본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

농촌마을 공공공간 및 시설의 입지적합성 평가를 위한 사례연구 - 전남 곡성군 옥과면 일대(거점면단위, 권역단위, 마을단위) 대상으로 -

Suitability Assessment of Rural Public Spaces and Facilities- A Case Study of Okgwa-myeon(Myeon Unit, Region Unit, Village Unit), Gokseong-gun, Jeollanam-do -

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농학

초록

With the rapid change of rural communities and increasing desire for social welfare, the demand for the quality of public spaces and facilities is increasing. However, inefficient location of rural public space and facility has caused problems such as economic inefficiency, inconvenient accessibility, environmental pollution, unsustainable energy use, and disturbance of visual landscape. This study aims to evaluate suitability of public spaces and facilities in three types of rural village: rural downtown village, rural clustered village, and individual village. As a way to measure the suitability of public spaces and facilities, we assessed indicators of suitability in terms of accessibility, usability, biophysical environment, and sustainable management. To evaluate the accessibility, we applied indicators such as distance from residential areas, public transit, market and public facilities. For the evaluation of biophysical environment, we applied indicators such as slope, elevation, aspect, and occurrence of natural disasters. We analyzed digital maps representing the indicators listed above using GIS. We also conducted a survey and face-to-face interviews to evaluate usability and sustainability of management which are not possible to understand through maps. As a result, we identified that suitability of public spaces and facilities in downtown villages is higher than clustered and individual villages. In particular, suitability of infrastructure facilities, social welfare facilities, and income generation facilities in downtown village are higher than those in clustered and individual villages. The suitability of tourism facilities is generally lower than other types of public facility across the three types of villages. Tourism facilities in clustered village have been identified especially unsuitable compared to other types of villages. We expect the outcome of the research is helpful to improve allocation of public spaces and facilities in rural villages.

Abstract

With the rapid change of rural communities and increasing desire for social welfare, the demand for the quality of public spaces and facilities is increasing. However, inefficient location of rural public space and facility has caused problems such as economic inefficiency, inconvenient accessibility, environmental pollution, unsustainable energy use, and disturbance of visual landscape. This study aims to evaluate suitability of public spaces and facilities in three types of rural village: rural downtown village, rural clustered village, and individual village. As a way to measure the suitability of public spaces and facilities, we assessed indicators of suitability in terms of accessibility, usability, biophysical environment, and sustainable management. To evaluate the accessibility, we applied indicators such as distance from residential areas, public transit, market and public facilities. For the evaluation of biophysical environment, we applied indicators such as slope, elevation, aspect, and occurrence of natural disasters. We analyzed digital maps representing the indicators listed above using GIS. We also conducted a survey and face-to-face interviews to evaluate usability and sustainability of management which are not possible to understand through maps. As a result, we identified that suitability of public spaces and facilities in downtown villages is higher than clustered and individual villages. In particular, suitability of infrastructure facilities, social welfare facilities, and income generation facilities in downtown village are higher than those in clustered and individual villages. The suitability of tourism facilities is generally lower than other types of public facility across the three types of villages. Tourism facilities in clustered village have been identified especially unsuitable compared to other types of villages. We expect the outcome of the research is helpful to improve allocation of public spaces and facilities in rural villages.

참고문헌 (7)

  1. 김혜란, "농촌마을 리모델링 대상요소 항목체계 구축에 관한 연구 - 현장실증검증을 통한 도출방법을 중심으로-", 농촌계획, 18(3), pp.111~122 (2012), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
  2. Song B H, "The Suitability Analysis of Environmentally friendly Housing Site Based on the Rural Villages Model", Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environmental, 4(2), pp.3~10 (2004)
  3. 서주환, "농촌공공공간 및 공공시설 디자인의 효율성 증진을 위한 적지선정 개선방안 연구-적지선정을 위한 평가지표의 도출 및 중요도 평가를 중심으로-", 디자인지식저널, (32), pp.245~255 (2014), 한국디자인지식학회
  4. 신영선, "농촌마을 커뮤니티시설의 적정 면적 산정에 관한 연구", 한국조경학회지, 37(6), pp.28~38 (2010), 한국조경학회
  5. Shin, J D, "Metropolitan waste incinerators previous research", Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy, 35(4), pp.632~741 (2008)
  6. Lee, S. A, "Potential Improvements on Community Space in Rural Planning : focused on Rural Villages in Gyeonggi Province", Department of Horticultural Science, pp.2003
  7. Choi, W. S, "PA Study on the Determination of Local Communities Hosting Noxious Facilities", Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy, 28(4), pp.742~756 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)