본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Roles of Receptive and Productive Vocabulary Knowledge in L2 Writing through the Mediation of L2 Reading Ability

최연희
한국영어교육학회 (Korea Association Of Teachers Of English)|2017.03|영어교육 (English Teaching)|제72권 제1호|pp. 3-24

1

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

L2 writingL2 vocabulary knowledgeEFL readingL2 readingreceptive vocabularyproductive vocabularyEFL writing
주제분류영어와문학

초록

The present study aims to investigate the direct and indirect contributions of Korean EFL college students’ L2 receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge to their L2 writing performances by using a structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis with a goal to explore the pathways of vocabulary knowledge to writing. Data from 178 students were collected through tests of receptive and productive vocabulary breadth and depth, a writing test and a reading test. In testing a hypothesized model on the roles of receptive and productive vocabulary in writing, the results of the SEM analysis reveal the direct role of productive vocabulary in writing. The indirect role of receptive vocabulary on writing was observed through the mediating role of productive vocabulary or reading ability due to the direct contribution of receptive vocabulary to both productive vocabulary and reading and that of productive vocabulary and reading to writing. Findings from the study shed light on the relations of L2 receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge with L2 writing abilities, suggesting potential benefits of both receptive and productive vocabulary learning for L2 writing.

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate the direct and indirect contributions of Korean EFL college students’ L2 receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge to their L2 writing performances by using a structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis with a goal to explore the pathways of vocabulary knowledge to writing. Data from 178 students were collected through tests of receptive and productive vocabulary breadth and depth, a writing test and a reading test. In testing a hypothesized model on the roles of receptive and productive vocabulary in writing, the results of the SEM analysis reveal the direct role of productive vocabulary in writing. The indirect role of receptive vocabulary on writing was observed through the mediating role of productive vocabulary or reading ability due to the direct contribution of receptive vocabulary to both productive vocabulary and reading and that of productive vocabulary and reading to writing. Findings from the study shed light on the relations of L2 receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge with L2 writing abilities, suggesting potential benefits of both receptive and productive vocabulary learning for L2 writing.

참고문헌 (55)

  1. Alavi, S. M., "The role of vocabulary size in predicting performance on TOEFL reading item types", System, 40, pp.376~385 (2012)
  2. Anderson, R. C., "Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews", pp.77~117 (1981), International Reading Association
  3. Belanger, J., "Theory and research into reading and writing connections : A critical review", Reading-Canada-Lecture, 5(1), pp.10~18 (1987)
  4. 최연희, "Training EFL Learners How to Benefit from Teacher Feedback in Writing Revision", 교과교육학연구, 18(1), pp.215~241 (2014), 교과교육연구소
  5. 전유아, "L2 Collocational Knowledge by Congruency and Writing Proficiency of EFL University Learners", 영어어문교육, 21(1), pp.49~74 (2015), 한국영어어문교육학회
  6. Clark, E., "The lexicon in acquisition" (1993), Cambridge University Press
  7. Daller, H., "Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge", pp.234~244 (2007), Cambridge University Press
  8. Eisterhold, J. C., "Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom", pp.88~101 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  9. Engber, C., "The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions", Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, pp.139~155 (1995)
  10. Fan, M., "How big is the gap and how to narrow it? An investigation into the active and passive vocabulary knowledge of L2 learners", RELC Journal, 31, pp.105~119 (2000)
  11. Henriksen, B., "Three dimensions of vocabulary development", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, pp.303~317 (1999)
  12. Horiba, Y., "Word knowledge and its relation to reading comprehension : A comparative study of Chinese-and Korean-speaking L2 learners and L1 speakers of Japanese", The Modern Language Journal, 96, pp.108~121 (2012)
  13. 허윤지, "The Relative Predicting Power of Vocabulary Depth and Grammar in Korean EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension", 응용언어학, 30(3), pp.3~25 (2014), 한국응용언어학회
  14. Ito, F., "L2 reading-writing correlation in Japanese EFL high school students", The Language Teachers, 35(5), pp.23~29 (2011)
  15. 강혜승, "The Relationship between Different Dimensions of Lexical Proficiency and Writing Quality of Korean EFL Learners", 응용언어학, 27(3), pp.81~104 (2011), 한국응용언어학회
  16. 김은주, "Unique Contribution of Vocabulary Depth to Korean EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension: A Structural Equation Modeling Study within the Simple View of Reading", 응용언어학, 30(3), pp.51~75 (2014), 한국응용언어학회
  17. 김경자, "Factors affecting English reading comprehension of Korean middle school students", 영어영문학연구, 57(1), pp.45~64 (2015), 한국중앙영어영문학회
  18. 김성연, "Korean college students’ vocabulary profiles as predictors of English reading and writing proficiency", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 12(3), pp.93~115 (2009), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회
  19. Koda, K., "The effects of transferred vocabulary knowledge on the development of L2 reading proficiency", Foreign Language Annals, 22, pp.529~540 (1989)
  20. Kroll, B., "Reading in the composition classroom", pp.61~81 (1993), Heinle & Heinle
  21. Laufer, B., "Second language vocabulary acquisition", pp.20~34 (1997), Cambridge University Press
  22. Laufer, B., "The development of passive and active vocabulary in second language: same or different?", Applied Linguistics, 19, pp.255~271 (1998)
  23. Laufer, B., "Vocabulary size and use : Lexical richness in L2written production", Applied Linguistics, 16, pp.307~322 (1995)
  24. Laufer, B., "A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability", Language Testing, 16, pp.33~51 (1999)
  25. 이신웅, "Korean EFL University Students’ English Vocabulary Size and Their Writing Proficiency", 영어교과교육, 13(2), pp.21~43 (2014), 한국영어교과교육학회
  26. 이신웅, "Korean EFL Learners’ Productive Collocation Knowledge and Its Relationship to Their Writing Proficiency", 영어어문교육, 21(4), pp.59~84 (2015), 한국영어어문교육학회
  27. Li, M., "The effects of vocabulary breadth and depth on English reading", Applied Linguistics, 36, pp.611~634 (2015)
  28. Don Makarchuk, "University Freshmen’s EFL Receptive and Productive Recall Vocabulary Knowledge and Use", 영어교육, 68(4), pp.217~239 (2013), 한국영어교육학회
  29. Meara, P. M., "Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy", pp.109~121 (1997), Cambridge University Press
  30. Nassaji, H., "Higher-level and lower-level text processing skills in advanced ESL reading comprehension", The Modern Language Journal, 87, pp.261~276 (2003)
  31. Nation, I. S. P., "Teaching and learning vocabulary" (1990), Heinle & Heinle
  32. Nation, I. S. P., "Learning vocabulary in another language" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  33. "Vocabulary size test (bilingual Korean version)" (2010)[URL]
  34. Nation, I. S. P., "A vocabulary size test", The Language Teacher, 31(7), pp.9~13 (2007)
  35. Oh, E., "The contributions of planning, L2 linguistic knowledge and individual differences to L2 writing", The Journal of Asia TEFL, 12(2), pp.45~85 (2015)
  36. Petrosky, A., "From story to essay : Reading and writing", College Composition and Communication, 32, pp.19~36 (1982)
  37. Qian, D. D., "Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension", The Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, pp.282~307 (1999)
  38. Qian, D. D., "Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance : An assessment perspective", Language Learning, 52, pp.513~536 (2002)
  39. Read, J., "The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge", Language Testing, 10, pp.355~371 (1993)
  40. Read, J., "Validation in language assessment", pp.41~60 (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum
  41. Read, J., "Assessing vocabulary" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  42. Read, J., "A framework for second language vocabulary assessment", Language Testing, 18, pp.1~32 (2001)
  43. Schoonen, R., "First language and second language writing : The role of linguistic knowledge, speed of processing and metacognitive knowledge", Language Learning, 53, pp.165~202 (2003)
  44. Schoonen, R., "Modeling the development of L1 and EFL writing proficiency of secondary school students", Language Learning, 61, pp.31~79 (2011)
  45. Shanahan, T., "An analysis and comparison of theoretical theory of the writing process", Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, pp.116~123 (1986)
  46. Shim, Jaewoo, "Exploring Reading and Writing Connection: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach", 영어교육, 59(2), pp.59~74 (2004), 한국영어교육학회
  47. 신동광, "Receptive and Productive Vocabulary Sizes of High School Learners: What Next for the Basic Word List?", 영어교육, 66(3), pp.123~148 (2011), 한국영어교육학회
  48. Stæhr, L. S., "Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading, and writing", Language Learning Journal, 36, pp.139~152 (2008)
  49. Stotsky, S., "Research on reading", writing relationships : A synthesis and suggested directions, 1983, pp.60, 627~642
  50. Webb, S., "Receptive vocabulary and productive vocabulary sizes of L2 learners", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, pp.79~95 (2008)
  51. Yi, B., "Working memory and lexical knowledge in L2 argumentative writing", Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 23, pp.83~102 (2013)
  52. 윤현숙, "한국 학생들의 영어 작문에 나타난 생산적 어휘에 관한 분석", 영어학, 10(1), pp.86~104 (2010), 한국영어학회
  53. Yu, G., "Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances", Applied Linguistics, 31, pp.236~259 (2009)
  54. Zhang, D., "Vocabulary and grammar knowledge in second language reading comprehension : A structural equation modeling study", The Modern Language Journal, 96, pp.558~575 (2012)
  55. Hua Flora Zhong, "The relationship between receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge: a perspective from vocabulary use in sentence writing", The Language Learning Journal, pp.1~17 (2017), Informa UK Limited[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Does Reading Mediate the Relation Between Productive Vocabulary and Writing or Is It the Other Way Around?강유선, 문영선한국영어교육학회 · 영어교육2023 · 제78권 제4호Does Reading and Vocabulary Knowledge of Advanced Korean EFL Learners Facilitate Their Writing Performance?강유선, 문영선, 최지혜아시아테플 · Journal of Asia TEFL2019 · 제16권 제1호A Study on Different Dimensions of Vocabulary Knowledge Influencing English Writing Performance최종갑대한영어영문학회 · 영어영문학연구2022 · 제48권 제4호Vocabulary knowledge as predictor of EFL university students’ writing performance조영교팬코리아영어교육학회 · 영어교육연구2024 · 제36권 제4호Korean EFL University Students’ English Vocabulary Size and Their Writing Proficiency이신웅한국영어교과교육학회 · 영어교과교육2014 · 제13권 제2호Korean college students’ vocabulary profiles as predictors of English reading and writing proficiency김성연, 류영숙한국멀티미디어언어교육학회 · 멀티미디어 언어교육2009 · 제12권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

Variations in Learning Strategy Use Among Good, Average and Poor EFL LearnersDon Makarchukpp. 25-47South Korean Novice English Language Teachers’ Experience of Induction into Teaching장경숙, David Hayespp. 49-71Topic Initiation in Conversation-for-Learning: Developmental and Pedagogical PerspectivesYounhee Kimpp. 73-103Pre-service L2 Teacher Trainees’ Reflection: What Do They Focus On?조민영pp. 105-129The Nature of Peer Interaction: Role Relationships Formed in Pair Interaction김윤희pp. 131-158
원문 보기