On semantic extension of verb-particle constructions: the cases of stand up and stand out
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Traditionally, verb-particle constructions have been regarded as inexplicable because the whole meaning of them does not seem to be directly interpretable based on the individual verbs and particles. However, Lindner (1981, 1982) and Morgan (1997) have successfully shown how the meanings of verb-particle constructions can be explained within the framework of cognitive semantics. However, they have not delved into the question how the literal combination of a verb and a particle extends its meaning through metaphor and metonymy. Bridging the gap, this paper deals with the cases where verbs and particles combine literally, but the combinations later on extend their meanings through metaphor, metonymy and sometimes through conceptual complexes of metaphor and metonymy, which is called metaphtonymy. As a showcase, the paper deals with how the literal combination of stand and up and that of stand and out develop their meanings through the metaphtonymic extensions based on the experiential basis of the real actions of standing up and standing out.
Abstract
Traditionally, verb-particle constructions have been regarded as inexplicable because the whole meaning of them does not seem to be directly interpretable based on the individual verbs and particles. However, Lindner (1981, 1982) and Morgan (1997) have successfully shown how the meanings of verb-particle constructions can be explained within the framework of cognitive semantics. However, they have not delved into the question how the literal combination of a verb and a particle extends its meaning through metaphor and metonymy. Bridging the gap, this paper deals with the cases where verbs and particles combine literally, but the combinations later on extend their meanings through metaphor, metonymy and sometimes through conceptual complexes of metaphor and metonymy, which is called metaphtonymy. As a showcase, the paper deals with how the literal combination of stand and up and that of stand and out develop their meanings through the metaphtonymic extensions based on the experiential basis of the real actions of standing up and standing out.
참고문헌 (10)
- 최영주, "Going Back to Metaphtonymy in Neologism", 담화와 인지, 21(3), pp.261~280 (2014), 담화·인지언어학회
- Geeraerts, Dirk, "Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast", pp.435~465 (2002), Mouton de Gruyter
- Goossens, Louis, "Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast", pp.349~377 (1990), Mouton de Gruyter
- Lakoff, George, "Metaphors we live by" (1980), University of Chicago Press
- Lindner, Susan, "A lexico-semantic analysis of verb-particle constructions with up and out", Ph.D., pp.1981
- Lindner, Susan, "What goes up doesn’t necessarily come down: The ins and outs of opposites", Papers from the eighteenth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.305~323 (1982), Chicago Linguistics Society
- Morgan, Pamela S., "Figuring out figure out: Metaphor and semantics of the English verb-particle construction", Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), pp.327~357 (1997)
- Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco J., "Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual interaction", Atlantis, 19(1), pp.281~295 (1997)
- Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco J., "Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast" (2002), Mouton de Gruyter
- Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco J., "Going beyond metaphtonymy: Metaphoric and metonymic complexes in phrasal verb interpretation", Language Value, 3(1), pp.1~29 (2011)