집단 차별어의 의미론과 화용론
The Semantics and Pragmatics of Slurs. Discourse and Cognition
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study adopts research methods from the philosophy of language to present the categorical properties of slurs and to compare and evaluate the various arguments raised by competing theories. Slurs belong to the subtypes of unethical or hate speech that have been studied in the literature, but they have distinctive characteristics that make them an independent category. First, slurs are characterized by the fact that it targets a homogeneous group of people. While profanity, which falls under the category of unethical expression, shows discrimination or hatred regardless of the individual or group, slurs are limited to a single group. Because the group they refer to is clear, slurs are paired with neutral correspondents that refer to the same audience. In addition, the negative attitudes contained in slurs are directed at a specific group, rather than at an individual. Other important characteristics of slurs include scopelessness, appropriation, and autonomy of attack. In this study, I examine the features, advantages, and disadvantages of various semantic, hybrid, and pragmatic approaches. The significance of this study is that it broadens the horizon of research on theoretical trends in the study of slurs based on the perspectives of linguistic philosophy and semantics.
Abstract
This study adopts research methods from the philosophy of language to present the categorical properties of slurs and to compare and evaluate the various arguments raised by competing theories. Slurs belong to the subtypes of unethical or hate speech that have been studied in the literature, but they have distinctive characteristics that make them an independent category. First, slurs are characterized by the fact that it targets a homogeneous group of people. While profanity, which falls under the category of unethical expression, shows discrimination or hatred regardless of the individual or group, slurs are limited to a single group. Because the group they refer to is clear, slurs are paired with neutral correspondents that refer to the same audience. In addition, the negative attitudes contained in slurs are directed at a specific group, rather than at an individual. Other important characteristics of slurs include scopelessness, appropriation, and autonomy of attack. In this study, I examine the features, advantages, and disadvantages of various semantic, hybrid, and pragmatic approaches. The significance of this study is that it broadens the horizon of research on theoretical trends in the study of slurs based on the perspectives of linguistic philosophy and semantics.
참고문헌 (31)
- 강기수, "욕(辱)의 교육인간학적 기능", 석당논총, 50, pp.537~580 (2011)
- 남길임, "사용역에 따른 비윤리적 표현의 분포와 사용 양상 연구", 사회언어학, 30(3), pp.91~119 (2022)
- 박대아, "남성혐오표현의 유형과 사용 양상", 우리어문연구, 62(0), pp.273~304 (2018)
- 송현주, "차별과 혐오 표현의 식별과 사전 활용의 쟁점-메신저 대화말뭉치를 중심으로", 동서인문, 20, pp.5~36 (2022)
- 이연호, "온라인 상에서 나타나는 외국 및 외국인에 대한 혐오 인식-2019-2021년도 온라인 뉴스 기사 댓글 텍스트 마이닝 분석을 중심으로-", 한국사회복지학, 74(1), pp.107~131 (2022)
- 이준효, "페미니즘과 테러리즘", 철학적 분석, 45, pp.61~95 (2021)
- 조태린, "차별적 언어 표현과 사회 갈등의 문제", 나라사랑, 120, pp.388~410 (2011)
- Anderson, Luvell, "Slurring Words", Noûs, 47(1), pp.25~48 (2013)[DOI]
- Anderson, Luvell, "What Did You Call Me? Slurs as Prohibited Words setting things up", Analytic Philosophy, 54(3), pp.350~363 (2013)[DOI]
- Bach, Kent, "Bad Words:Philosophical Perspectives on Slurs", pp.60~76 (2018)
- Bianchi, Claudia, "Slurs and appropriation : An echoic account", Journal of Pragmatics, 66, pp.35~44 (2014)[DOI]
- Bolinger, Renée J, "The pragmatics of slurs", Noûs, 51(3), pp.439~462 (2017)
- Croom, Adam M., "Slurs", Language Sciences, 33(3), pp.343~358 (2011)[DOI]
- Croom, Adam M, "The semantics of slurs : A refutation of coreferentialism", Ampersand, 2, pp.30~38 (2015)[DOI]
- Dummett, Michael, "Frege : philosophy of language" (1973), Harper & Row Publishing
- Gutzmann, Daniel, "Beyond Expressives: Explorations in Use-Conditional Meaning", pp.1~58 (2013), Brill
- Meaning. Brill, "Use-conditional meaning: Studies in multidimensional semantics" (2015), Oxford University Press
- Hare, Richard M, "Freedom and reason" (1963), Oxford University Press
- Hess, Leopold, "Slurs and expressive commitments", Acta Analytica : Philosophy and Psychology, 36(2), pp.263~290 (2021)[DOI]
- Hom, Christopher, "The semantics of racial epithets", The Journal of Philosophy, 105(8), pp.416~440 (2008)[DOI]
- Hom, Christopher, "Pejoratives", Philosophy Compass, 5(2), pp.164~185 (2010)[DOI]
- Hom, Christopher, "Moral and Semantic Innocence", Analytic Philosophy, 54(3), pp.293~313 (2013)[DOI]
- Jeshion, Robin, "Slurs and Strereotypes", Analytic Philosophy, 54(3), pp.314~329 (2013)
- Kaplan, David, "The meaning of ouch and oops: Explorations in the theory of meaning as use", pp.1999
- McCready, Elin, "Varieties of conventional implicature", Semantics and Pragmatics, 3(8), pp.1~57 (2010)[DOI]
- Nunberg, Geoffrey, "New Work on Speech Act" (2018), Oxford University Press
- Potts, Christopher, "The Logic of Conventional Implicatures" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Potts, Christopher, "The expressive dimension", Theoretical Linguistics, 33, pp.165~197 (2007)[DOI]
- Potts, Christopher, "Semantics: An Internationa l Handbook of Natural Language Meaning Volume 3", pp.2516~2536 (2012), Mouton de Gruyter
- Vallée, Richard, "Slurring and common knowledge of ordinary language", Journal of Pragmatics, 61, pp.78~90 (2014)[DOI]
- Williamson, Timothy, "The Philosophy of David Kaplan", pp.137~158 (2009)