본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

지역 어메니티 촉진을 위한 마을만들기 운영사례 비교연구

A comparative case study of neighbourhood makingfor promoting a local amenity

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농학

초록

The aim of the research was to analyze programs, outcomes, promotion process, and operation methods of neighbourhood making to provide basic information for progressive improvement directions in the future. Buk-gu in Gwanju city, samdeok-dong in Daegu city and dongpirang in Tongyeong city were selected for a comparative analysis. The main bodies of neighbourhood making for promoting a local amenity were analysed for this research. The results indicated that a voluntary and continuous participation of residents was expected in the case of neighbourhood making led by the residents. However, a steady budget support from the outside was necessary for the continuous management and improvement of neighbourhood organization. For this, a voluntary agreement was required through the consultative group and committee formation. The member of civil organization has a limitation in the ability to develop and maintain continuos activities in the case of neighbourhood making led by a civil organization. This research found that operation methods including the constant checking, the search for new ideas through assessment of the resident’s participation, local festivals for a community formation and real satisfactions of residents’ desires were needed in the neighbourhood making led by a civil organization. A participation rate in neighbourhood making was low in the case of neighbourhood making led by administrative bodies. This result indicated that the long-term strategics for space renewal and community revitalization were important. Various easy ways of residents’ participation to reflect their interests and operation systems were also needed. Finally, current local issues, active residents’ participation and residents’ opinions would be included in the process of neighbour making in the future.

Abstract

The aim of the research was to analyze programs, outcomes, promotion process, and operation methods of neighbourhood making to provide basic information for progressive improvement directions in the future. Buk-gu in Gwanju city, samdeok-dong in Daegu city and dongpirang in Tongyeong city were selected for a comparative analysis. The main bodies of neighbourhood making for promoting a local amenity were analysed for this research. The results indicated that a voluntary and continuous participation of residents was expected in the case of neighbourhood making led by the residents. However, a steady budget support from the outside was necessary for the continuous management and improvement of neighbourhood organization. For this, a voluntary agreement was required through the consultative group and committee formation. The member of civil organization has a limitation in the ability to develop and maintain continuos activities in the case of neighbourhood making led by a civil organization. This research found that operation methods including the constant checking, the search for new ideas through assessment of the resident’s participation, local festivals for a community formation and real satisfactions of residents’ desires were needed in the neighbourhood making led by a civil organization. A participation rate in neighbourhood making was low in the case of neighbourhood making led by administrative bodies. This result indicated that the long-term strategics for space renewal and community revitalization were important. Various easy ways of residents’ participation to reflect their interests and operation systems were also needed. Finally, current local issues, active residents’ participation and residents’ opinions would be included in the process of neighbour making in the future.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 김남두, "주민참여 마을 만들기 사업의 유형별 특성 분석", 석사, 도시공학, pp.2006
  2. 김은경, "도시문화프로젝트 : 통영 동피랑 벽화마을", 대한지방행정공제회, 47(523), pp.60~63 (2012)
  3. 김은경, "브라보 My파트너 : 광주광역 시 북구 주민자치과 마을만들기킴-주민참여로 특화 된 마을만들기 전형을 보여주다", 대한지방행정공제회, 60(694), pp.52~55 (2011)
  4. 김인환, "어메니티를 활용한 문화도시 활성화 방안", 석사, 정책학, pp.2008
  5. 대한국토도시계획학회, "농촌계획의 이론과 실제" (2006), 普成閣
  6. 마은주, "지속가능한 개발을 위해 어메니티를 활용한 지역개발 사례연구-어메니티에 기반을 둔 국내외 지역개발 사례를 중심으로-", 한국디자인포럼, 19(19), pp.17~26 (2008), 한국디자인트렌드학회
  7. 문종화, "지방자치 발전을 위한 마을 만들기 사업 연구", 한국지역사회발전 논문집, 37(1), pp.75~87 (2012)
  8. 박현옥, "국내 마을만들기 사업에서 나타난 주민참여형 공공디자인 표현특성 연구 - 대구 삼덕동, 광주 북구, 마산시를 중심으로 -", 한국디자인문화학회지, 14(4), pp.205~216 (2008), 한국디자인문화학회
  9. 송혜승, "주민 참여 마을 만들기의 선호사업에 관한 연구 - 광주광역시 북구 문화동을 중심으로", 국토계획, 43(3), pp.37~53 (2008), 대한국토·도시계획학회
  10. 심재봉, "주민참여형 마을 만들기 활성화 방안에 관한 연구 : 광주광역시 북구청을 중심으로", 석사, 지방자치, pp.2006
  11. 광주광역시 북구의 마을만들기 추진 현황과 과제, "이명규", 광주광역시 북구, ~ (2007)
  12. 지방자치발전을 위한 마을만들기 사 업 활성화 방안 : 광주광역시 북구와 광주 YMCA 사례를 중심으로, "이용연", 한국도시행정학회, ~ (2004)
  13. 이훈규, "『좋은 동네 만들기』의 활성화 방안 연구 : 광주YMCA와 북구청 사례를 중심으로", 석사, 지방자치, pp.2004
  14. 대구광역시 마을만들기와 담 장허물기의 연계방안, "조득환", 대구광역시, ~ (2005)
  15. 조순제, "지방자치와 주민참여 : 근린조직의 활성화를 중심으로", 사회과학연구, 6(2), pp.349~369 (1999)
  16. 조윤미, "국내 벽화마을만들기의 성공요건 분석", 석사, 도시설계학, pp.2011

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)