경기순환주기 소비위험과 한국 주식 수익률 횡단면
Business Cycle Consumption Risk and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns in Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Using the frequency-based decomposition, I decompose the consumption growth to explain well-known patterns of stock returns in the Korean market. To be more specific, the consumption growth is decomposed by its half-life of shocks. The component over four years of half-life is called the business-cycle consumption component, and the components with half-lives under four years are short-run components. I compute the long-run and short-run components of stock excess returns as well and use component- by-component sensitivities to price stock portfolios. As a result, the business-cycle consumption risk with half-life of over four years is useful in explaining the cross-section of size-book-to-market portfolios and size-momentum portfolios in the Korean stock market. The short-run components have their own pricing abilities with mixed direction, so that the restricted one short-term factor model is rejected. The explanatory power with short- and long-run components is comparable to that of the Fama-French three-factor model. The components with one- to four-year half-lives are also helpful in explaining the returns. The results about the long-run components emphasize the importance of long-run component in consumption growth to explain the asset returns.
Abstract
Using the frequency-based decomposition, I decompose the consumption growth to explain well-known patterns of stock returns in the Korean market. To be more specific, the consumption growth is decomposed by its half-life of shocks. The component over four years of half-life is called the business-cycle consumption component, and the components with half-lives under four years are short-run components. I compute the long-run and short-run components of stock excess returns as well and use component- by-component sensitivities to price stock portfolios. As a result, the business-cycle consumption risk with half-life of over four years is useful in explaining the cross-section of size-book-to-market portfolios and size-momentum portfolios in the Korean stock market. The short-run components have their own pricing abilities with mixed direction, so that the restricted one short-term factor model is rejected. The explanatory power with short- and long-run components is comparable to that of the Fama-French three-factor model. The components with one- to four-year half-lives are also helpful in explaining the returns. The results about the long-run components emphasize the importance of long-run component in consumption growth to explain the asset returns.
참고문헌 (22)
- Bandi, F. M., "Spectral factor models", Journal of Financial Economics, 142(1), pp.214~238 (2021)
- Business-cycle consumption risk and asset prices, "Bandi, F. M.", Rutgers University, ~ (2021)
- Horizon-specific macroeconomic risks and the cross-section of expected returns, "Boons, M.", Rutgers University, ~ (2021)
- Bansal, R., "Risks for the long run : A potential resolution of asset pricing puzzles", Journal of Finance, 59(4), pp.1481~1509 (2004)
- Campbell, J. Y., "By force of habit : A consumption-based explanation of aggregate stock market behavior", Journal of Political Economy, 107(2), pp.205~251 (1999)
- Cochrane, J. H., "Asset pricing" (2005), Princeton university press
- Fama, E, F., "Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds", Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), pp.3~56 (1993)
- Fama, E. F., "and equilibrium : Empirical tests", Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), pp.607~636 (1973)
- Grammig, J., "Long-horizon consumption risk and the cross-section of returns:New tests and international evidence", European Journal of Finance, 15(5-6), pp.511~532 (2009)
- 한재훈, "Discretionary Consumption and the Equity Premium: Evidence from Korea", 재무연구, 30(2), pp.217~236 (2017), 한국재무학회[DOI]
- Hansen, L. P., "Consumption strikes back? Measuring long-run risk", Journal of Political Economy, 116(2), pp.260~302 (2008)
- Jagannathan, R., "Lazy investors, discretionary consumption, and the cross-section of stock returns", Journal of Finance, 62(4), pp.1623~1661 (2007)
- 장지원, "주가 모멘텀 이상현상의 재검토", 재무연구, 30(3), pp.317~359 (2017), 한국재무학회[DOI]
- Jegadeesh, N., "Returns to buying winners and selling losers: implications for stock market efficiency", Journal of Finance, 48(1), pp.65~91 (1993)
- Kim, S., "Evaluating asset pricing models in the Korean stock market", Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 20(2), pp.198~227 (2012)
- 이창준, "경제상황에 따른 기업규모효과, 가치효과, 모멘텀효과", 재무관리연구, 32(2), pp.201~234 (2015), 한국재무관리학회[DOI]
- Lewellen, J., "A skeptical appraisal of asset pricing tests", Journal of Financial Economics, 96(2), pp.175~194 (2010)
- Novy-Marx, R., "Is momentum really momentum?", Journal of Financial Economics, 103(3), pp.429~453 (2012)
- Ortu, F., "Long-run risk and the persistence of consumption shocks", Review of Financial Studies, 26(11), pp.2876~2915 (2013)
- 박도준, "소비관련 거시변수를 사용한 조건부 자산가격모형의 설명력에 관한 연구", 한국증권학회지, 50(3), pp.339~367 (2021), 한국증권학회
- Parker, J. A., "Consumption risk and the cross section of expected returns", Journal of Political Economy, 113(1), pp.185~222 (2005)
- 손삼호, "한국 주식시장에서 장기소비위험 모형의 유효성과 경기변동에 대한 시사점", 선물연구, 20(3), pp.265~295 (2012), 한국파생상품학회