본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

SMEs’ External Technology Collaboration Network Diversity and Productivity Improvement : The Moderating Effect of the Chief Technology Officer-Driven Technology Development

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산업공학

초록

Productivity improvement is one of the important goals which firms’ technology developments aim at. Firms’ improved productivity from technology development means that their inputs can produce more outputs through technology development, which makes firms’ productivity improvement from technology development more and more important in the age of technology advance and convergence like today. This research empirically analyzes the influence of the external technology collaboration network diversity on the productivity improvement of the small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) from technology development and the moderating effect of the chief technology officer (CTO)-driven technology development on this influence. This study constructs the research model reflecting the moderating impact of the CTO-driven technology development and tests it with the ordinary least squares regression through the IBM SPSS version 23 by using the 2,000 data about South Korean SMEs. This research empirically reveals two points. One is that SMEs’ external technology collaboration network diversity has a positive influence on their productivity improvement from technology development. The other is that the positive effect of SMEs’ external technology collaboration network diversity on their productivity improvement from technology development is moderated by the CTO-driven technology development. The two points revealed in this study present two meaningful implications in not only the practical but also academic point of view. The practical implication is that it is effective for SMEs to use CTOs in increasing their productivity improvement from technology development. The academic implication is that making technology collaboration with more diverse external partners can increase SMEs’ productivity improvement from technology development.

Abstract

Productivity improvement is one of the important goals which firms’ technology developments aim at. Firms’ improved productivity from technology development means that their inputs can produce more outputs through technology development, which makes firms’ productivity improvement from technology development more and more important in the age of technology advance and convergence like today. This research empirically analyzes the influence of the external technology collaboration network diversity on the productivity improvement of the small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) from technology development and the moderating effect of the chief technology officer (CTO)-driven technology development on this influence. This study constructs the research model reflecting the moderating impact of the CTO-driven technology development and tests it with the ordinary least squares regression through the IBM SPSS version 23 by using the 2,000 data about South Korean SMEs. This research empirically reveals two points. One is that SMEs’ external technology collaboration network diversity has a positive influence on their productivity improvement from technology development. The other is that the positive effect of SMEs’ external technology collaboration network diversity on their productivity improvement from technology development is moderated by the CTO-driven technology development. The two points revealed in this study present two meaningful implications in not only the practical but also academic point of view. The practical implication is that it is effective for SMEs to use CTOs in increasing their productivity improvement from technology development. The academic implication is that making technology collaboration with more diverse external partners can increase SMEs’ productivity improvement from technology development.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Adler, P.S., "The Chief Technology Officer", California Management Review, 32(3), pp.55~62 (1990)
  2. Afuah, A., "Innovation Management" (2003), Oxford Press
  3. Akhilesh, K. B., "R&D Management" (2014), Springer
  4. Betz, S., "Managing Technological Innovation : Competitive Advantage from Change" (2011), John Wiley & Sons
  5. Chesbrough, H. W., "Open Innovation-The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology" (2006), Harvard Business School Press
  6. Chesbrough, H. W., "Open Service Innovation-Rethinking Your Business to Grow and Compete in a New Era" (2011), Jossey-Base
  7. Chesbrough, H. W., "The Era of Open Innovation", MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), pp.35~41 (2003)
  8. Coelli, T. J., "An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis" (2005), Springer
  9. Product Innovation and Technology Strategy, "Cooper, R.G.", Product Development Institute Inc, ~ (2009)
  10. Deeds, D., "Honeymoons and Liabilities : The Relationship between Age and Performance in Research and Development Alliances", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(6), pp.468~484 (2003)
  11. Hagedoorn, J., "Inter-firm R&D Partnerships : An Overview of Major Trends and Patterns since 1960", Research Policy, 31(4), pp.477~492 (2002)
  12. 허용석, "An empirical analysis of the influence of external knowledge network on SMEs’ new technology development and technology commercialization capabilities in the perspective of open innovation", 디지털융복합연구, 14(5), pp.149~156 (2016), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
  13. 허용석, "IT SME Ventures’ External Information Network Diversity and Productivity Improvement : The Mediating Role of the Production Period Reduction", 산업경영시스템학회지, 40(1), pp.144~149 (2017), 한국산업경영시스템학회
  14. Shane, S. A., "Technology Strategy for Managers and Entrepreneurs" (2014), Pearson
  15. 송광석, "부트스트랩 맘퀴스트 생산성지수를 이용한 Single PPM 인증기업의 생산성 비교 연구", 품질경영학회지, 38(2), pp.261~275 (2010), 한국품질경영학회
  16. Stevenson, W.J., "Operations Management" (2014), McGraw-Hill
  17. Trott, P., "Innovation Management and New Product Development" (2012), Prentice Hall
  18. Tsai, K., "Collaborative Networks and Product Innovation Performance : Toward a Contingency Perspective", Research Policy, 38(5), pp.765~778 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)