. Claudio is to be executed for fornication, and this is to be enforced by Angelo as the interim ruler of the city. Although the legitimacy of the death penalty for fornication is questionable, the problem is not the legitimacy of the law itself but the issues of equity and justice revealed in the enforcement of the law. Angelo is a person who practices justice through rigorous law enforcement, while Duke is a person who is willing to temper strict enforcement with mercy. Angelo’s rigid judgement on crime and punishment is related to that of the Old Testament and of common law; the judgment of the benevolent Duke is based on the New Testament and the judgment of the equity court. This paper discusses justice and mercy, reviewing the contrasting attitudes on crime and punishment reflected in the Bible, and common law as well as equity law in the Renaissance period.
Abstract
Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure deals with a problem presented by the strict enforcement of law and justice. There are confrontations between justice and mercy, and the letter of the law and its spirit in the play. Claudio is to be executed for fornication, and this is to be enforced by Angelo as the interim ruler of the city. Although the legitimacy of the death penalty for fornication is questionable, the problem is not the legitimacy of the law itself but the issues of equity and justice revealed in the enforcement of the law. Angelo is a person who practices justice through rigorous law enforcement, while Duke is a person who is willing to temper strict enforcement with mercy. Angelo’s rigid judgement on crime and punishment is related to that of the Old Testament and of common law; the judgment of the benevolent Duke is based on the New Testament and the judgment of the equity court. This paper discusses justice and mercy, reviewing the contrasting attitudes on crime and punishment reflected in the Bible, and common law as well as equity law in the Renaissance period.
참고문헌 (20)
- 김종환, "감시와 처벌: 『자에는 자로』에 나타난 권력의 속성", Shakespeare Review, 51(3), pp.431~451 (2015), 한국셰익스피어학회
- 권오숙, "셰익스피어의 법률 희곡 『베니스의 상인』과 『자에는 자로』를 통한 셰익스피어의 법률관 연구", Shakespeare Review, 51(3), pp.405~430 (2015), 한국셰익스피어학회
- 김연식, "15세기에서 19세기 사이의 영국 보통법 법원과 형평법 법원의 관계와 한미-FTA상의 투자자-국가 분쟁해결 체계", 영국연구, (31), pp.27~68 (2014), 영국사학회
- "성경전서" (2001), 대한성서공회
- 안경환, "법, 셰익스피어를 입다" (2012), 서울대학교출판문화원
- 요시노, 켄지, "셰익스피어, 정의를 말하다" (2012), 지식의 날개
- Adelman, Janet, "Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origins in Shakespeare’s Plays" (1992), Routledge
- Bate, Jonathan, "Shakespeare and the Law", pp.41~50 (2008), Hart Publishing
- Bennet, J. W., "Measure for Measure as Royal Entertainment" (1966), Columbia UP
- Bradbrook, Muriel C., "Authority, Truth, and Justice in Measure for Measure", The Review of English Studies, 17(68), pp.385~399 (1941)
- Bradshaw, Graham, "Shakespeare’s Scepticism" (1987), Harvester P
- Dollimore, Jonathan, "Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism", pp.72~87 (1985), Manchester UP
- Goldberg, Jonathan, "James I and the Politics of Literature" (1989), Stanford UP
- Kornstein, Daniel J, "Kill All the Lawyers?: Shakespeare’s Legal Appeal. 1994" (2005), U of Nebraska P
- Lever, J. W., "Measure for Measure" (1980), Methuen
- Pope, Elizabeth M, "The Renaissance Background of Measure for Measure", Shakespeare Survey, 2, pp.66~82 (1949)
- Posner, Richard A., "Law and Literature" (2009), Harvard UP
- Rackley, Erika, "Shakespeare and the Law", pp.65~79 (2008), Hart Publishing
- Shakespeare, William, "Riverside Shakespeare" (1974), Houghton Mifflin
- Sundelson, David, "Misogyny and Rule in Measure for Measure", Women’s Studies, 9, pp.83~91 (1981)