자연체험 및 휴양적 관점에서 농촌지역의 비오톱 가치평가 연구 - 대규모 택지개발 사업지를 대상으로 -
A Study on the Evaluation of Biotope Value of Rural Areas in terms of Nature Experience and Recreation - A Case Study of Large Residential Land Development District -
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research has a significance on providing basic material of landscape ecological planning and open space planning of the future site by selecting Sinseo innovative city area, large residential land development district in rural area, by classifying biotope types and implementing recreational value assessment in the level of area. First of all, as a result of classification of biotope types in research site, total 11 biotope type groups including stream biotope and its subordinate 51 biotope types. Also, as a result of the first value assessment of classified biotopes, there are total 5 types such as vegetation-full natural river, fallow ground in I grade. In addition, it is analyzed that grade II have 18 types, III are 10, IV are 12, the least valuable V are 6. Especially, grassland biotope(GD) was classified into grade II, which is one grade raised, because it is analyzed that it has high value in terms of normal access and availability although it was assessed as grade III in terms of natural experience quality. Lastly, as a result of the second assessment, special areas for natural experience and recreation(1a, 1b) are 15, areas for natural experience and recreation(2a, 2b, 2c) are 47. Especially, the 52th drawing mark space was grade II in the first assessment but its value grade was upgraded because of its high value in terms of use evidence, size of the area, accessibility with housing area, history and cultural character and so on.
Abstract
This research has a significance on providing basic material of landscape ecological planning and open space planning of the future site by selecting Sinseo innovative city area, large residential land development district in rural area, by classifying biotope types and implementing recreational value assessment in the level of area. First of all, as a result of classification of biotope types in research site, total 11 biotope type groups including stream biotope and its subordinate 51 biotope types. Also, as a result of the first value assessment of classified biotopes, there are total 5 types such as vegetation-full natural river, fallow ground in I grade. In addition, it is analyzed that grade II have 18 types, III are 10, IV are 12, the least valuable V are 6. Especially, grassland biotope(GD) was classified into grade II, which is one grade raised, because it is analyzed that it has high value in terms of normal access and availability although it was assessed as grade III in terms of natural experience quality. Lastly, as a result of the second assessment, special areas for natural experience and recreation(1a, 1b) are 15, areas for natural experience and recreation(2a, 2b, 2c) are 47. Especially, the 52th drawing mark space was grade II in the first assessment but its value grade was upgraded because of its high value in terms of use evidence, size of the area, accessibility with housing area, history and cultural character and so on.
참고문헌 (36)
- 도시공원 및 녹지 등에 관한 법률, "국토해양부", ~ (2008)
- 김귀곤, "생태공원조성을 위한 식재설계방법의 개발-시각적 선호도와 생태적 다양성의 상호관련성을 중심으로-", 한국조경학회지, 27(5), pp.12~24 (2000)
- 김수봉, "대도시 공원녹지의 역할에 관한 연구 (Ⅰ)-대구시민의 공원녹지의 가치 분석을 중심으로-", 한국조경학회지, 19(4), pp.1~11 (1992)
- 나정화, "자연체험 및 휴양기능을 중심으로 한 도시 밀집지역 비오톱 평가", 한국조경학회지, 31(1), pp.42~53 (2003), 한국조경학회
- 나정화, "도시 비오톱의 자연체험의 가치 평가모형의 개발과 적용", 한국조경학회지, 30(3), pp.1~11 (2002), 한국조경학회
- 나정화, "대도시의 비오톱 구조분석-자연체험 및 휴양의 관점에서-", 한국조경학회지, 28(3), pp.72~87 (2000)
- 나정화, "생물종 및 서식지 보전의 관점에서 본 대도시의 비오톱 구조분석-대구광역시 수성구를 중심으로-", 한국조경학회지, 28(6), pp.32~42 (2001)
- 도후조, "도시밀집지역의 비오톱 구조분석-대구광역시 중구를 중심으로-", 석사, 조경학과, pp.2001
- 류남형, "보행자세해석에 의한 경사로의 보행성", 한국조경학회지, 23(2), pp.157~166 (1995)
- 류연수, "도시비오톱의 평가지표 설정", 석사, 조경학과, pp.2000
- 박원규(호남대), "지속가능한 주거단지 계획모형 개발", 한국조경학회지, 30(5), pp.39~54 (2002), 한국조경학회
- 서울특별시, "도시생태현황도 정비", pp.165~173 (2005)
- 송지선, "서울시 공원 내 자연학습장 현황 분석과 개선방안", 한국조경학회지, 31(6), pp.41~52 (2004), 한국조경학회
- 성현찬, "쾌적환경평가 및 지표개발에 관한 연구", 한국조경학회지, 24(4), pp.24~38 (1997)
- 낙동강 70리 생태공원조성 기본계획, "안동시", 3~326 (2004)
- 안봉원, "도시근교림의 Recreation 기능제고를 위한 기초연구-이용행태를 중심으로-", 한국조경학회지, 10(1), pp.9~20 (1882)
- 연평식, "산림휴양으로부터 얻는 편익의 규명", 산림휴양학회지, 7(2), pp.27~36 (2003)
- 애플밸리 조성사업 기본계획 수립, "예천군", 3~228 (2005)
- 이석철, "도시비오톱에 대한 구조분석 및 수치지도화-대구광역시 수성구를 중심으로-", 석사, 조경학과, pp.1999
- 이현택, "고속도로 사면의수경처리에 관한 연구", 한국조경학회지, 24(2), pp.1~12 (1996)
- 임승빈, "경관분석 및 평가방법에 관한 연구-현상학적 접근-", 한국조경학회지, 16(1), pp.43~51 (1988)
- 전경수, "자연휴양림의 이용특성 및 방문동기에 관한 연구", 한국조경학회지, 24(2), pp.44~51 (1996)
- 조창우, "택지개발사업지구내 근린공원의 입지유형별 개발실태분석", 석사, pp.2003
- 주신하, "현대 대표 도시공원에 대한 평가 - 만족도 및 경관이미지 특성을 중심으로 -", 한국조경학회지, 36(4), pp.36~47 (2008), 한국조경학회
- 대구 신서 생태환경계획 수립, "한국토지공사", 101~211 (2007)
- 비오톱 유형별 보전 및 복원기법 개발. 차세대 핵심환경기술개발사업 1차년도 보고서, "환경부", 88~96 (2008)
- Bauer. G., "Landschftsrahmenplan Erholungspark Ville", Beitraege zur Landesentwicklung, 35, pp.149~173 (1976)
- Blume, H. P., "Ökologische bedeutung anthropogener bodenveraenderungen", Vegetationskunde, 10, pp.75~85 (1976)
- Forman, R. T. T., "Estimate of the area affected ecologically by the road system in the United", Conservation Biology, 14, pp.31~35 (2000)
- Entscheidungshilfen fuer die Freiraumplanung, "Garbrecht, D.", 307~312, pp.ILS Band 2.026 (1980)
- Goossen, M., "Assessing quality of rural areas in the Netherlands: Finding the most Important Indicators for Recreation", Landscape and Urban Planning, 46, pp.241~251 (2000)
- Jim, C. Y., "Recreation- amenity Use and Contingent Valuation of Urban Greenspaces in Guangzhou, China", Landscape and Urban Planning, 75, pp.81~96 (2006)
- Kaerkes, W., "Zur oekologischen Bedeutung urbaner Freiflaechen", 석사, pp.1986
- Kiemstedt, H., "Landschaftsbewertung fuer Erholung im Sauerland", pp.40~72 (1975), Dortmund
- Meohoden Oekologischer Planug im Kommunalen Umweltschutz am Beispiel der Stdt Doetmund, "Marks, R.", 589~592, pp.VGFO Band 18 (1989)
- Sukopp, H., "Der Einfluss des Menschen auf die Vegetation", Vegetation, 17, pp.363~369 (1969)