Notes on Extraction from Missing CPs
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is noted that scrambling is impossible from argument ellipsis sites. This supports the claim that argument ellipsis does not have a full-fledged structure and that it involves pro. Pro analyses of missing arguments are in line with Hankamer and Sag’s (1976) main idea on deep anaphora. Deep anaphoras do not have internal structures. Whether anaphora sites involve internal structures has been debated for a long time. Recently, Sakamoto (2017) and Takahashi (2020) suggest that there are cleft examples showing that extraction seems to be possible from argument ellipsis sites. This squib examines whether the cleft examples in Korean involve movement from argument ellipsis sites. We suggest that the clefting examples in Korean pointed out by Sakamoto (2017) don’t involve movement from a hidden clause structure and that an LF copying strategy is not needed to account for the interpretation of the examples. We note that an adjunct reading construed with an embedded predicate is absent in Korean adjunct clefting. We suggest that the absence of such an interpretation indicates that LF copying does not occur in argument ellipsis sites.
Abstract
It is noted that scrambling is impossible from argument ellipsis sites. This supports the claim that argument ellipsis does not have a full-fledged structure and that it involves pro. Pro analyses of missing arguments are in line with Hankamer and Sag’s (1976) main idea on deep anaphora. Deep anaphoras do not have internal structures. Whether anaphora sites involve internal structures has been debated for a long time. Recently, Sakamoto (2017) and Takahashi (2020) suggest that there are cleft examples showing that extraction seems to be possible from argument ellipsis sites. This squib examines whether the cleft examples in Korean involve movement from argument ellipsis sites. We suggest that the clefting examples in Korean pointed out by Sakamoto (2017) don’t involve movement from a hidden clause structure and that an LF copying strategy is not needed to account for the interpretation of the examples. We note that an adjunct reading construed with an embedded predicate is absent in Korean adjunct clefting. We suggest that the absence of such an interpretation indicates that LF copying does not occur in argument ellipsis sites.
참고문헌 (37)
- 안희돈, "On the Absence of CP Ellipsis in English and Korean", 언어, 34(2), pp.267~281 (2009), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 안희돈, "More on the Absence of CP Ellipsis: A Reply to Park (2009)", 생성문법연구, 20(1), pp.137~148 (2010), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 안희돈, "Notes on Apparent DP Ellipsis: A Reply to Lee & Kim (2010)", 언어, 36(2), pp.457~471 (2011), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 안희돈, "On Sloppy-like Interpretation of Null Arguments", 언어연구, 28(3), pp.471~492 (2011), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- Ahn, Hee-Don, "Some ellipsis phenomena in Korean", Proceedings of the 14th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar, pp.3~38 (2012), Hankuk Publishing Co
- 안희돈, "On Null Arguments and Clausal Ellipsis in Korean", 언어와언어학, (57), pp.95~124 (2012), 언어연구소
- 안희돈, "On Apparent Problems of Pro Analysis of Null Argument", 생성문법연구, 23(3), pp.511~526 (2013), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 안희돈, "영논항의 pro(영대명사) 분석 재고", 언어와언어학, (86), pp.85~112 (2019), 언어연구소[DOI]
- 안희돈, "영논항의 대명사 분석에 대한 재고찰", 언어와 정보, 24(1), pp.1~13 (2020), 한국언어정보학회[DOI]
- Grimshaw, Jane, "Complement selection and the lexicon", Linguistic Inquiry, 10, pp.279~326 (1979)
- Hankamer, Jorge, "Deep and surface anaphora", Linguistic Inquiry, 7, pp.391~428 (1976)
- Hiraiwa, Ken, "Syntactic metamorphosis: Clefts, sluicing, and in-situ focus in Japanese", Syntax, 15, pp.142~180 (2012)
- Hoji, Hajime, "Theories of anaphora and aspects of Japanese syntax" (1990), University of Southern California
- Hoji, Hajime, "Null object and sloppy identity in Japanese", Linguistic Inquiry, 29, pp.127~152 (1998)
- Jackendoff, Ray, "The Architecture of the Language Faculty" (1997), MIT Press
- Jhang, Sea-Eun, "Headed nominalizations in Korean: Relative clauses, clefts and comparatives", Doctor, pp.1994
- Kang, Bosook, "Some peculiarities of Korean kes cleft constructions", Studia Linguistica, 60, pp.251~281 (2006)
- 이우승, "Zero Realization of Arguments Revisited", 언어, 36(4), pp.1031~1052 (2011), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 이우승, "Argumental Gaps in Korean", 언어학, 22(1), pp.1~29 (2014), 대한언어학회[DOI]
- 이우승, "Argument ellipsis vs. V-stranding VP ellipsis in Korean: Evidence from disjunction", 언어연구, 33(1), pp.1~20 (2016), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 이우승, "Adjunct Ellipsis in Korean", 생성문법연구, 29(4), pp.669~687 (2019), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 이우승, "DP Ellipsis as Independent Phenomena from pro in pro-drop Languages", 언어, 35(4), pp.1009~1029 (2010), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 문귀선, "영논항의 속성 재조명", 언어학, 18(1), pp.67~92 (2010), 대한언어학회[DOI]
- 문귀선, "A Non-isomorphism Approach to Null-Argument Anaphora in Korean", 생성문법연구, 25(1), pp.217~236 (2015), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 문귀선, "Co-varying Pronominal Anaphors: Focusing on Bound Variable Pronouns", 생성문법연구, 27(1), pp.221~240 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 문귀선, "On the Validity of the Skolemized Choice Function Approach to Small pro Anaphora in Korean", 생성문법연구, 29(2), pp.413~439 (2019), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Park, Myung-Kwan, "A morpho-syntactic study of Korean verbal inflection", Doctor, pp.1994
- 박명관, "Some Remarks on the Licensing Condition on the Null Argument in Korean (and Japanese)", 생성문법연구, 24(2), pp.499~514 (2014), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Pustejovsky, James, "The Generative Lexicon" (1995), MIT Press
- Sakamoto, Yuta, "Escape from silent syntax", Doctor, pp.2017
- Mamoru Saito, "Notes on East Asian Argument Ellipsis", 어학연구, 43(2), pp.203~227 (2007), 언어교육원
- Saito, Mamoru, "Handbook of Japanese Syntax", pp.701~750 (2017), De Gruyter Mouton
- Sohn, Keun-Won, "Operator movement and cleft conditions", the International Workshop on Generative Grammar (2000)
- 손근원, "Apparent CP Deletion and DP Relatedness", 언어연구, 29(1), pp.107~126 (2012), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 손근원, "Deep", Surface Anaphors in Korean and Implications Thereof, 2015, pp.30(4), 905~926[DOI]
- 손근원, "A base generation approach to kulehkey construction leaving remnants", 언어연구, 34(4), pp.661~671 (2019), 한국현대언어학회[DOI]
- Takahashi, Daiko, "Derivational argument ellipsis", The Linguistic Review, 37, pp.47~74 (2020)