In Defense of Comparisons between Formal and Informal Acceptability Judgments
5
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This squib addresses the theoretical and empirical premise of comparisons between informal and formal acceptability judgments in defense of necessities and implications of our own work on experimental syntax. Since the early days of experimental syntax, some linguists have expressed concerns about comparing the results of informal and formal methods. Contrary to this stance, we have found ample evidence that comparing these two types of judgments is not only justified but also a fruitful method for delving into syntactic constraints.
Abstract
This squib addresses the theoretical and empirical premise of comparisons between informal and formal acceptability judgments in defense of necessities and implications of our own work on experimental syntax. Since the early days of experimental syntax, some linguists have expressed concerns about comparing the results of informal and formal methods. Contrary to this stance, we have found ample evidence that comparing these two types of judgments is not only justified but also a fruitful method for delving into syntactic constraints.
참고문헌 (25)
- Culbertson, Jennifer, "Are Linguists Better Subjects?", The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60(4), pp.721~736 (2009)
- Devitt, Michael, "Intuitions in Linguistics", The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57(3), pp.481~513 (2006)
- Devitt, Michael, "Linguistic Intuitions Revisited", The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61(4), pp.833~865 (2010)
- Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka, "A Streamlined Approach to Online Linguistic Surveys", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 34(2), pp.481~495 (2016)
- Fanselow, Gisbert, "Gradience in Grammar:Generative Perspectives", pp.1~23 (2006), Oxford University Press
- Freidin, Robert, "Foundations of Generative Syntax" (1992), The MIT Press
- Greenbaum, Sidney, "Contextual Influence on Acceptability Judgements", Linguistics, 15(187), pp.5~12 (1977)
- Gross, Steven, "Revisited Linguistic Intuitions", The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62(3), pp.639~656 (2011)
- Labov, William, "What Is a Linguistic Fact?" (1975), Peter De Ridder Press
- Lakoff, Robin, "Acceptability in Language", pp.73~86 (1977), Mouton Publishers
- Linzen, Tal, "The Reliability of Acceptability Judgments across Languages" (2015)
- Martin, Roger, "Null Case and the Distribution of PRO", Linguistic Inquiry, 32(1), pp.141~166 (2001)
- Myers, James, "Syntactic Judgment Experiments", Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), pp.406~423 (2009)
- Myers, James, "The Design and Analysis of Small-scale Syntactic Judgment Experiments", Lingua, 119(3), pp.425~444 (2009)
- Myers, James, "Markedness and Lexical Typicality in Mandarin Acceptability Judgments", Language and Linguistics, 16(6), pp.791~818 (2015)
- Korean Linguistics, Vol. 17, "Japanese", pp.2009, Phillips, Colin
- 송상헌, "FAQ: Do Non-linguists Share the Same Intuition as Linguists?", 어학연구, 50(2), pp.357~386 (2014), 언어교육원
- Sorace, Antonella, "Gradience in Linguistic Data", Lingua, 115(11), pp.1497~1524 (2005)
- Spencer, Nancy J, "Differences between Linguists and Nonlinguists in Intuitions of Grammaticality-Acceptability", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2(2), pp.83~98 (1973)
- Sprouse, Jon, "Assessing the Reliability of Textbook Data in Syntax: Adger’s Core Syntax", Journal of Linguistics, 48(3), pp.609~652 (2012)
- Sprouse, Jon, "A Comparison of Informal and Formal Acceptability Judgments Using a Random Sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010", Lingua, 134, pp.219~248 (2013)
- Sprouse, Jon, "Continuous Acceptability, Categorical Grammaticality, and Experimental Syntax", Biolinguistics, 1, pp.123~134 (2007)
- Valian, Virginia, "Language, Mind, and Brain", pp.179~188 (1982), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Wasow, Thomas, "Intuitions in Linguistic Argumentation", Lingua, 115(11), pp.1481~1496 (2005)
- Weskott, Thomas, "On the Informativity of Different Measures of Linguistic Acceptability", Language, 87(2), pp.249~273 (2011)