본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Organization of Invitation Sequences in Korean High School English Textbook Dialogues

2

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

As a primary source of input for language learning, textbooks provide learners with various language samples. This paper investigates whether Korean English textbooks provide an adequate language model to follow, particularly focusing on how an invitation is tendered and responded to. Dialogues that contain an invitation were pulled from seven high school English textbooks and analyzed from a Conversation Analytic (CA) perspective. According to the results of analysis, textbook dialogues generally do not follow how an invitation sequence is organized in authentic English conversation as manifested by the inadequate or lacking presentation of a pre-invitation, and contain invitation practices that are not yet known to occur in English conversation. It was also found that an invitation is frequently portrayed as incidentally tendered due to its occurrence with certain turn components. Lastly, textbook dialogues provide a limited variety of input as shown by the lack of insert expansion instances and the limited presentation of responses in form and position. This research suggests the need to incorporate our knowledge of how conversation works into scripting dialogues for English learners. (177)

Abstract

As a primary source of input for language learning, textbooks provide learners with various language samples. This paper investigates whether Korean English textbooks provide an adequate language model to follow, particularly focusing on how an invitation is tendered and responded to. Dialogues that contain an invitation were pulled from seven high school English textbooks and analyzed from a Conversation Analytic (CA) perspective. According to the results of analysis, textbook dialogues generally do not follow how an invitation sequence is organized in authentic English conversation as manifested by the inadequate or lacking presentation of a pre-invitation, and contain invitation practices that are not yet known to occur in English conversation. It was also found that an invitation is frequently portrayed as incidentally tendered due to its occurrence with certain turn components. Lastly, textbook dialogues provide a limited variety of input as shown by the lack of insert expansion instances and the limited presentation of responses in form and position. This research suggests the need to incorporate our knowledge of how conversation works into scripting dialogues for English learners. (177)

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Bardovi-Harling, K, "Developing pragmatic awareness: Closing the conversation", ELT Journal, 45(1), pp.4~15 (1991)
  2. Bersten, S. G, "Using conversation analysis to evaluate pre-sequences in invitation, offer, and request dialogues in ESL textbooks", 석사, pp.2002
  3. Bouton, L. F, "Pragmatics and language learning. In Pragmatics and language learning vol. 7" (1996), University of Illinois, Division of English as an International Language
  4. Boxer, D, "Problems in the presentation of speech acts in ELT materials: The case of complaints", ELT Journal, 49(1), pp.44~58 (1995)
  5. Gilmore, A, "Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning", Language Teaching, 40(2), pp.97~118 (2007)
  6. Grant, L, "Screening appropriate teaching materials: Closings from textbooks and television soap operas", International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 39(1), pp.39~50 (2008)
  7. Holmes, J, "Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks", Applied Linguistics, 9(1), pp.21~44 (1988)
  8. Hutchby, I, "Conversation analysis" (1998), Polity Press
  9. 김해연, "ESL", EFL 교재와 고등학교 영어교과서 대화문에 나타난 수정 현상에 대한 비교 분석 연구, 2009, pp.9(3), 429~459[DOI]
  10. Scotton, C. M, "Natural conversations as a model for textbook dialogue", Applied Linguistics, 9(4), pp.372~384 (1988)
  11. dispreferred turn shapes. In Structure of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, "Agreeing and disagreeing with assessment: Some features of preferred", pp.1984, Pomerantz, A
  12. Pearson, E, "Agreement", disagreement: An example of results of discourse analysis applied to the oral English classroom, 1986, pp.74, 47~61
  13. Schegloff, E. A, "Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I" (2007), Cambridge University Press
  14. Schegloff, E. A, "Opening up closings", Semiotica, 7, pp.289~327 (1973)
  15. ten Haven,P, "Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide" (1999), Sage Publications
  16. Williams, M, "Language taught for meetings and language used in meetings: Is there anything in common?", Applied Linguistics, 9(1), pp.45~58 (1988)
  17. Wolfson, N, "Sociolinguistics and language acquisition", pp.116~128 (1983), Newbury House
  18. Wong, J, "Applying conversation analysis in applied linguistics: Evaluating dialogue in English as a second language textbooks", International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 40(1), pp.37~60 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)