머신러닝을 통한 잉크 필요량 예측 알고리즘
Machine Learning Algorithm for Estimating Ink Usage
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Research and interest in sustainable printing are increasing in the packaging printing industry. Currently, predicting the amount of ink required for each work is based on the experience and intuition of field workers. Suppose the amount of ink produced is more than necessary. In this case, the rest of the ink cannot be reused and is discarded, adversely affecting the company's productivity and environment. Nowadays, machine learning models can be used to figure out this problem. This study compares the ink usage prediction machine learning models. A simple linear regression model, Multiple Regression Analysis, cannot reflect the nonlinear relationship between the variables required for packaging printing, so there is a limit to accurately predicting the amount of ink needed. This study has established various prediction models which are based on CART (Classification and Regression Tree), such as Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Machine, and XGBoost. The accuracy of the models is determined by the K-fold cross-validation. Error metrics such as root mean squared error, mean absolute error, and R-squared are employed to evaluate estimation models' correctness. Among these models, XGBoost model has the highest prediction accuracy and can reduce 2134 (g) of wasted ink for each work. Thus, this study motivates machine learning's potential to help advance productivity and protect the environment.
Abstract
Research and interest in sustainable printing are increasing in the packaging printing industry. Currently, predicting the amount of ink required for each work is based on the experience and intuition of field workers. Suppose the amount of ink produced is more than necessary. In this case, the rest of the ink cannot be reused and is discarded, adversely affecting the company's productivity and environment. Nowadays, machine learning models can be used to figure out this problem. This study compares the ink usage prediction machine learning models. A simple linear regression model, Multiple Regression Analysis, cannot reflect the nonlinear relationship between the variables required for packaging printing, so there is a limit to accurately predicting the amount of ink needed. This study has established various prediction models which are based on CART (Classification and Regression Tree), such as Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Machine, and XGBoost. The accuracy of the models is determined by the K-fold cross-validation. Error metrics such as root mean squared error, mean absolute error, and R-squared are employed to evaluate estimation models' correctness. Among these models, XGBoost model has the highest prediction accuracy and can reduce 2134 (g) of wasted ink for each work. Thus, this study motivates machine learning's potential to help advance productivity and protect the environment.
참고문헌 (23)
- Akiba, T., "Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimiza-tion Framework", Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data mining (2019)
- Ash, A., "R2 : A Useful Measure of Model Performance when Predicting a Dichotomous Outcome", Statistics in Medicine, 18(4), pp.375~384 (1999)
- Braga-Neto, U. M., "Is cross-validation valid for small-sample microarray classi-fication?", Bioinformatics, 20(3), pp.374~380 (2004)
- Chen, T., "Xgboost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System", Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Sigkdd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2016)
- Chen, T., "Xgboost: Extreme Gradient Boosting", R package version 0.4-2, 1~4 (2015)
- Dyer, D., "Rising Tide:Lessons from 165 Years of Brand Building at Procter & Gamble" (2004), Harvard Business School Press
- Friede, G., "ESG and Financial Performance : Aggregated Evidence from More than 2000Empirical Studies", Journal of Sustainable Finance &Investment, 5(4), pp.210~233 (2015)
- Friedman, J.H., "Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine", Annals of Statistics, 1189~1232 (2001)
- Gkerekos, C., "Machine Learning Models for Predicting Ship Main Engine Fuel Oil Consumption: A Comparative Study", Ocean En-gineering, 188, pp.106282~ (2019)
- Gladysz, B., "Sustainable Printing 4.0—Insights from a Polish Survey", Sustainability, 13(19), pp.10916~ (2021)
- Jordan, M. I., "Machine Learning:Trends, Perspectives, and Prospects", Science, 349(6245), pp.255~260 (2015)
- 정훈, "기계적 모터 고장진단을 위한 머신러닝 기법", 한국산업경영시스템학회지, 40(1), pp.57~64 (2017), 한국산업경영시스템학회
- Kaliya, G., "Estimation of Ink Consumption Used for Printing Process", ~ (2006)
- Lewis, R. J., "An Introduction to Classification and Regression Tree (CART) Analysis", Annual meeting of the society for academic emergency medicine in San Francisco (2000)
- Murthy, S. K., "Automatic Construction of Decision Trees from Data : A Multi-disciplinary Survey", Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2(4), pp.345~389 (1998)
- Natekin, A., "Gradient Boosting Machines, a Tutorial", Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 7, pp.21~ (2013)
- Neter, J., "Applied Linear Statistical Models", ~ (1996)
- Razi, M. A., "A Comparative Predictive Analysis of Neural Networks (NNs), Nonlinear Regression and Classification and Regression Tree (CART) Models", Expert Systems with Applications, 29(1), pp.65~74 (2005)
- Ruggles, P. K., "Printing Estimating : Costing and Pricing Print and Digital Media", pp.2008, PIA
- Shehadeh, A., "Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Residual Value of Heavy Construction Equipment:An Evaluation of Modified Decision Tree, LightGBM, and XGBoost Regression", Automation in Construction, 129, pp.103827~ (2021)
- Song, Y. -Y., "Decision Tree Methods:Applications for Classification and Prediction", Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 27(2), pp.130~ (2015)
- Svetnik, V., "Random Forest : A Classification and Regression Tool for Compound Classification and QSAR Modeling", Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 43(6), pp.1947~1958 (2003)
- Uyanık, G. K., "A Study on Multiple Linear Regression Analysis", Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, pp.234~240 (2013)