Effect of kinetic energy on dynamic behavior of Nanoclay/Epoxy nanocomposites
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The dynamic behavior of nanocomposites, owing to variations in impact velocity, was investigated in this study. Young’s modulus was modified using the modified rule of mixture to obtain transverse properties of the nanocomposites, which were more accurate than that of the rule-of-mixture composites. Combinations for four kinetic energies of 0.051, 0.204, 0.817, and 1.84 J, which corresponded to impact velocities of 5, 10, 20, and 30 m/s, respectively, were considered. The nanocomposites were composed of 20 layers positioned at [0/45/0/-45/0]2S with a nanoclay content of 5 wt.% NC. It was found that as the kinetic energy increased, the maximum contact force and deflection increased, and the contact duration decreased. Generally, for variables of geometry change, the contact force and deflection tended to be opposite for most dynamic responses, but the two relationships tended to be similar for the kinetic energy variables. In other words, as the kinetic energy increased, the contact force, plate deflection, rebound energy, and absorbed energy increased, whereas the coefficient of restitution decreased.
Abstract
The dynamic behavior of nanocomposites, owing to variations in impact velocity, was investigated in this study. Young’s modulus was modified using the modified rule of mixture to obtain transverse properties of the nanocomposites, which were more accurate than that of the rule-of-mixture composites. Combinations for four kinetic energies of 0.051, 0.204, 0.817, and 1.84 J, which corresponded to impact velocities of 5, 10, 20, and 30 m/s, respectively, were considered. The nanocomposites were composed of 20 layers positioned at [0/45/0/-45/0]2S with a nanoclay content of 5 wt.% NC. It was found that as the kinetic energy increased, the maximum contact force and deflection increased, and the contact duration decreased. Generally, for variables of geometry change, the contact force and deflection tended to be opposite for most dynamic responses, but the two relationships tended to be similar for the kinetic energy variables. In other words, as the kinetic energy increased, the contact force, plate deflection, rebound energy, and absorbed energy increased, whereas the coefficient of restitution decreased.
참고문헌 (11)
- J. Wuite, "Deflection and stress behaviour of nanocomposite reinforced beams using a multiscale analysis", Composite Structures, 71(3-4), pp.388~396 (2005)
- M. H. Meybodi, "Low-velocity impact response of a nanocomposite beam using an analytical model", Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 12(2), pp.333~354 (2015)
- P. R. S. Reddy, "Influence of nanoclay and incident energy on impact resistance of S2-glass", epoxy composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact, 2016, pp.8, 174~179
- J. N. Reddy, "A simple higher-order theory for laminated composite plate", Journal of Applied Mechanics(ASME), 51(4), pp.745~752 (1984)
- J. M. Whitney, "Shear deformation in heterogeneous anisotropic plates", Journal of Applied Mechanics, 37(4), pp.1031~1036 (1970)
- H. D. Kang, "A study on the dynamic behaviour of the coating tempered glass plate under impact", International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development (IJMPERD), 8(6), pp.193~200 (2018)
- K. C. Ahn, "A comparative study on the impact behaviour of the coated glass plates by FSDT and HSDT", International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development (IJMPERD), 8(6), pp.479~486 (2018)
- M. Chan, "Mechanism of reinforcement in a nanoclay", polymer composite, 2011, pp.42(6), 1708~1712
- L. P. Kollar, "Mechanics of Composite Structures" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- R. Olsson, "Closed form prediction of peak load and delamination onset under small mass impact", Composite Structures, 59(3), pp.341~349 (2003)
- R. Olsson, "Analytical model for delamination growth during small mass impact on plates", International Journal of Solids and Structures, 47(21), pp.2884~2892 (2010)