농촌 과소화 대응을 위한 마을 단위 농촌생활서비스 평가 모델의 개발 및 분석
Development and analysis of assessment model of a village-level rural living services for response to rural depopulation
2
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The degree of benefits of living services related to the quality of life can solve the depopulation problem, and it is necessary to be able to quantitatively analyze problems related to the quality of life in rural areas in order to cope with the rural depopulation. The purpose of this study was to develop the assessment model of a village-level rural living service that reflects the regional characteristics of rural villages to evaluate the level of rural living services for response rural depopulation. Based on the review of previous related studies, the evaluation index was composed of seven sectors of education, health, welfare, culture, environment, safety, and convenience, and the assessment model of a rural living service was established. This model was evaluated through a sample survey of 90 villages in Nonsan-si, Seongju-gun, and Pyeongchang-gun. As a result of the rural life services evaluation by Si and Gun, Seongju-gun, which is affected by nearby large cities, has the largest variation by village level and is assessed at a lower level overall than other Si and Gun. As a result of the rural life services evaluation by 7 sectors, in the case of health and welfare, low scores were shown in the assessment model, but the level of residents’ satisfaction was mid-level. In particular, in the case of Seongju-gun, there were significant differences in the assessment model and the survey results of the level of residents’ satisfaction in the health and welfare sectors due to the influence of nearby large cities. As a result of analyzing the number of villages corresponding to the top 30% and the bottom 30% of the evaluation results for each sector, it was analyzed that the villages with the highest evaluation results in Pyeongchang-gun in both the assessment model and the level of residents’ satisfaction. It implies that quantitative analysis of data based index and accessibility as well as level satisfaction of residents are necessary.
Abstract
The degree of benefits of living services related to the quality of life can solve the depopulation problem, and it is necessary to be able to quantitatively analyze problems related to the quality of life in rural areas in order to cope with the rural depopulation. The purpose of this study was to develop the assessment model of a village-level rural living service that reflects the regional characteristics of rural villages to evaluate the level of rural living services for response rural depopulation. Based on the review of previous related studies, the evaluation index was composed of seven sectors of education, health, welfare, culture, environment, safety, and convenience, and the assessment model of a rural living service was established. This model was evaluated through a sample survey of 90 villages in Nonsan-si, Seongju-gun, and Pyeongchang-gun. As a result of the rural life services evaluation by Si and Gun, Seongju-gun, which is affected by nearby large cities, has the largest variation by village level and is assessed at a lower level overall than other Si and Gun. As a result of the rural life services evaluation by 7 sectors, in the case of health and welfare, low scores were shown in the assessment model, but the level of residents’ satisfaction was mid-level. In particular, in the case of Seongju-gun, there were significant differences in the assessment model and the survey results of the level of residents’ satisfaction in the health and welfare sectors due to the influence of nearby large cities. As a result of analyzing the number of villages corresponding to the top 30% and the bottom 30% of the evaluation results for each sector, it was analyzed that the villages with the highest evaluation results in Pyeongchang-gun in both the assessment model and the level of residents’ satisfaction. It implies that quantitative analysis of data based index and accessibility as well as level satisfaction of residents are necessary.
참고문헌 (26)
- An, K. H., "Classification of regional types based on living service", Journal of National Policy Research, 4(3), pp.67~88 (2010)
- 배승종, "IPA 분석을 통한 농촌 복지·문화 서비스 및 인프라 수요 분석", 농촌계획, 25(1), pp.113~125 (2019), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- 배승종, "도시민 유입을 고려한 농촌 서비스 및 인프라 개선 주요 항목 도출- 복지문화 요인을 중심으로 -", 농촌계획, 26(2), pp.39~49 (2020), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- 배승종, "AHP 기법에 의한 농촌어메니티 가치 평가 모델 개발", 한국농공학회논문집, 49(5), pp.33~44 (2007), 한국농공학회
- 최윤지, "농촌 주민의 생활환경 및 사회서비스 만족도", 농촌지도와 개발, 17(4), pp.685~716 (2010), 한국농촌지도학회
- 한승석, "농촌생활서비스의 기능 및 서비스권역 분석: 충청남도 홍성군을 사례지역으로", 한국도시지리학회지, 23(3), pp.85~105 (2020), 한국도시지리학회[DOI]
- Jeon, J., "Accessibility to public service facilities in rural area by public transportation dystem", Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning, 22(4), pp.1~11 (2016)
- Kim, D. S., "Development of settlement environment diagnostic indices for rural village unit", Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning, 16(3), pp.27~41 (2010)
- Kim, J., "Rural standard services condition in rural fishing ara and the improvement of checking methods for implementation performance", Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning, 18(3), pp.91~101 (2012)
- Kim, J., "Rural jobs and the quality of life for residents", Monthly Public Policy, 149, pp.20~22 (2018)
- 김정태, "농촌지역의 생활환경 만족수준이 이주의사에 미치는 효과", 농촌계획, 24(4), pp.1~13 (2018), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- Kim, M. Y., "A study on improving the quality of life in rural areas: Based ono the rural service standards in England", Proceedings of the Korean Society of Community Living Science, 4, pp.181~192 (2018)
- 김수진, "농촌 복지․문화 서비스 및 인프라 진단체계 개발", 농촌계획, 25(1), pp.51~65 (2019), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- 김성록, "농촌중심지활성화사업의 변화와 실무적 개선방안", 법과정책연구, 17(4), pp.181~200 (2017), 한국법정책학회[DOI]
- Rural Living Service for Depopulation Evaluation Model Development (Ⅱ), "Korea Rural Community Corporation(KRCC)", 25~27 (2019)
- 이지민, "농촌고령화 위기 대응을 위한 지역특성 변화 분석지표 개발", 농촌계획, 18(4), pp.69~78 (2012), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- 이서구, "공공서비스가 삶의 질에 미치는 효과와 정책속성 - 농촌노인들의 삶의 질 평가를 중심으로 -", 농촌계획, 26(4), pp.93~105 (2020), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- Lim, C. R., "A study on the factors influencing the depopulation of rual villages", Journal of Agriculture & Life Science, 54(1), pp.109~116 (2020)
- Marino, F., "Why do some areas depopulate? The role of economic factors and local governments", Cities, 97, pp.102506~ (2020)
- 2017 Improvement of quality of life of farmers and fishermen and development plan of rural and rural areas Regional evaluation report (culture and leisure, health and welfare), "Ministry of Agricultural, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA)", Korea Rural Economic Institute (KREI), ~ (2018)
- "2019 Agricultural, Forestry and Fishery Survey Results" (2020)[URL]
- 모혜란, "농촌지역 진단지표 개발에 관한 연구", 대한토목학회논문집(국문), 34(6), pp.1925~1935 (2014), 대한토목학회[DOI]
- 박미정, "정주체계를 고려한 농촌마을의 정주여건 진단지표 개발", 농촌계획, 23(1), pp.65~83 (2017), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- The 3rd 5-year Basic Plan for Developing Rural Communities and Improving the Life Quality of Farmers and Fishermen, "Related Government Joint Ministries(RGJM)", 1~2 (2014)
- The Actual Situation and Policy Tasks of the Underdeveloped Villages in Rural and Fishing Villages, "Seong. J. I.", Korea Rural Economic Institute (KREI), 3~4 (2012)
- 신민지, "공익형 농촌 생활서비스 접근성 분석", 농촌계획, 25(3), pp.19~27 (2019), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]