본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

AHP를 활용한 편의점 서비스 편의성의 상대적 중요도 연구 : 경영자와 소비자 간의 Gap Analysis

A Study on Relative Importance of Service Convenience in the Convenience Store Using AHP : Gap Analysis between Consumers and Store Owners

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산업공학

초록

[Purpose] It aims to suggest the differential factors to enhance the customer satisfaction and to activate the shopping in the convenience store (CVS). [Methodology] Convenience store service convenience (CVS SERVCON) was developed at the first time and the gap of relative importance level between the owners and the consumers was assessed by AHP analysis method..[Findings] First, the importance of access convenience was assessed as the first priority in both CVS owners’ group and the consumers’ group, while the detailed elements showed the differences which required the improvements. Based on the consumers’ assessment, the importance of location was relatively low. They assessed relatively high on 24 hours operation of CVS and personal services. Second with respect to the transaction convenience, CVS owners’ group rated it as the fourth priority while the consumers’ group rated as the second, which requires the improvement. Third in terms of benefit utility and value-added service of post-benefit convenience which are the sub-factors of benefit convenience, the rate on the importance from the consumers showed higher than that from the owners, which requires the improvement. [Implications] Based on this study results, CVS operating companies are anticipated to be able to satisfy the customers, moreover, to secure the loyal customers if they concentrate the resources to develop the differentiation strategy on the areas where the consumers’ demands are high while performs the maintenance strategy on the areas where their demands are low. In addition, this study contributed the theoretical expansion of SERVCON upon development of CVS SERVCON to comply with its definition.

Abstract

[Purpose] It aims to suggest the differential factors to enhance the customer satisfaction and to activate the shopping in the convenience store (CVS). [Methodology] Convenience store service convenience (CVS SERVCON) was developed at the first time and the gap of relative importance level between the owners and the consumers was assessed by AHP analysis method..[Findings] First, the importance of access convenience was assessed as the first priority in both CVS owners’ group and the consumers’ group, while the detailed elements showed the differences which required the improvements. Based on the consumers’ assessment, the importance of location was relatively low. They assessed relatively high on 24 hours operation of CVS and personal services. Second with respect to the transaction convenience, CVS owners’ group rated it as the fourth priority while the consumers’ group rated as the second, which requires the improvement. Third in terms of benefit utility and value-added service of post-benefit convenience which are the sub-factors of benefit convenience, the rate on the importance from the consumers showed higher than that from the owners, which requires the improvement. [Implications] Based on this study results, CVS operating companies are anticipated to be able to satisfy the customers, moreover, to secure the loyal customers if they concentrate the resources to develop the differentiation strategy on the areas where the consumers’ demands are high while performs the maintenance strategy on the areas where their demands are low. In addition, this study contributed the theoretical expansion of SERVCON upon development of CVS SERVCON to comply with its definition.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Aagja, J. P., "Validating service convenience scale and profiling customers : A study in the Indian retail context", Vikalpa, 36(4), pp.25~50 (2011)
  2. Anderson, E. W., "Repositioning for changing preferences : The case of beef versus poultry", Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), pp.219~232 (1991)
  3. Berry, L. L., "Revisiting"big ideas in services marketing"30 years later", Journal of Services Marketing, 30(1), pp.3~6 (2016)
  4. Berry, L. L., "Understanding service convenience", Journal of Marketing, 66(3), pp.1~17 (2002)
  5. 부제만, "다표본 처리를 위한 새로운 AHP 활용 방안에 관한 연구", 경영컨설팅연구, 16(2), pp.191~198 (2016), 한국경영컨설팅학회
  6. Brown, L. G., "Convenience in services marketing", Journal of Services Marketing, 4(1), pp.53~59 (1990)
  7. The customer may not always be right : Customer compatibility and service performance, "Buell, R. W.", Harvard Business School, ~, pp.Harvard Business School Working paper 16-091 (2018)
  8. Chang, Y. W., "The influence of multiple types of service convenience on behavioral intentions : The mediating role of consumer satisfaction in a Taiwanese leisure setting", International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(1), pp.107~118 (2012)
  9. Colwell, S. R., "Toward a measure of service convenience : multiple-item scale development and empirical test", Journal of Services Marketing, 22(2), pp.160~169 (2008)
  10. Dabholkar, P. A., "A measure of service quality for retail stores : scale development and validation", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(1), pp.3~ (1996)
  11. Elizabeth Lloyd, A., "Time buying and time saving : effects on service convenience and the shopping experience at the mall", Journal of services Marketing, 28(1), pp.36~49 (2014)
  12. Forman, E. H., "Decision by objectives :how to convince others that you are right" (2001), World Scientific
  13. Gross, B. L., "Time-oriented advertising :a content analysis of United States magazine advertising, 1890-1988", The Journal of Marketing, 53(4), pp.76~83 (1989)
  14. 한상린, "B2B 시장에서의 서비스 편의성이 관계성과에 미치는 영향 : 관계적 요인의 매개효과 분석", 유통연구, 16(4), pp.65~93 (2011), 한국유통학회
  15. 홍미숙, "편의점 도시락 이용고객의 선택속성이 긍정적인 소비감정 및 충성도에 미치는 영향", 한국외식산업학회지, 13(2), pp.29~44 (2017), 한국외식산업학회[DOI]
  16. 강명주, "편의점의 서비스편의품질 측정도구 개발", Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 7(3), pp.1043~1064 (2005), 한국자료분석학회
  17. Kaura, V., "Antecedents of customer satisfaction : a study of Indian public and private sector banks", International Journal of Bank Marketing, 31(3), pp.167~186 (2013)
  18. Keh, H. T., "Customer reactions to service separation", Journal of Marketing, 74(2), pp.55~70 (2010)
  19. Kelley, E. J., "The importance of convenience in consumer purchasing", The Journal of Marketing, 23(1), pp.32~38 (1958)
  20. 김도우, "AHP를 활용한 편의점 방범인증제 개선방안", 환경디자인과 안전, 5(2), pp.7~35 (2014), 한국셉테드학회
  21. 김주홍, "AHP를 이용한 물류서비스품질 선택요인의 상대적 중요도에 관한 연구: 물류기업과 고객 간의 비교를 중심으로", 경영교육연구, 33(2), pp.297~327 (2018), 한국경영교육학회[DOI]
  22. 김미정, "소매업태의 지각된 서비스 편의성이 서비스 성과에 미치는 영향: 백화점과 종합슈퍼마켓간 차이를 중심으로", 유통과학연구, 13(2), pp.85~94 (2015), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  23. "Korea Association of Convenience Store Industry"[URL]
  24. Levy, M., "Retailing Management" (2007)
  25. Lynn, M. R., "Determination and quantification of content validity", Nursing Research, 35(6), pp.382~385 (1986)
  26. "NACS" (2018)[URL]
  27. Nguyen, D. T., "Service convenience and social servicescape : retail vs hedonic setting", Journal of Services Marketing, 26(4), pp.265~277 (2012)
  28. Parasuraman, A., "Servqual : A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perc", Journal of Retailing, 64(1), pp.12~40 (1988)
  29. 박진제, "AHP 기법을 이용한 의류쇼핑 소비자의 선호점포 유형과 점포선택 속성에 관한 연구", 한국의류학회지, 36(2), pp.138~151 (2012), 한국의류학회
  30. "Retail Magazine" (2017)[URL]
  31. 류미현, "소비자 독특성 및 편의점 관련 특성에 따른 편의점 재이용의도: 지각된 즐거움의 조절효과를 중심으로", 소비문화연구, 20(4), pp.181~204 (2017), 한국소비문화학회[DOI]
  32. Saaty, T. L., "A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), pp.234~281 (1977)
  33. An eigenvalue allocation model for prioritization and planning, "Saaty, T.L", Energy Management and Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, 28~31 (1972)
  34. Saaty, T, "The analytic hierarchy process : planning, priority setting, resource allocation" (1980), McGraw-Hill International Book Company
  35. Seiders, K., "Attention, retailers! How convenient is your convenience strategy?", Sloan Management Review, 41(3), pp.79~90 (2000)
  36. Seiders, K., "SERVCON : development and validation of a multidimensional service convenience scale", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1), pp.144~156 (2007)
  37. 신민경, "CVR 평가 및 AHP 분석을 이용한 정부정책의 소비자지향성 평가지표 개발", 소비자학연구, 23(3), pp.67~95 (2012), 한국소비자학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)