본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

첨단산업기술(6T) 연구개발사업의 효율성 분석:2단계 네트워크 DEA 접근의 적용

Analyzing the Efficiency of National 6T R&D Projects by Two-stage Network DEA Approach

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산업공학

초록

Scientific and technological performances (e.g., patents and publications) made through R&D play a pivotal role for national economic growth. National governments encourage academia-industry cooperation and thereby pursue continuous development of science technology and innovation. Increasing R&D-related investments and manpower are crucial for national industrial development, but evidence of poor performance in business performance, efficiency, and effectiveness has recently been found in Korea. This study evaluates performance efficiency of the 6T sector (Information Technology, Bio Technology, Nano Technology, Space Technology, Environment Technology, Culture Technology), which is considered a high-potential promising industry for the next generation growth and currently occupies two thirds of the national R&D projects. The study measures the relative efficiency of R&D in a comparative perspective by employing the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method. The result reveals overall low efficiency in basic R&D (0.2112), applied R&D (0.2083), development R&D (0.2638), and others (0.0641), confirming that economic performance and efficiency were relatively poor compared to production efficiency. Efficient R&D needs policy makers to create strategies that can increase overall efficiency by improving productivity performance and quality while increasing economic performance.

Abstract

Scientific and technological performances (e.g., patents and publications) made through R&D play a pivotal role for national economic growth. National governments encourage academia-industry cooperation and thereby pursue continuous development of science technology and innovation. Increasing R&D-related investments and manpower are crucial for national industrial development, but evidence of poor performance in business performance, efficiency, and effectiveness has recently been found in Korea. This study evaluates performance efficiency of the 6T sector (Information Technology, Bio Technology, Nano Technology, Space Technology, Environment Technology, Culture Technology), which is considered a high-potential promising industry for the next generation growth and currently occupies two thirds of the national R&D projects. The study measures the relative efficiency of R&D in a comparative perspective by employing the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method. The result reveals overall low efficiency in basic R&D (0.2112), applied R&D (0.2083), development R&D (0.2638), and others (0.0641), confirming that economic performance and efficiency were relatively poor compared to production efficiency. Efficient R&D needs policy makers to create strategies that can increase overall efficiency by improving productivity performance and quality while increasing economic performance.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Banker, R. D., "Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis", Management Science, 30(9), pp.1078~1092 (1984)
  2. Banker, R. D., "Returns to scale in different DEA models", European Journal of Operational Research, 154(2), pp.345~362 (2004)
  3. Boussofiane, A., "Applied data envelopment analysis", European Journal of Operational Research, 52(1), pp.1~15 (1991)
  4. Brown, M. G., "Measuring r&d productivity", Research-Technology Management, 31(4), pp.11~15 (1988)
  5. 변상규, "국가 R&D 사업 효율성 연구 : 신성장동력핵심기술개발사업을 중심으로", 과학기술법연구, 15(2), pp.179~206 (2009), 과학기술법연구원[DOI]
  6. Charnes, A., "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units", European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), pp.429~444 (1978)
  7. Cohen, W.M., "Innovation and learning:the two faces of R&D", The Economic Journal, 99(397), pp.569~596 (1989)
  8. Cook, W.D., "Data envelopment analysis: A handbook of modeling internal structure and network" (2014), Springer
  9. Cook, W. D., "Network DEA:Additive efficiency decomposition", European Journal of Operational Research, 207(2), pp.1122~1129 (2010)
  10. Cullmann, A., "R&D efficiency and barriers to entry: a two stage semi-parametric DEA approach", Oxford Economic Papers, 64(1), pp.176~196 (2012)
  11. Dyson, R. G., "Pitfalls and protocols in DEA", European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), pp.245~259 (2001)
  12. Emrouznejad, A., "A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016", Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 61, pp.4~8 (2018)
  13. Farrell, M. J., "The measurement of productive efficiency", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 120(3), pp.253~281 (1957)
  14. Ferretti, F., "Research excellence indicators: time to reimagine the ‘making of’?,", Science and Public Policy, 45(5), pp.731~741 (2018)
  15. FItzsimmons, J.A., "Service management for competitive advantage" (1994), McGraw Hill
  16. Freeman, C., "Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: What we can learn from the past", Research Policy, 38(4), pp.583~589 (2009)
  17. Golany, B., "An application procedure for DEA", Omega, 17(3), pp.237~250 (1989)
  18. Halaskova, M., "Research and development efficiency in public and private sectors:An empirical analysis of EU countries by using DEA methodology", Sustainability, 12(17), pp.7050~ (2020)
  19. 홍형득, "연구관리기관의 역량이 성과에 미치는 영향 분석", 기술혁신학회지, 21(2), pp.788~817 (2018), 한국기술혁신학회
  20. Hong, S. G., "A Study on R&D investment flows between industrial sector and analysis of the effects on the increase of direct and indirect Productivity" (1991), Science and Technology Policy Institute
  21. Hsu, F.M., "Measuring relative efficiency of government-sponsored R&D projects: A three-stage approach", Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(2), pp.178~186 (2009)
  22. Hwang, S. W., "Efficiency of national R&D investment" (2009), Science and Technology Policy Institute
  23. Jiang, B., "The uncertain two-stage network DEA models", Soft Computing, 25(1), pp.421~429 (2021)
  24. Jiménez-Sáez, F., "Evaluating research efficiency within National R&D Programmes", Research Policy, 40(2), pp.230~241 (2011)
  25. Kao, C., "Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan", European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1), pp.418~429 (2008)
  26. 길종백, "정부출연연의 대리문제와 PBS의 한계", 한국조직학회보, 6(2), pp.179~202 (2009), 한국조직학회[DOI]
  27. 김태희, "국가연구개발사업을 통한 국제공동연구 성과 제고 방안에 대한 연구 : 기초 및 원천분야를 중심으로", 기술혁신학회지, 15(2), pp.400~420 (2012), 한국기술혁신학회[DOI]
  28. 김영훈, "우리나라의 R&D 생산성 및 효율성분석 : OECD 국가와의 비교를 중심으로", 기술혁신연구, 19(1), pp.1~28 (2011), 기술경영경제학회
  29. Lee, H., "R&D performance monitoring, evaluation, and management system:A model and methods", International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 8(2), pp.295~313 (2011)
  30. Lee, H., "Comparative evaluation of performance of national R&D programs with heterogeneous objectives: A DEA approach", European Journal of Operational Research, 196(3), pp.847~855 (2009)
  31. 이학연, "An International Comparison of R&D Efficiency : DEA Approach", 기술혁신연구, 13(2), pp.207~222 (2005), 기술경영경제학회
  32. Lee, K. J., "A Study on the Analysis of Major S&T Issues and Deduction of Policy Direction" (2009), Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning
  33. Lee, W. S., "Development of Korean R&D-based Macroeconomic Model and CGE Model" (2012), Science and Technology Policy Institute
  34. Liang, L., "DEA models for twostage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition", Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 55(7), pp.643~653 (2008)
  35. Liang, L., "DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation", Annals of Operations Research, 145(1), pp.35~49 (2006)
  36. 남현동, "OECD 국가 R&D 투자의 효율성: 측정과 제언", 한국생산관리학회지, 31(3), pp.249~273 (2020), 한국생산관리학회
  37. Odagiri, H., "Private and quasi-social rates of return on pharmaceutical R&D in Japan", Research Policy, 21(4), pp.335~345 (1992)
  38. 박창일, "6T 분야별 국가 R&D사업의 효율성과 생산성변화", 산업경제연구, 31(1), pp.293~325 (2018), 한국산업경제학회[DOI]
  39. Measuring the “ideas” production function: Evidence from international patent output, "Porter, M.E.", NBER, w7891~ (2000)
  40. Rhim, H. S., "DEA", AHP Hybrid Model for Evaluation & Selection of R & D Projects, 1999, pp.24(4), 1~12
  41. Rogers, S., "Performance management in local government" (1990), Longman
  42. Wang, E.C., "Relative efficiency of R&D activities: A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach", Research Policy, 36(2), pp.260~273 (2007)
  43. Wang, E. C., "R&D efficiency and economic performance:A cross-country analysis using the stochastic frontier approach", Journal of Policy Modeling, 29(2), pp.345~360 (2007)
  44. 유석천, "2단계 네트워크 DEA를 이용한 세계 주요 공항 성과 분석", 품질경영학회지, 45(1), pp.65~92 (2017), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
  45. Zhu, J., "Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets" (2014), Springer

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)