집행기능, 작업기억 그리고 통계적 학습 능력이 한국어 모어 독자의 관형절 중의성 해소에 미치는 영향

키워드

참고문헌 (72)

1. 권유안, "관계절 두어(head noun)의 정보와 조사의 정보를 이용한 한국어 문장의 재분석과정", Communication Sciences and Disorders, 8(1), pp.41~65 (2003), 한국언어청각임상학회
2. 이윤형, "작업기억의 개인차와 문장의 이해", Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 14(2), pp.825~836 (2012), 한국자료분석학회[DOI]
3. 이은하, "통계적 학습 능력이 한국어 학습자의 인접․비인접 통사구조 처리․학습에 미치는 영향", 한국언어문화학, 17(1), pp.233~282 (2020), 국제한국언어문화학회
4. 이은하, "한국어 모어 화자와 한국어 학습자의 수여구문 어순에 대한 구조적 점화", 외국어교육연구, 34(2), pp.85~131 (2020), 외국어교육연구소[DOI]
5. Altmann, Gerry T. M, "Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference", Cognition, 73(3), pp.247~264 (1999)[DOI]
6. Baayen, R. Harald, "Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items", Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), pp.390~412 (2008)[DOI]
7. Barr, Dale. J., "Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal", Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), pp.255~278 (2013)[DOI]
8. Bornkessel, Ina D., "On the cost of syntactic ambiguity in human language comprehension: An individual differences approach", Cognitive Brain Research, 21(1), pp.11~21 (2004)[DOI]
9. Box, George E. P., "An analysis of transformations", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 26(2), pp.211~243 (1964)[DOI]
10. Christiansen, Morten H., "Similar neural correlates for language and sequential learning: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. language and cognitive processes", Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(2), pp.231~256 (2012)[DOI]
11. Christianson, Kiel, "Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger", Cognitive Psychology, 42(4), pp.368~407 (2001)[DOI]
12. Corsi, Philip Michael, "Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain", Ph.D, pp.1972
13. Daneman, Meredyth, "Individual differences in working memory and reading", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), pp.450~466 (1980)[DOI]
14. Engelhardt, Paul E., "Executive function and intelligence in the resolution of temporary syntactic ambiguity: An individual differences investigation", Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(7), pp.1263~1281 (2017)[DOI]
15. Fan, Jin, "Assessing the heritability of attentional networks", BMC Neuroscience, 2(1), pp.1~7 (2001)[DOI]
16. Fedorenko, Evelina, "The role of domain-general cognitive control in language comprehension", Frontiers in Psychology, 5, pp.1~17 (2014)[DOI]
17. Ferreira, Fernanda, "The independence of syntactic processing", Journal of Memory and Language, 25(3), pp.348~368 (1986)[DOI]
18. Fiebach, Christian J., "Neural correlates of syntactic ambiguity in sentence comprehension for low and high span readers", Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(9), pp.1562~1575 (2004)[DOI]
19. Friederici, Angela D., "The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: Functional localization and structural connectivity", Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America, 103(7), pp.2458~2463 (2006)
20. Friederici, Angela D., "Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses", Biological Psychology, 47(3), pp.193~221 (1998)[DOI]
21. Gernsbacher, Morton A., "The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(2), pp.245~262 (1991)[DOI]
22. Grodner, Daniel, "Syntactic complexity in ambiguity resolution", Journal of Memory and Language, 46(2), pp.267~295 (2002)[DOI]
23. Korean linguistics, vol. 7, "Japanese", pp.1998, Hirose, Yuki
24. Hirose, Yuki, "Syntax and semantics (vol. 31): Sentence processing: A crosslinguistic perspective", pp.71~93 (1998), Academic Press
25. Hsu, Nina S., "Direct impact of cognitive control on sentence processing and comprehension", Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 36(2), pp.211~239 (2021)[DOI]
26. Hsu, Nina S., "Dynamic engagement of cognitive control modulates recovery from misinterpretation during real-time language processing", Psychological Science, 27(4), pp.572~582 (2016)[DOI]
27. Huang, Yi Ting, "Developmental parsing and linguistic knowledge: Reexamining the role of cognitive control in the kindergarten path effect", Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 184, pp.210~219 (2019)[DOI]
28. Hubbard, Catherine S., "Increased attentional network functioning related to symptom severity measures in females with irritable bowel syndrome", Neurogastroenterology & Motility, 27(9), pp.1282~1294 (2015)[DOI]
29. Inoue, Atsu, "A comparative study of parsing in english and japanese", Ph.D, pp.1991
30. James, Ariel N., "Individual differences in syntactic processing: Is there evidence for reader-text interactions?", Journal of Memory and Language, 102, pp.155~181 (2018)[DOI]
31. January, David, "Co-Localization of Stroop and syntactic ambiguity resolution in Broca's area: Implications for the neural basis of sentence processing", Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(12), pp.2434~2444 (2009)[DOI]
32. Just, Marcel A., "A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory", Psychological Review, 99(1), pp.122~149 (1992)[DOI]
33. 강소영, "What Can Ambiguous Dative NPs in Korean Tell us about Clausal Processing?", 언어와언어학, (65), pp.1~20 (2014), 언어연구소
34. Kaschak, Michael P., "Structural priming as implicit learning : Cumulative priming effects and individual differences", Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18(6), pp.1133~1139 (2011)[DOI]
35. Kaufman, Scott Barry, "Implicit learning as an ability", Cognition, 116(3), pp.321~340 (2010)[DOI]
36. Kidd, Evan, "Individual differences in syntactic priming in language acquisition", Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(2), pp.393~418 (2012)[DOI]
37. Key-DeLyria, Sarah, "Executive function and ambiguous sentence comprehension", American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 25(2), pp.1~16 (2016)[DOI]
38. 김지현, "Sentence processing in Korean: Effects of sentence complexity", 담화와 인지, 16(2), pp.21~39 (2009), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
39. 김지현, "The influence of sentence complexity and working memory on relative clause ambiguity resolution", 언어와언어학, (48), pp.1~26 (2010), 언어연구소
40. Kim, Ji Hyon, "Sentence complexity and working memory effects in ambiguity resolution", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42(5), pp.393~411 (2013)[DOI]
41. Kuznetsova, Alexandra, "lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models", Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), pp.1~26 (2017)[DOI]
42. "Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R Package Version 1.6.3" (2021)[URL]
43. 이다미, "A Sentence Processing Study of Relative Clauses in Korean with Two Attachment Sites", 담화와 인지, 11(2), pp.125~140 (2004), 담화·인지언어학회
44. Long, Debra L., "Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution : Readers vary in their use of plausibility information", Memory and Cognition, 36(2), pp.375~391 (2008)[DOI]
45. MacDonald, Maryellen C., "Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity", Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), pp.56~98 (1992)[DOI]
46. MacLeod, Jeffrey W., "Appraising the ANT: Psychometric and theoretical considerations of the attention network test", Neuropsychology, 24(5), pp.637~651 (2010)[DOI]
47. Mazuka, Reiko, "Japanese sentence processing", pp.295~330 (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
48. Misyak, Jennifer B., "Extending statistical learning farther and further: Long-distance dependencies, and individual differences in statistical learning and language", Proceeding of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society, 29, pp.1307~1312 (2007)
49. Misyak, Jennifer B., "When ‘more’ in statistical learning means ‘less’ in language: Individual differences in predictive processing of adjacent dependencies", Proceedings of the annual conference of the cognitive science society, 32, pp.2686~2691 (2010)
50. Misyak, Jennifer B., "On-line individual differences in statistical learning predict language processing", Frontiers in Psychology, 1, pp.31~ (2010)[DOI]
51. Misyak, Jennifer B., "Statistical learning and language: An individual differences study", Language Learning, 62(1), pp.302~331 (2012)[DOI]
52. Nicenboim, Bruno, "Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution", Frontiers in Psychology, 6, pp.312~ (2015)[DOI]
53. Novick, Jared M., "Clearing the garden-path: Improving sentence processing through cognitive control training. Language", Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(2), pp.186~217 (2014)[DOI]
54. Novick, Jared M., "A Case for conflict across multiple domains: Memory and language impairments following damage to ventrolateral prefrontal cortex", Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26, pp.527~567 (2009)[DOI]
55. Parsons, Sam, "Splithalf: Robust estimates of split half reliability (version 4)", ~ (2020)
56. Pearlmutter, Neal J., "Individual differences and probabilistic constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution", Journal of Memory and Language, 34(4), pp.521~542 (1995)[DOI]
57. Peirce, Jonathan, "Building experiments in psychopy" (2018), Sage
58. Phillips, Louise H, "The role of memory in the tower of london task", Memory, 7(2), pp.209~231 (1999)[DOI]
59. Qi, Zhenghan, "Hearing matters more than seeing: A cross-modality study of statistical learning and reading ability", Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(1), pp.101~115 (2019)[DOI]
60. "R: A language and environment for statistical computing" (2021)[URL]
61. "Psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research" (2021)[URL]
62. Schad, Daniel J., "How to capitalize on a priori contrasts in linear (mixed) models: A tutorial", Journal of Memory and Language, 110, pp.104038~ (2020)[DOI]
63. Shallice, Timothy, "From neuropsychology to mental structure" (1988), Cambridge University Press
64. Siegelman, Noam, "Statistical learning as an individual ability: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence", Journal of Memory and Language, 81, pp.105~120 (2015)[DOI]
65. Sturt, Patrick, "Structural change and reanalysis difficulty in language comprehension", Journal of Memory and Language, 40(1), pp.136~150 (1999)[DOI]
66. Swets, Benjamin, "Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities : Evidence from self-paced reading", Memory and Cognition, 36(1), pp.201~216 (2008)[DOI]
67. Reanalysis costs in processing japanese sentences with complex np structures and homonyms: Individual differences and verbal working memory constraints, "Tokimoto, Shingo", Japanese Cognitive Science Society, ~, pp.Technical report JCSS-TR-53 (2004)
68. Van Dyke, Julie A., "Low working memory capacity is only spuriously related to poor reading comprehension", Cognition, 131(3), pp.373~403 (2014)[DOI]
69. Vuong, Loan C., "Domain-specific executive control and the revision of misinterpretations in sentence comprehension", Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(3), pp.312~325 (2014)[DOI]
70. Ward, Geoff, "Planning and problem solving using the five disc tower of London task", The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 50(1), pp.49~78 (1997)[DOI]
71. Waters, Gloria S., "Processing resource capacity and the comprehension of garden path sentences", Memory and Cognition, 24(3), pp.342~355 (1996)[DOI]
72. Ye, Zheng, "Executive control in language processing", Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(8), pp.1168~1177 (2009)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천