걷기를 적용한 경관의 주관적 인식조사 방법의 유용성에 관한 연구- 광주 수청리 농촌마을 대상으로 -
Walking as Research Method for Revealing Subjective Perceptions on Landscape : Rural Village Sucheong-ri, Gwangju
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In existing method, research for landscape resource is driven by professional (or with the participation of local people at Tokenism level), and usually hinder local residents from reflecting their appreciations on the landscape resources in their own ways and eventually ends up with indistinguishable landscape planning. To avoid this, a profound understanding of what landscape they experience in their daily life and how they perceive it should be empirically analysed carefully. The purpose of this study is to apply walking behavior as a method to examine local residents’ subjective perceptions and consider its usability. The researcher walked the site(Sucheongri) with the residents, carrying a GPS device, taking photographs of the landscape objects they described, and recording the relevant explanations. After gathering photographs and explanations which represent the research participants’ individual subjective perception, the researcher analysed the explanation using open coding, based on grounded theory. By the analysis, 117 landscape objectives are identified and 18 reason factors for landscape perception were deduced from the explanation. Those factors could be classified as ‘positive feeling inducing’ and ‘negative feeling inducing’, and also as ‘personal emotion based’ and ‘community based emotion’. By comparison between feeling map by conventional method and feeing map by new method, usability of new method was empirically reveled. Walking behavior makes it easier for researcher to get more abundant data in quantitative aspect and profound understanding with affection of respondent by allowing them to ‘go beyond’ the perceptions they remember. Finally new method with walking gives professionals a contextual understanding of a place and more resident-oriented plans and management on sites.
Abstract
In existing method, research for landscape resource is driven by professional (or with the participation of local people at Tokenism level), and usually hinder local residents from reflecting their appreciations on the landscape resources in their own ways and eventually ends up with indistinguishable landscape planning. To avoid this, a profound understanding of what landscape they experience in their daily life and how they perceive it should be empirically analysed carefully. The purpose of this study is to apply walking behavior as a method to examine local residents’ subjective perceptions and consider its usability. The researcher walked the site(Sucheongri) with the residents, carrying a GPS device, taking photographs of the landscape objects they described, and recording the relevant explanations. After gathering photographs and explanations which represent the research participants’ individual subjective perception, the researcher analysed the explanation using open coding, based on grounded theory. By the analysis, 117 landscape objectives are identified and 18 reason factors for landscape perception were deduced from the explanation. Those factors could be classified as ‘positive feeling inducing’ and ‘negative feeling inducing’, and also as ‘personal emotion based’ and ‘community based emotion’. By comparison between feeling map by conventional method and feeing map by new method, usability of new method was empirically reveled. Walking behavior makes it easier for researcher to get more abundant data in quantitative aspect and profound understanding with affection of respondent by allowing them to ‘go beyond’ the perceptions they remember. Finally new method with walking gives professionals a contextual understanding of a place and more resident-oriented plans and management on sites.
참고문헌 (37)
- Bunkse, E. V., "Humboldt and an aesthetic tradition in geography", Geographical Review, pp.127~146 (1981)
- Certeau, M., "The Practice of Everyday Life" (1988), University of California Press
- Corbin, J. M., "Grounded Theory Research : Procedures, Conons, and Evaluative Criteria", Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), pp.3~21 (1990)
- Cosgrove, D. E., "Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape" (1984), Univ of Wisconsin Press
- Cullen, G., "The Concise Townscape" (1961), The Architectural Press
- Downs, R. M., "Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior" (1973), Transaction Publishers
- Gatta, Federica, "Walking in the European City:Quotidian Mobility and Urban Ethnography", pp.245~262 (2014), Ashgate
- Gibson, J. J., "The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception" (2014), Psychology Press
- 한갑수, "천공사진(天空寫眞)을 이용한 도시경관의 분석 및 평가", 한국조경학회지, 33(4), pp.11~21 (2005), 한국조경학회
- Hwang, K. W., "A Study on the Green Mapping and Its Application in the Case of Seocho-Gu", Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 29(1), pp.113~123 (2001)
- 홍금수, "경관과 기억에 투영된 지역의 심층적 이해와 해석", 문화역사지리, 21(1), pp.46~94 (2009), 한국문화역사지리학회
- Jallouli, J., "An immersive path-based study of wind turbines' landscape: A French case in Plouguin", Renewable energy, 34, pp.597~607 (2009)
- Jeon, J. H., "Place and Landscape of the Local Elite in the Hoseo Region", Journal of cultural and historical geography, 16(3), pp.150~151 (2004)
- 주신하, "농촌경관의 보전‧형성‧관리를 위한 정책제안 연구", 농촌계획, 14(4), pp.77~86 (2008), 한국농촌계획학회
- 주신하, "국내 경관자원 조사 현황과 향후 과제", 한국조경학회지, 43(3), pp.27~42 (2015), 한국조경학회
- 정호현, "농촌경관자원 조사의 문제점 및 개선방안 연구- 2008 농촌어메니티 100선을 중심으로 -", 농촌계획, 16(4), pp.171~178 (2010), 한국농촌계획학회
- 강영은, "카드분류법을 통한 농촌관광자원 유형 분류-농촌어메니티자원 DB를 중심으로-", Journal of East Asian Landscape Studies, 6(2), pp.63~71 (2012), 부설 휴양및경관계획연구소
- 김미영, "‘오감(五感) 도시’를 위한 연구방법론으로서 걷기", 국토계획, 49(2), pp.5~21 (2014), 대한국토·도시계획학회
- Le Breton, D., "Eloge da la marche" (2000), Metailie
- 이인성, "가로경관 분석에서의 반구투영법의 효용성 검토", 한국조경학회지, 31(2), pp.58~69 (2003), 한국조경학회
- 이정원, "주민참여에 의한 농촌경관자원조사 방법 연구- 경관맵 사례 분석을 중심으로 -", 농촌계획, 16(4), pp.13~22 (2010), 한국농촌계획학회
- 이광윤, "유럽경관협약에 비추어 본 경관법의 현황과 쟁점", 법학연구, 30, pp.171~188 (2010), 부설법학연구소
- Lynch, K., "The image of the city" (1960), MIT press
- Morse, J. M., "Using grounded theory in nursing" (2003), HYUNMOON
- Nassauer, J. I., "Culture and changing landscape structure", Landscape ecology, 10(4), pp.229~237 (1995)
- Nicholas, E. J., "The Betweenness of Place:Towards a Geography of Modernity" (1991), Johns Hopkins University Press
- Passini, R., "Spatial representations: a wayfinding perspective", Environmental Psychology, 4(2), pp.153~164 (1984)
- Relph, E., "Place and placelessness" (1976), Pion London
- 서한림, "근린에서 이루어지는 주민 보행량 및 경로에 관한 실증연구 GPS를 활용한 서울 북촌의 30대, 40대 주부들의 실제 보행데이터를 기반으로", 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 27(09), pp.271~281 (2011), 대한건축학회
- 송나균, "공간구문론을 활용한 전통마을 여가공간의 보행동선 분석 - 외암민속마을을 사례로 -", 한국조경학회지, 37(1), pp.1~8 (2009), 한국조경학회
- Strauss, A. L., "Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory" (2001), HYUNMOON
- 성춘자, "경관에 투영된 장소정체성의 사회적 재구성과 의미- 일본 하코다테를 사례로 -", 한국사진지리학회지, 23(4), pp.253~269 (2013), 한국사진지리학회
- Tabayashi, A., "Commodification of rural space in Japan" (2015), Hanulmplus
- Tuan, Y. F., "Space and place : The perspective of experience" (1977), University of Minnesota Press
- Tuan, Y. F., "Rootedness and sense of place", Landscape, 24, pp.3~8 (1980)
- 양병일, "인간의 주관성에 근거한 지리적 사고의 분류 - 경관 및 발화사고법(think aloud method)을 활용한 실험을 통해 -", 사회과교육, 54(1), pp.31~46 (2015), 한국사회과교육연구학회
- A Study on the Preservation and Management of Rural Landscape for Enhancing Amenity, "Yoon, J. O.", Rural Research Institute, ~ (2005)