본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Teaching activities and students’ preferences in integrated college English reading and writing classes.

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study was designed to explore effective techniques to be used in IERW (Integrated English Reading and Writing) classes for college students. The study last for 15 weeks and included 457 students and 11 instructors at E University. The participants were freshmen who were taking a compulsory English reading and writing class, and the instructors were seven native English speakers and four Koreans. To ensure the effectiveness of IERW classes, it is important to identify what teaching activities are being used and which activities students prefer. To address these issues, the instructors were interviewed regarding their teaching activities in IERW classes. From the interview results, a survey was made that asked students which class activities they consider useful. The results show that most students responded positively to the activities that the instructors were using, with a preference of around 70 percent. Notably, pair or group activities were rated as less favorable than other activities, with a score of under 50 percent. Some implications of the findings and suggestions for teaching activities for IERW classes are provided.

Abstract

This study was designed to explore effective techniques to be used in IERW (Integrated English Reading and Writing) classes for college students. The study last for 15 weeks and included 457 students and 11 instructors at E University. The participants were freshmen who were taking a compulsory English reading and writing class, and the instructors were seven native English speakers and four Koreans. To ensure the effectiveness of IERW classes, it is important to identify what teaching activities are being used and which activities students prefer. To address these issues, the instructors were interviewed regarding their teaching activities in IERW classes. From the interview results, a survey was made that asked students which class activities they consider useful. The results show that most students responded positively to the activities that the instructors were using, with a preference of around 70 percent. Notably, pair or group activities were rated as less favorable than other activities, with a score of under 50 percent. Some implications of the findings and suggestions for teaching activities for IERW classes are provided.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Anderson, R. C., "Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge" (1977), Lawrence Erlbaum
  2. Applebee, A., "Writing and reading", Journal of Reading, 20(6), pp.534~537 (1977)
  3. "Receptive skills" (2019)[URL]
  4. Busbee, E., "Computer training to improve word recognition and reading speed", English Teaching, 56(2), pp.143~165 (2001)
  5. Carson, J., "Reading in the composition classroom", pp.299~314 (1993), Newbury House
  6. EFL writing classes, "Sustained content teaching: Developing academic skills in ESL", pp.2000, Carson, J.
  7. DuBrowa, M., "Integrating reading and writing : One professor’s story", Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 28(1), pp.30~33 (2011)
  8. Feak, C., "Building on the impromptu : Source-based academic writing assessment", College ESL, 6(1), pp.73~84 (1996)
  9. Goen, S., "Integrating reading and writing : A response to the basic writing crisis", Journal of Basic Writing, 22(2), pp.90~113 (2003)
  10. Grabe, W., "Current developments in second language reading research", TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), pp.375~405 (1991)
  11. Grabe, W., "Exploring the dynamics of second language writing", pp.242~262 (2003), Cambridge University Press
  12. Grabe, W., "Theory and practice of writing" (1996), Longman
  13. Harklau, L., "The role of writing in classroom second language acquisition", Journal of Second Language Writing, 11(4), pp.329~350 (2002)
  14. Johanne, M., "Second language writing and research: The writing process and error analysis in student texts", TESL-EJ The Electronic Journal for as a Second Language, 6, pp.1~10 (2002)
  15. 김은정, "Textbook Evaluation for College Reading Classes", 언어과학연구, (49), pp.23~48 (2009), 언어과학회
  16. 김은주, "산업체가 인식하는 대학 교양교육과 핵심역량 교육요구도 분석-보건업을 중심으로", 교양교육연구, 11(2), pp.121~145 (2017), 한국교양교육학회
  17. 김현옥, "대학 교양영어 수준별 프로그램 운영방안", 영어교육연구, 22(4), pp.75~101 (2010), 팬코리아영어교육학회[DOI]
  18. 권민정, "대학생의 영어 문식력 신장을 위한 읽기·쓰기 통합학습 방안", 언어과학연구, (73), pp.1~24 (2015), 언어과학회
  19. Leki, I., "Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives", pp.9~32 (1993), Heinle & Heinle
  20. Milkulecky, B. S., "Reading power" (1986), Addison Wesley
  21. Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development, "2007 revised national curriculum of foreign languages (1)", Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development, ~ (2007)
  22. 박민정, "대학교육의 기능과 역할 변화에 따른 대안적 교육과정 담론", 교육과정연구, 26(4), pp.173~197 (2008), 한국교육과정학회[DOI]
  23. Pysarchyk, O. L., "The importance of integrating reading and writing for EFL teaching", Advanced Education, 3, pp.77~83 (2015)[DOI]
  24. Reid, J., "Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives", pp.33~60 (1993), Heinle and Heinle
  25. Saikey, E. H., "Integrating reading and writing: The DRWA. Reading Horizons", A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 27(4), pp.1~10 (1987)
  26. Scott, D., "Integrating reading and writing lessons", Reading Horizons : A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 28(1), pp.1~10 (1987)
  27. Shanahan, T., "An analysis and comparison of theoretical models of the reading-writing relationship", Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), pp.116~123 (1986)
  28. 신영헌, "대학생의 영어 글쓰기 능력 향상을 위한 교양영어수업 연구", 교양교육연구, 12(4), pp.37~65 (2018), 한국교양교육학회
  29. Spack, R., "Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives", pp.183~196 (1993), Heinle & Heinle
  30. Spack, R., "Initiating students into the academic discourse community: How far should we go?", TESOL Quarterly, 22(1), pp.29~51 (1998)
  31. Squire, R., "Composing and comprehending: Two sides of the same basic process", Language Arts, 60(5), pp.581~587 (1983)
  32. Stotsky, S., "Research on reading", writing relationships : A synthesis and suggested directions, 1983, pp.60(5), 627~642
  33. 탁진영, "쓰기에 대한 의식도 및 쓰기 중심 교양영어 수업의 방법 · 만족도 조사: 영어 원어민 교수와 한국인 영어 비원어민 교수 수업을 중심으로", 영미어문학, (105), pp.323~349 (2012), 한국영미어문학회
  34. Tierney, R., "Handbook of reading research", pp.246~280 (1991), Longman
  35. 윤혜경, "‘핵심역량교육’으로서 교양영어교육의 역할-경남대학교 사례를 중심으로", 교양교육연구, 7(6), pp.429~458 (2013), 한국교양교육학회
  36. Weissberg, B., "Developmental relationships in the acquisition of English syntax : Writing vs. speech", Learning and Instruction, 10(1), pp.37~53 (2000)
  37. Zamel, V., "Writing one’s way into reading", TESOL Quarterly, 26(3), pp.463~485 (1992)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)