본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Navigating a Wheel of Nature: Shakespeare’s Reflections on Nature in King Lear

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This article investigates William Shakespeare’s figuration of the two versions of nature in King Lear—nature as an ordered cosmos and nature as autonomous, each of which loosely represents the old, medieval world’s and the emerging Enlightenment world’s views of nature. Its primary purpose is to offer a systematic understanding of the play’s complex and often ambiguous engagement with nature, as well as its depiction of the ideological hybridity of Shakespeare’s time, through meticulous character analysis, while adding one possible approach to the established discourses on the dramatist’s views of nature. Specifically, the article studies nature’s curious and often troubled correspondence with human “nature” by focusing on the reception of nature by three major characters—Lear, Edmund, and Edgar—and their shifting aspects of identity and personal transformation resulting from it. The article demonstrates how Lear and Edmund, as proxies of the old and new worlds facing harsh ideological strife, respond to the two versions of nature, thereby defining themselves as individuals. Then, it illuminates Edgar as a conciliatory character who, albeit challenged, adroitly negotiates the parameters of the other two’s views of nature, arguing that Edgar’s miraculous survival and final ascension suggest Shakespeare’s implicit emphasis on the exigencies of making a wise compromise between the two trends of nature, as epitomized in Lear’s godson. The article’s scrutiny of the idea of nature in King Lear would reveal a hybrid ideological landscape of Shakespeare’s time, consisting of motifs of stability and change, nostalgia for disenchantment, and the growing urge for disenchantment.

Abstract

This article investigates William Shakespeare’s figuration of the two versions of nature in King Lear—nature as an ordered cosmos and nature as autonomous, each of which loosely represents the old, medieval world’s and the emerging Enlightenment world’s views of nature. Its primary purpose is to offer a systematic understanding of the play’s complex and often ambiguous engagement with nature, as well as its depiction of the ideological hybridity of Shakespeare’s time, through meticulous character analysis, while adding one possible approach to the established discourses on the dramatist’s views of nature. Specifically, the article studies nature’s curious and often troubled correspondence with human “nature” by focusing on the reception of nature by three major characters—Lear, Edmund, and Edgar—and their shifting aspects of identity and personal transformation resulting from it. The article demonstrates how Lear and Edmund, as proxies of the old and new worlds facing harsh ideological strife, respond to the two versions of nature, thereby defining themselves as individuals. Then, it illuminates Edgar as a conciliatory character who, albeit challenged, adroitly negotiates the parameters of the other two’s views of nature, arguing that Edgar’s miraculous survival and final ascension suggest Shakespeare’s implicit emphasis on the exigencies of making a wise compromise between the two trends of nature, as epitomized in Lear’s godson. The article’s scrutiny of the idea of nature in King Lear would reveal a hybrid ideological landscape of Shakespeare’s time, consisting of motifs of stability and change, nostalgia for disenchantment, and the growing urge for disenchantment.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Aristotle, "Nicomachean Ethics" (2009), Oxford UP
  2. Aristotle, "Physics" (2008), Oxford UP
  3. Armstrong, Philip, "The Oxford Handbook of Shakespearean Tragedy" (2016), Oxford UP
  4. Auden, W. H., "Lectures on Shakespeare" (2000), Princeton UP
  5. Bacon, Francis, "Essays" (1999), Oxford UP
  6. Bloom, Harold, "Shakespeare: The Invention of Human" (1999), Riverhead Books
  7. Bradley, A. C., "Shakespearean Tragedy" (2007), Palgrave Macmillan
  8. Cartwright, Kent, "Shakespearean Tragedy and Its Double: The Rhythms of Audience Response" (1991), U of Pennsylvania P
  9. Cavell, Stanley, "Disowning Knowledge: In Seven Plays of Shakespeare" (2003), Cambridge UP
  10. Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, "Coleridge’s Criticism of Shakespeare" (1989), Wayne State UP
  11. Danby, John F., "Shakespeare’s Doctrine of Nature: A Study of King Lear" (1961), Faber and Faber
  12. Egan, Gabriel, "Shakespeare and Ecocritical Theory" (2015), Bloomsbury
  13. Elton, R. Elton, "King Lear and the Gods" (1988), University P of Kentucky
  14. Fletcher, Angus, "Time, Space, and Motion in the Age of Shakespeare" (2007), Harvard UP
  15. Foakes, R. A., "King Lear", pp.1~151 (1997), The Arden Shakespeare
  16. Gross, Kenneth, "Shakespeare’s Noise" (2001), U of Chicago P
  17. Gruber, Elizabeth D., "Nature on the Verge", Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 22(1), pp.98~114 (2015)
  18. Horkheimer, Max, "Dialectic of Enlightenment" (2002), Standford UP
  19. Johnson, Samuel, "Johnson on Shakespeare" (1986), Yale UP
  20. Knights, Wilson, "The Wheel of Fire" (2001), Routledge
  21. Kozintsev, Grigori, "King Lear: The Space of Tragedy" (1977), U of California P
  22. Lockwood, Thornton C., "Physis and Nomos in Aristotle’s Ethics", The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter, 12, pp.23~35 (2005)
  23. Marcus, Leah S., "The Oxford Handbook of Shakespearean Tragedy" (2016), Oxford UP
  24. Mazzeo, Joseph Anthony, "Metaphysical Poetry and the Poetic of Correspondence", Journal of the History of Ideas, 14(2), pp.221~234 (1953)
  25. Mazzeo, Joseph Anthony, "Renaissance and Revolution" (1967), Pantheon
  26. McElroy, Bernard, "Shakespeare’s Mature Tragedies" (2014), Princeton UP
  27. Nuttall, Anthony David, "Shakespeare the Thinker" (2008), Yale UP
  28. Ovid, "Metamorphoses" (2008), Oxford UP
  29. Palfrey, Simon, "Poor Tom: Living King Lear" (2014), U of Chicago P
  30. Pico della Mirandola, Giovanni, "The Renaissance Philosophy of Man" (1948), U of Chicago P
  31. Pope, Alexander, "The Major Works" (2008), Oxford UP
  32. Shakespeare, William, "King Lear: A Parallel Text Edition" (2013), Routledge
  33. Shannon, Laurie, "Poor, Bare, Forked: Animal Sovereignty, Human Negative Exceptionalism, and the Natural History of ‘King Lear’", Shakespeare Quarterly, 60(2), pp.168~196 (2009)
  34. Strier, Richard, "Shakesperean Issues: Agency, Skepticism, and Other Puzzles" (2024), U of Pennsylvania P
  35. Taylor, Charles, "A Secular Age" (2007), Harvard UP
  36. Tillyard, E. M. W., "The Elizabethan World Picture" (1944), Vintage Books
  37. Wells, Headlam Robin, "Shakespeare’s Humanism" (2009), Cambridge UP

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)