농산물 판매시 농가들의 정보화 기기 이용 선택 결정요인 분석
Analysis of Factors of Farmers’ Use of Information Technology Equipment When Selling Agricultural Products
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
By using the raw data of the 2015 Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery Consensus that surveyed the farmers engaged in agriculture, forestry and fishery in 2015, this study investigated the effects of the characteristics of the farms in Gangwon-do on the utilization of the digital devices, which was classified into computers usage only, smartphones usage only, both computers and smartphones usage, and no digital device usage. This study used the Multinomial Logit Model for the above purpose. Moreover, the IIA(Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives) method of the Multinomial Logit Model was analyzed to be suitable. Upon the result of the analysis, when all the other variables were constant in the average, the probability of choosing both computers and smartphones increased by 0.02% as the family member living together with the farm owner increased by 1 person. In addition, the farms with agricultural machineries have 0.03% increased probability of using smartphones to sell their agricultural products, when compared with the farms without agricultural machinery. Moreover, for the farms with high sales profit of the agricultural products, the probability of using computers and the probability of using smartphones increased by 0.04% and 0.01%, respectively, and the probability of using both computers and smartphones increased by 0.02%. On the other hand, for the farms affiliated with the agricultural organization, the probability of using both computers and smartphones increased by 0.17%, and the probability of using only smartphones and the probability of using only computers increased by 0.16% and 0.15%, respectively. In case of selling to the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation(NACF), the probability of using smartphones increased by 0.11% if all other variables were to be constant in the average. In particular, the farms participating in the agriculture-related industries have 1.09% increased probability of using computers, have 0.92% increased probability of using smartphones, and 0.85% increased probability of using both computers and smartphones. Therefore, the implications suggested based on the results of the analysis are as follows. First, the farms' choices of the digital devices are made independently. Hence, the future agricultural industry business platform establishment should necessarily consider the types of farms' choices of the digital devices in the future. Second, since the usage of digital devices has a generally positive influence on the farm household income, digital education to improve farmers’ ability to use the digital devices should be urgently provided in order to improve the farm household income in the farms in Gangwon-do. Third, because the digital devices used to sell agricultural products differ depending on the age of the farm owner, it would be desirable to target the younger generation of the farm owners rather than establishing the agricultural industry business platform for the farms in the aged farm villages. Fourth, it would be advisable for the future agricultural business platform to consider the characteristics of agricultural products sales source.
Abstract
By using the raw data of the 2015 Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery Consensus that surveyed the farmers engaged in agriculture, forestry and fishery in 2015, this study investigated the effects of the characteristics of the farms in Gangwon-do on the utilization of the digital devices, which was classified into computers usage only, smartphones usage only, both computers and smartphones usage, and no digital device usage. This study used the Multinomial Logit Model for the above purpose. Moreover, the IIA(Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives) method of the Multinomial Logit Model was analyzed to be suitable. Upon the result of the analysis, when all the other variables were constant in the average, the probability of choosing both computers and smartphones increased by 0.02% as the family member living together with the farm owner increased by 1 person. In addition, the farms with agricultural machineries have 0.03% increased probability of using smartphones to sell their agricultural products, when compared with the farms without agricultural machinery. Moreover, for the farms with high sales profit of the agricultural products, the probability of using computers and the probability of using smartphones increased by 0.04% and 0.01%, respectively, and the probability of using both computers and smartphones increased by 0.02%. On the other hand, for the farms affiliated with the agricultural organization, the probability of using both computers and smartphones increased by 0.17%, and the probability of using only smartphones and the probability of using only computers increased by 0.16% and 0.15%, respectively. In case of selling to the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation(NACF), the probability of using smartphones increased by 0.11% if all other variables were to be constant in the average. In particular, the farms participating in the agriculture-related industries have 1.09% increased probability of using computers, have 0.92% increased probability of using smartphones, and 0.85% increased probability of using both computers and smartphones. Therefore, the implications suggested based on the results of the analysis are as follows. First, the farms' choices of the digital devices are made independently. Hence, the future agricultural industry business platform establishment should necessarily consider the types of farms' choices of the digital devices in the future. Second, since the usage of digital devices has a generally positive influence on the farm household income, digital education to improve farmers’ ability to use the digital devices should be urgently provided in order to improve the farm household income in the farms in Gangwon-do. Third, because the digital devices used to sell agricultural products differ depending on the age of the farm owner, it would be desirable to target the younger generation of the farm owners rather than establishing the agricultural industry business platform for the farms in the aged farm villages. Fourth, it would be advisable for the future agricultural business platform to consider the characteristics of agricultural products sales source.
참고문헌 (19)
- Kim MH, "A demand survey on the implementation of open service platform to facilitate the diffusion of convergence software for the welfare of Korea", pp.2013
- Development of Smart Agriculture Coping with the 4th Industrial Revolution, "Kim YJ", Korea Rural Economic Institute, 45~57 (2017)
- Hirano CA, "Platform strategy", Eastern Economic News Paper, 22~30 (2010)
- Van Alstyne MW, "Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy", Harvard business review, 94, pp.16~ (2016)
- Kim GH, "Watch the world through the eyes of the platform", pp.70~78 (2015), Sungan Books
- New ICT convergence strategy in agriculture, forestry and food, "Bae YN", 1~43 (2014)
- 2016 The report on the digital divide, "Ministry of Science", 36~50 (2016)
- Schwab K., "The fourth industrial revolution", pp.10~55 (2016), Penguin Group
- Promotion direction and tasks of R & D for agriculture, forestry and fisheries food for realizing smart agriculture, "Hong MY", 3~7, pp.KISTEP Issue Paper 2015-07 (2015)
- 이중복, "안동지방 특용작물재배농가의 정보화 실태와 시스템요구 분석", 한국국제농업개발학회지, 27(5), pp.657~662 (2015), 한국국제농업개발학회[DOI]
- 유찬주, "농업정보화에 대한 농업인의 수용태도 분석", 농업생명과학연구, 42(3), pp.43~52 (2008), 농업생명과학연구원
- The study on the situation and strategies for solving digital divide in rural area, "Lee DP", Korea Rural Economic Institute, 10~15 (2001)
- 남수연 Nam, Sou-Yeon, "친환경과 정보화요인이 농업소득에 미치는 영향", 농촌경제, 29(5), pp.45~62 (2007), 한국농촌경제연구원[DOI]
- 유승주, "정보화가 농가소득 증대에 미치는 영향", 농촌계획, 12(3), pp.81~95 (2006), 한국농촌계획학회
- 이성우, "농가 정보화의 결정요인과 지역간 차이", 농업경제연구, 45(1), pp.47~81 (2004), 한국농업경제학회
- 고석남, "농촌.농업종합대책 목표의 달성을 위한 정보화 전략", 산업경제연구, 19(5), pp.1761~1778 (2006), 한국산업경제학회
- 박진, "농업법인과 중소기업의 정보화수준 비교 분석", 한국통신학회논문지, 40(5), pp.892~902 (2015), 한국통신학회
- Annual report on national informatization in 2016, "Government of Korea", 30~60 (2016)
