본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Effects of the Sequence of Task Complexity in Different Modalities on the Learning of the English Past Tense

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study examines the effects of the sequence of increasing task complexity in different modalities on the learning of the English past tense of Korean secondary learners. Robinson’s (2007) Cognition Hypothesis argued that learners pay more attention to grammatical forms in complex tasks than in less complex tasks. He suggested that tasks should be sequenced in such a way that resource-dispersing dimensions are first increased in complexity followed by an increase in the complexity of resource-directing dimensions. However, little empirical research has been done on how tasks are sequenced according to their cognitive complexity and how task modality affects second language development in the sequence. Fifty-four learners were divided into an integrated (writing with oral interaction) task group (EG 1), an oral-only task group (EG 2) and a comparison group (CG). After the sequence of six tasks was completed, one-way ANOVA revealed the EGs outperformed the CG significantly on the posttest. The mean score of EG 1 was the highest, while the improvement rate of EG 2 was the highest among the three groups. It is hoped that this result will contribute to building a solid basis on which practitioners can make decisions about sequencing tasks and implementing task modality.

Abstract

This study examines the effects of the sequence of increasing task complexity in different modalities on the learning of the English past tense of Korean secondary learners. Robinson’s (2007) Cognition Hypothesis argued that learners pay more attention to grammatical forms in complex tasks than in less complex tasks. He suggested that tasks should be sequenced in such a way that resource-dispersing dimensions are first increased in complexity followed by an increase in the complexity of resource-directing dimensions. However, little empirical research has been done on how tasks are sequenced according to their cognitive complexity and how task modality affects second language development in the sequence. Fifty-four learners were divided into an integrated (writing with oral interaction) task group (EG 1), an oral-only task group (EG 2) and a comparison group (CG). After the sequence of six tasks was completed, one-way ANOVA revealed the EGs outperformed the CG significantly on the posttest. The mean score of EG 1 was the highest, while the improvement rate of EG 2 was the highest among the three groups. It is hoped that this result will contribute to building a solid basis on which practitioners can make decisions about sequencing tasks and implementing task modality.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Adams,R.J, "Learner-learner interactions:Implications for second language acquisition", 박사, pp.2004
  2. Adams,R.J, "L2 tasks and focus on form: A role for modality", The International Conference on Task-Based Language Teaching (2005)
  3. Baralt,M.L, "Task complexity,the cognition hypothesis,and interaction in CMC and FTF environments", 박사, pp.2010
  4. Bygate,M, "Introduction.In Researching pedagogic tasks:Second language learning teaching and testing", pp.1~20 (2001), Pearson
  5. Candlin,C, "Towards task-based language learning.In Language learning tasks", pp.5~22 (1987), Prentice Hall
  6. Chapelle,C, "Analysis of interaction sequences in computer-assisted language learning", TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), pp.753~757 (1998)
  7. Ellis,R, "Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse:Styling shifting in the use of the past tense", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9(1), pp.1~20 (1987)
  8. Ellis,R, "Task-based language learning and teaching" (2003), Oxford University Press
  9. -Hereand-Now dimensions:Effects on oral L2 production.In Investigating tasks in formal language learning, "The simultaneous manipulation along the planning time and +", pp.2007, Gilabert,R
  10. Hubert,M.D, "The relationship between writing and speaking in the U.S.university Spanish language classroom", 박사, pp.2008
  11. Huizenga,J, "Can you believe it? 2 & 3" (2000), Oxford University Press
  12. Iwashita,N, "Can we predict task difficulty in an oral proficiency test? Exploring the potential of and information-processing approach to task design", Language Learning, 51(3), pp.401~436 (2001)
  13. Kim,Y, "The effects of integrated language-based instruction in elementary ESL learning", The Modern Language Journal, 92(3), pp.431~451 (2008)
  14. Kim,Y.J, "The effect of task complexity on learner-learner interaction", System, 37(3), pp.254~268 (2009)
  15. Task,group,and task-based interactions, "Long,M", University of Hawaii, 1~26, pp.working papers in ESL 8 (1989)
  16. Nuevo,A.M, "Task complexity and interaction:L2 learning opportunities and development", 박사, pp.2006
  17. Nunan,D, "Designing tasks for the communicative classroom" (1989), Cambridge University Press
  18. Prabhu,N.S, "Second language pedagogy" (1987), Oxford University Press
  19. Révész,A, "Focus on form in task-based language teaching:Recasts,task complexity,and L2 learning", 박사, pp.2007
  20. Robinson,P, "Task complexity,task difficulty,and task production:Exploring interactions in a componential framework", Applied Linguistics, 22(1), pp.27~57 (2001)
  21. Robinson,P, "Cognitive complexity and task sequencing:Studies in a componential framework for second language task design", International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43(1), pp.1~32 (2005)
  22. Robinson,P, "Re-thinking for speaking,the Cognition Hypothesis,task classification and task sequencing", Plenaries Speech in TBLT in Hawaii, ~ (2007)
  23. Robinson,P, "Situating and distributing cognition across task demands:The SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing.In Cognitive processing in second language acquisition:Inside the learner’s mind", pp.243~268 (2010), John Benjamins Publishing Co
  24. Robinson,P, "Time and motion:Measuring the effects of the conceptual demands of tasks on second language speech production", Applied Linguistics, 30(4), pp.533~554 (2009)
  25. Robinson,P, "Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition" (2008), Routledge
  26. Robinson,P, "Task complexity,the cognition hypothesis and second language learning and performance", International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(2), pp.161~176 (2007)
  27. Skehan,P, "A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction", Applied Linguistics, 17(1), pp.38~62 (1996)
  28. Skehan,P, "Cognition and tasks.In Cognition and second language instruction", pp.183~205 (2001), Cambridge University Press
  29. Weissberg,B, "Developmental relationships in the acquisition of English syntax:writing vs.speech", Learning and Instruction, 10(1), pp.37~53 (2000)
  30. Yuan,F, "The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency,complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production", Applied Linguistics, 24(1), pp.1~27 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)