조망거리에 따른 농촌경관의 농촌다움 평가에 관한 연구
A Study on Evaluation of the Rurality by the Distance of View
1
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Improve the rural views of the Government and the municipalities with the intention of rural landscape planning. However, rural scenery evaluation of landscape types and element categories, landscape scenes, such as the valuation of resources selected, form a coherent system and ecological point of view is not only a Visual perspective of evaluation, or evaluation is made. This study evaluates the rural landscape through the rural landscape for rurality is implemented can explain the image. Rural amenity 100 represented the rural landscape in rurality with photos of photos, and scenes, photos, location-based rural Vista rurality landscapes drawn components. Selected landscape photography scenic landscapes in the u.s. survey and image vocabularies through surveys is representative of the landscape in rurality of each Vista location-specific photos and images began extracted factors. As a result, the Distant view is a town and village in the rolling hills of the surrounding environment is an image behind the Vista Skyline, Farmland Rural village forests, Behind the hills, Individual housing roof, Housing arrangement, The number of household includes landscape components. Factor analysis ‘openness’, ‘intimacy’, ‘activity’, ‘complexity’, ‘safety’ was down to five factors, such as a description of the overall factors that force was 66.45 percent. Middle distance view is close to being out of town houses and village environment, an image in the skyline hills Vista, farmlands, village forests, rolling hills, behind the scenes of the housing component of the neck, the sperm will honor an individual factor analysis results are ‘intimacy’, ‘safety’, ‘openness’, ‘specificity’, ‘complexity’ five factors the whole description of the capacity factors compared to 67.24 percent. Close-range view is mainly in Vista village embraced the individual elements and an image of a harmonious location in the surroundings of the sperm, individual houses, fences, gates, courtyard, Garden, garage, agricultural facilities, including, but not limited to, factors assay but an ‘intimacy’, ‘complexity’, ‘safety’, ‘activity’, ‘openness’ five factors, such as a description of the overall factors that force was 65.29%. This research seeks to determine the extent to which rurality of rural landscape Vista by location attributes and elements and representative officer in photo selection and rurality to extract the image. To date, followed by a comprehensive study, which was presented through the readjustment could not overlook the Visual elements. The future rural development officer for the evaluation of rural landscape classification and quantitative and objective assessment will have to come up with ways to do.
Abstract
Improve the rural views of the Government and the municipalities with the intention of rural landscape planning. However, rural scenery evaluation of landscape types and element categories, landscape scenes, such as the valuation of resources selected, form a coherent system and ecological point of view is not only a Visual perspective of evaluation, or evaluation is made. This study evaluates the rural landscape through the rural landscape for rurality is implemented can explain the image. Rural amenity 100 represented the rural landscape in rurality with photos of photos, and scenes, photos, location-based rural Vista rurality landscapes drawn components. Selected landscape photography scenic landscapes in the u.s. survey and image vocabularies through surveys is representative of the landscape in rurality of each Vista location-specific photos and images began extracted factors. As a result, the Distant view is a town and village in the rolling hills of the surrounding environment is an image behind the Vista Skyline, Farmland Rural village forests, Behind the hills, Individual housing roof, Housing arrangement, The number of household includes landscape components. Factor analysis ‘openness’, ‘intimacy’, ‘activity’, ‘complexity’, ‘safety’ was down to five factors, such as a description of the overall factors that force was 66.45 percent. Middle distance view is close to being out of town houses and village environment, an image in the skyline hills Vista, farmlands, village forests, rolling hills, behind the scenes of the housing component of the neck, the sperm will honor an individual factor analysis results are ‘intimacy’, ‘safety’, ‘openness’, ‘specificity’, ‘complexity’ five factors the whole description of the capacity factors compared to 67.24 percent. Close-range view is mainly in Vista village embraced the individual elements and an image of a harmonious location in the surroundings of the sperm, individual houses, fences, gates, courtyard, Garden, garage, agricultural facilities, including, but not limited to, factors assay but an ‘intimacy’, ‘complexity’, ‘safety’, ‘activity’, ‘openness’ five factors, such as a description of the overall factors that force was 65.29%. This research seeks to determine the extent to which rurality of rural landscape Vista by location attributes and elements and representative officer in photo selection and rurality to extract the image. To date, followed by a comprehensive study, which was presented through the readjustment could not overlook the Visual elements. The future rural development officer for the evaluation of rural landscape classification and quantitative and objective assessment will have to come up with ways to do.
참고문헌 (36)
- Arriaza; M, "Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes", Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, pp.115~125 (2004)
- 반영운, "가법형 통합지수 산정모형을 이용한 주관적 농촌경관 평가: 전북 고창선동권역을 대상으로", 농촌계획, 15(2), pp.27~42 (2009), 한국농촌계획학회
- 반영운, "경관영역 및 공간유형별 대표 경관형용사 선정", 한국도시지리학회지, 15(2), pp.95~101 (2012), 한국도시지리학회[DOI]
- 백종인, "공간유형별 농촌경관 평가 및 비교 분석- 전북 고창 선동권역의 주민과 방문객을 대상으로 -", 농촌계획, 16(4), pp.1~11 (2010), 한국농촌계획학회
- Choi, Eun Young, "Rural and Urban", ~ (2011)
- Feimer, N. R, "Personality and Environment Perception: Alternative Predictive Systems and Implications for Evaluative Judgements", 박사, pp.1979
- Im, Jae Hyun, "Study of Images of the Skyline Landscape by Type And Quantitative Analysis of Evaluation Factors", 석사, pp.2002
- Im, Seung Bin, "경관분석론" (1991), 서울대학교출판부
- Im, Seung Bin, "A Study on the Psychological Evaluation Indicators for the Landscape Impact Assessment", Architectural institute of korea, 12(5), pp.153~161 (1996)
- Joo, Shin Ha, "A Study on the selection and the application of landscape adjectives for the urban landscape analysis : Focused on the GwaCheon and Yaksoo district area", 박사, pp.2003
- Kang, Young Eun, "A study on the transitional characteristics of rural landscape in Korea", 박사, pp.2012
- 김충희, "농촌경관의 시각 정체성에 대한 연구- 도시와 농촌 거주자 지각 비교를 중심으로 -", 농촌계획, 16(4), pp.23~32 (2010), 한국농촌계획학회
- Kim, Chul Jae, "A Study on the Classification of the Natural Funeral Landscape Facilities and Its Visual Preference", 박사, pp.2011
- 김한수, "경관지수를 활용한 농촌마을 유형분류: 경관생태학적 접근", 농촌계획, 17(3), pp.1~13 (2011), 한국농촌계획학회
- Kim, Jung Sub, "Rural development and amenity:Discuss the trends and implications of international", Agroinfo Issue, 1~10 (2001)
- 김근성, "농촌마을 활성화를 위한 정주환경 계획에 관한 연구 - 양포마을 중심으로 -", 주거환경, 10(3), pp.47~59 (2012), 한국주거환경학회
- 김상범, "농촌경관계획을 위한 공간별 주요경관요소에 관한 연구 -농촌전통테마마을을 중심으로-", 농촌계획, 12(3), pp.13~18 (2006), 한국농촌계획학회
- 김용수, "도시근교 택지개발지역의 경관계획지표 적용방안", 농촌계획, 13(3), pp.51~60 (2007), 한국농촌계획학회
- Kim, Yu Mi, "(A) Study on the Eco-Geomorphological and Aesthetical Evaluation of Urban Stream Landscape", 석사, pp.2011
- 이동근, "농촌어메니티 자원에 기초한 농촌경관평가에 관한 연구", 농촌계획, 13(1), pp.11~17 (2007), 한국농촌계획학회
- 이정원, "농촌어메니티 자원의 농촌다움 특성평가에 관한 연구", 농촌계획, 12(2), pp.1~9 (2006), 한국농촌계획학회
- 임창수, "농촌마을 수준에서의 어메니티 강화 및 저해요소 항목체계 구축", 농촌계획, 12(4), pp.89~97 (2006), 한국농촌계획학회
- 임창수, "농촌마을 수준에서의 어메니티 강화 및 저해요소 평가등급 체계 구축", 농촌계획, 13(2), pp.27~38 (2007), 한국농촌계획학회
- Lim, Hyung Baek, "A Study on the Concept, the Origin and History, and Classification of Amenity", Korean J. of Ag Extension, 8(2), pp.191~199 (2001)
- Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, "농어촌경관계획 수립요령", ~ (2012)
- OECD, "Cultivating Rural Amenities: A Economic Development Perspective", OECD, ~ (1999)
- 박창석, "농촌어메니티에 기초한 농총자원 중요도 평가 및 순위적 관계 분석", 국토계획, 37(6), pp.21~35 (2002), 대한국토·도시계획학회
- 박창원, "농촌마을 개발방향 설정을 위한 자원 평가기법 연구", 농촌계획, 10(1), pp.9~17 (2004), 한국농촌계획학회
- Park, Cho Rong, "A study on image formation ofr urban and rural areas'residential scenery type", 석사, pp.2012
- 농어촌 경관의 실증적 연구를 통한 제도개선방안, "Presidential Commission on Architecture Policy", ~ (2012)
- 나정화, "비오톱 지도를 토대로 한 경관생태계획 모형개발과 적용- 대규모 택지개발 예정지를 대상으로 -", 농촌계획, 19(4), pp.17~32 (2013), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- 농촌계획수립을 위한 경관가치의 평가 및 활용방안 연구, "Rural Development Administration", ~ (2004)
- 농촌 어메니티 자원을 활용한 사례별 농촌마을 모형 설계, "Rural Development Administration", ~ (2005)
- 농촌경관지표, 농촌경관맵 및 경관보전협약의 현장적용성 연구, "Rural Development Administration", ~ (2007)
- Ryu, Ji Seon, "A Study on the extraction of vocabulary and image analysis for evaluating and rural landscape", 석사, pp.2012
- Suh, Joo Hwan, "Landscape Valuation by Fabricating Facotrs of Induction in Rural Landscape -The case of Rural Culture Village-,", Journal of the Korea Forest Recreation Welfare, 6(4), pp.1~7 (2002)